In the new Adult Chat, artistic and non vulgar nudes should be allowed. However, erect cock and porn sex images should be banned, and any porn nudes should be kicked for 24 hours. This would give members an option to post more than General chat, and eliminate the perverts to Pervert chat.
#1 Chat Avenue should rename Adult Chat Pervert Chat, and create a new Adult Chat.
- Thread starter KelleyN
- Start date
Unholy
Banned NOT
Her concern has not been heard.
Her concern has been seen.
Unholy
Banned NOT
D
Deleted member 304335
Guest
Some people will talk rude about you or to you because if they talk about themselves no one will give a f/ckMy feelings about you
Just so you know, right now you're full of bullsh/t
Also I hope one day you choke on the bullsh/t you cough up!
Have a good day and stay out of mine
(My apologies if I was too rude... Just don't like rude people who attack other people for no reason)
Last edited by a moderator:
The title "Gay" along with the words "Meet other men in a safe and friendly environment" will discourage women and non-gay men from opening the room. It would be better if “Porn" was renamed to "Non-Porn" in Adult chat. Adult Chat is porn. Therefore, "Porn" is a duplicate room that should be removed or renamed to "Non-Porn."
Nevertheless, this is an enticing offer and I may accept it. It will be easy for me to find a half dozen or more people that will go to the room. Additionally, it may just be a matter of informing people, in the forums, etc., that within "Gay chat" there is a general chat room where discussions of all subject, including politics, religion, music, culture, family, art, sports, and fashion are allowed.
Rules should include, no gifs, videos, or images or realistic images of genitalia or of a human or humans engaged in sex is permitted unless it includes a link showing it is a two meter or greater statue, or it is art, or a nudist photo from an established, museum, art gallery, or nudist site. Nudes of full body females are permitted provided that camera angle is straight on or higher, and there is no touching of sexual areas. First time violators will be kicked for up to eight hours. Repeat violators may be banned.
The room does not need to be password protected, only the message "Welcome and follow the rules." I don't care if occasionally someone finds a way to exploit the rules. That is like seeing one dog turd in my neighborhood, but I would upset if there were thousands of dog turds. If there is frequent problem, that can be rectified with a slight rule modification.
Lmk if/when you want to go ahead with it.
We’ll have to work on those rules though. Are there really that many people wanting to photograph nude statues and share them?
How are you going to verify that a nude statue or artwork is at least 2m away from the camera?
How are you going to verify that any artwork is from an established gallery or museum?
What would you define as an established gallery or museum? A set list?
How do you define a genuine nudist site, since so many use the nudist guise for more sinister things?
Kicks aren’t 8 hours long by the way - they’re 2
Links aren’t allowed. Js
My intent was a life size statue, not the distance from the camera and to be very liberal and not question any statue located in any public place in any city in the world if it is at least one meter high. I just don't want a six inch carved or molded obscene statuette of a person or persons unless located in a museum or art gallery. Actually, we could eliminate that rule and add it only if it was frequently exploited. Like my dog turd example, I would not want rules or make any rule so strictly enforced that to prevent the 1% bad the 99% good is eliminated.
In everyday activities, life is not perfect. Therefore, even at Wal-Mart, once a year I might see something I would rather not see. We have laws that eliminate the 99%, but it would be overkill and require a police state, we don't want, to totally eliminate it.
An established museum, art gallery, or nudist site is one that (1) has been approved and/or is regulated by any government entity, (2) has a web site, (3) has been in operation for at least 12 months (#3 may not be necessary), (4) has a paid or volunteer staff, and (5) is open to the public. A link showing the image on any of the foregoing websites will be proof. In 1964 United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. Ohio said, I know it when I see it. Most people are like Justice Stewart so rarely would verification of art be required.
When I Goggled nudists and nudists sites, I saw many photos of nude people, but not even one that I considered porn; that is, no one having sex and no erect male members. In the unlikely event there is a government approve nudist site with such photos AND, if they are frequently uploaded, we could list that site as not approved. People, typically males, don't upload nudist photos. Instead, they upload images or videos from porn sites or of themselves.
