when are we as a society going to stop labelling a woman's body as inappropriate?

[albari]

So I had this pfp on general chat for like 4 days. The pfp depicts the shape of my body (my cleavage, my hips). Parts of the female body predominantly viewed as sensual and inevitably sexualised/objectified by men... at least that's what I thought. But it seems certain women subconsciously conform to this ideology as well, because when Ken saw my pfp she immediately associated it with being "inappropriate". Which validates my argument that the stigmatisation of women's bodies is a social issue and not just a misogynystic ideology curated by men.

Women showing skin or cleavage is not inherently inappropriate. The human body is a natural and beautiful thing, and women should be able to present themselves in a way that makes them feel confident and comfortable without fear of judgment or objectification.

The notion that women's bodies are inherently sexual or provocative is a harmful social construct that perpetuates gender-based double standards. Men are often able to show skin without being sexualized or judged, yet women are held to a different standard.

Moreover, the amount of skin a woman shows does not determine her innate character, intelligence, or worth. Women should be able to make their own choices about their bodies and presentation without being shamed or policed.


The notion that a woman's bodily exposure is inherently inappropriate is a reprehensible and outdated concept that warrants dismantling.

 

[Soapie]

..."showing skin", male or female, is pretty frowned upon when done in a room that is 13+, wether the intention be inappropriate or not

The rest is pretty solid tho 👌

 

[Screem]

@H.R. PufnStuf
@Ken_Kaneki

 

[babydolla]

So I had this pfp on general chat for like 4 days. The pfp depicts the shape of my body (my cleavage, my hips). Parts of the female body predominantly viewed as sensual and inevitably sexualised/objectified by men... at least that's what I thought. But it seems certain women subconsciously conform to this ideology as well, because when Ken saw my pfp she immediately associated it with being "inappropriate". Which validates my argument that the stigmatisation of women's bodies is a social issue and not just a misogynystic ideology curated by men.

Women showing skin or cleavage is not inherently inappropriate. The human body is a natural and beautiful thing, and women should be able to present themselves in a way that makes them feel confident and comfortable without fear of judgment or objectification.

The notion that women's bodies are inherently sexual or provocative is a harmful social construct that perpetuates gender-based double standards. Men are often able to show skin without being sexualized or judged, yet women are held to a different standard.

Moreover, the amount of skin a woman shows does not determine her innate character, intelligence, or worth. Women should be able to make their own choices about their bodies and presentation without being shamed or policed.


The notion that a woman's bodily exposure is inherently inappropriate is a reprehensible and outdated concept that warrants dismantling.

the presumed audience of your photos is what makes the photos a problem, babe

men aren't really allowed to has topless photos in general chat either...

so it's rly not a gender thing 🤷🏼‍♀️

 

[Screem]

So I had this pfp on general chat for like 4 days. The pfp depicts the shape of my body (my cleavage, my hips). Parts of the female body predominantly viewed as sensual and inevitably sexualised/objectified by men... at least that's what I thought. But it seems certain women subconsciously conform to this ideology as well, because when Ken saw my pfp she immediately associated it with being "inappropriate". Which validates my argument that the stigmatisation of women's bodies is a social issue and not just a misogynystic ideology curated by men.

Women showing skin or cleavage is not inherently inappropriate. The human body is a natural and beautiful thing, and women should be able to present themselves in a way that makes them feel confident and comfortable without fear of judgment or objectification.

The notion that women's bodies are inherently sexual or provocative is a harmful social construct that perpetuates gender-based double standards. Men are often able to show skin without being sexualized or judged, yet women are held to a different standard.

Moreover, the amount of skin a woman shows does not determine her innate character, intelligence, or worth. Women should be able to make their own choices about their bodies and presentation without being shamed or policed.


The notion that a woman's bodily exposure is inherently inappropriate is a reprehensible and outdated concept that warrants dismantling.

That is a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out objection. Overruled.

 

[Ken_Kaneki]

First off you weren’t kicked for the profile pic but it was INDEED inappropriate. Second you were kicked for 5mins not even by me because you kept going on about me removing the pic and giving you a in room warning. I understand you’re hype that you just turned 18, so now you think you can do whatever you want, but if you’re going to be in a chat site that has rules it’s recommended for you to follow those rules if not you can leave. No matter how old and how grown you think you are little girl it’s still a 13+ room. You should keep everything in your profile appropriate for that type of room. There are other rooms where the pic is more appropriate maybe try singles chat? It’s 17+ the rules are less strict but I would ask the admin for confirmation on that I could be wrong.

 

[albari]

the presumed audience of your photos is what makes the photos a problem, babe

men aren't really allowed to has topless photos in general chat either...

so it's rly not a gender thing 🤷🏼‍♀️

"Aren't really allowed".. but presumably still allowed due to men's bodies not being sexualised to the same degree as women.

I've seen Wyld have countless shirtless pics as his pfp before... the only complaints I saw was those pictures allegedly being old and overused but nothing pertaining to it being inherently inappropriate.

Mine on the other hand is immediately policed and critiqued as "inappropriate" or "slutty" simply due to me being female. There is a double standard unfortunately.

 

[Ken_Kaneki]

"Aren't really allowed".. but presumably still allowed due to men's bodies not being sexualised to the same degree as women.

I've seen Wyld have countless shirtless pics as his pfp before... the only complaints I saw was those pictures allegedly being old and overused but nothing pertaining to it being inherently inappropriate.

Mine on the other hand is immediately policed and critiqued as "inappropriate" or "slutty" simply due to me being female. There is a double standard unfortunately.

Some insight on your history this evening

 

[albari]

Some insight on your history this evening

"women deserve to be beaten" is rage bait me and 'haunt u' were doing out of boredom.

i also don't get what kick history is supposed to prove exactly? do you think you just ended the women's bodily autonomy debate with a screenshot 😭😭😭

 

[Ken_Kaneki]

Nope just proves how much of a nuisance you are to the room ever since you joined it once you got banned from that other room

 

[albari]

Nope just proves how much of a nuisance you are to the room ever since you joined it once you got banned from that other room

I only seemed to become an nuisance to you after Wyld took a liking to me 🙊

don't make me say some things I don't want to. goodnight.

 

[Ken_Kaneki]

I only seemed to become an nuisance to you after Wyld took a liking to me 🙊

don't make me say some things I don't want to. goodnight.

What does this have to do with another person? loll projection

 

[Oseng]

Is it that hard to move on and enjoy the room? I'm just curious lolz, i'm hardly in gen. At this point, you're obviously trying to start something stupid.

Maybe the Teen Chat Ban and the kicks/mutes wasn't enough for you, @H.R. PufnStuf it looks like shes looking for another ban? lmfao

 

[TheDifference]

So I had this pfp on general chat for like 4 days. The pfp depicts the shape of my body (my cleavage, my hips). Parts of the female body predominantly viewed as sensual and inevitably sexualised/objectified by men... at least that's what I thought. But it seems certain women subconsciously conform to this ideology as well, because when Ken saw my pfp she immediately associated it with being "inappropriate". Which validates my argument that the stigmatisation of women's bodies is a social issue and not just a misogynystic ideology curated by men.

Women showing skin or cleavage is not inherently inappropriate. The human body is a natural and beautiful thing, and women should be able to present themselves in a way that makes them feel confident and comfortable without fear of judgment or objectification.

The notion that women's bodies are inherently sexual or provocative is a harmful social construct that perpetuates gender-based double standards. Men are often able to show skin without being sexualized or judged, yet women are held to a different standard.

Moreover, the amount of skin a woman shows does not determine her innate character, intelligence, or worth. Women should be able to make their own choices about their bodies and presentation without being shamed or policed.


The notion that a woman's bodily exposure is inherently inappropriate is a reprehensible and outdated concept that warrants dismantling.

I think you make some good points about society in general. Sexualizing/objectifying females bodies is definitely a troubling issue, especially in the USA and especially with young girls. Many European countries have a much healthier and realistic approach to that topic. We can only hope the US catches up to their approach someday.

That said, the room rules here need to be followed and more to your point, applied equally to all chattters. I think the staff here try their best to do that and if they aren’t then it’s ok to appropriately point it out. I’m speaking in general terms not to this specific situation. Hopefully both sides can have a civil adult discussion about this specific situation. ✌🏻

 

[Ken_Kaneki]

What does the consequences to your actions have to do with another chatter? 💀 I’m not arguing so go cry to HR

 

[coolhell]

This issue calls for a new room. A nudist room, where people can proudly display naked parts of their body and feel closer to nature.
I say why not, after all, we are all born naked.

 

[Akrta]

This issue calls for a new room. A nudist room, where people can proudly display naked parts of their body and feel closer to nature.
I say why not, after all, we are all born naked.

That's adult chat 18+

 

[TheDifference]

This issue calls for a new room. A nudist room, where people can proudly display naked parts of their body and feel closer to nature.
I say why not, after all, we are all born naked.

Come visit us in Adult Chat Desktop and you will see all sorts of things lol
(As long as you’re 18+ of course)

 

[coolhell]

Come visit us in Adult Chat Desktop and you will see all sorts of things lol
(As long as you’re 18+ of course)

With all due respect to the admin/ mod team in the room and for all teams in all rooms... The adult chat room looks to me like a bunch of "horn bots" fighting over who is going to send more nudes. lol

Sorry for this, I really respect peoples choice of rooms but the room is just not for me.

 

[babydolla]

"Aren't really allowed".. but presumably still allowed due to men's bodies not being sexualised to the same degree as women.

I've seen Wyld have countless shirtless pics as his pfp before... the only complaints I saw was those pictures allegedly being old and overused but nothing pertaining to it being inherently inappropriate.

Mine on the other hand is immediately policed and critiqued as "inappropriate" or "slutty" simply due to me being female. There is a double standard unfortunately.

wyld is kicked constantly for that, among other things 💀