I would not object to full body female nudes if the camera angle is head high, not sexual, and hands are not touching sexual parts. I would have a liberal interpretation allowing a straight on camera but would wish to avoid someone arguing the camera angle is straight on, it just appears lower.
Perhaps photos and images from government approved clothing optional beaches should be allowed. In my opinion, rarely will anyone pay the time and travel cost to travel to a clothing optional beach, and risk being arrested and fined to post porn of themselves. The poster would have the burden of proof showing that the image was taken on a government approved clothing optional beach.
Whether Teen, General, or Adult, 90% of males ask me to see their private body part or they invite me to watch them on cam. When I decline, many go away; the others change the subject. When the occasional first message is obscene, I click "Ignore" and I don't very many "Ignores." Therefore, private messages are not a problem and rarely more than a minor annoyance.
A two hour kick will suffice if repeat violators can be banned.
@TheDifference It is easier to allow links than to not allow links. It is a very simple programming change and rooms have different rules. Generally like Justice Stewart we know porn when we see it so rarely would verification of art be required. Typically in questionable cases, a reverse image search would show if the image is from and an approved site. If not, with a simple programming change, a link can be provided.
Then you should request that programming change from Chatmaster. Good luck.
@Inkandtatts and @TheDifference I have thought about it. Rather than attempting to change standard procedures, perhaps it is best to keep it simple as follows:
Discussion and images of all topics are permitted except, photos of humans engaging in sex acts, and photos showing genitalia. The administrator, etc. has no obligation to punish violators, but if you violate the rules, you may be kicked or banned. The room will reject the argument, "It is no different than what others have posted."
Just as in law, for example, in California, if two under age 18 teens have consensual sex, they can both be prosecuted for statutory rape or sex with a minor, but that never happens.
Rarely will photos of art or nudists be posted, but when they are, the administrator is not required to punish. Almost all males and most females appreciate tasteful nude females’ photos that do not focus on their genitalia and there is no obligation to punish members posting such images.
This doesn’t really apply to the AC rooms so I’ll let others respond to this.
I think it’s getting a little over-complicated for what would be a temporary side room. Perhaps sending a private message to Chatmaster might be more fruitful?
@Chatmaster
Thank you. Inkandtatts. Since Porn is a duplicate of Adult, It would be best if the Porn room was renamed to Non-Porn.
butterfliez
Banned
Adult is an 18+ person. 18+ is allowed to have the possession of nudity of any kind of sense.
In Adults rules it states nudity is allowed. Hence child pornography is not. If general users have a problem they should read rules and decide before entering.
As far as general 13+ rooms. Like teens for example. Nudity gets removed and is not allowed under any exceptions. Sexual content/graphic messages will be warned and suggested to stop.
As far as allowing external links. You would have to check every singular link for child pornography and such hence why links aren’t allowed
Any further complaints Chatmaster would be best to be contacted
In Adults rules it states nudity is allowed. Hence child pornography is not. If general users have a problem they should read rules and decide before entering.
As far as general 13+ rooms. Like teens for example. Nudity gets removed and is not allowed under any exceptions. Sexual content/graphic messages will be warned and suggested to stop.
As far as allowing external links. You would have to check every singular link for child pornography and such hence why links aren’t allowed
Any further complaints Chatmaster would be best to be contacted
Adult Chat, Sex Chat, Porn Chat, and Taboo Chat are four identical rooms. #1 Chat Avenue doesn't have a non-speciality room that most general subjects can be discussed with photos that is not flooded with the most vulgar porn.
There are only three choices: A kindergarten room, a vulgar porn room, or a limited specialty room.
Kim
Gold Member
This cr@p still going?
Ohhhhh lets have an ADULT chat room where ADULTS must NOT talk about anything sexual , post non sexual pictures/Gifs/etc imagine that it'd be empty.
OP i bet you are the kind of woman that gets undressed in the dark or bathroom and wears a long nightdress that stays on regardless.
Ohhhhh lets have an ADULT chat room where ADULTS must NOT talk about anything sexual , post non sexual pictures/Gifs/etc imagine that it'd be empty.
OP i bet you are the kind of woman that gets undressed in the dark or bathroom and wears a long nightdress that stays on regardless.
- Status