I feel like this is the most appropriate place for this topic.
Why is there no unanimous standard as to what "cloning" is considered?
Surely some set of standards can be implemented sitewide and this "cloning" doesnt need to be determined on room-to-room basis.
I gave the following example:
Profile name: Sean
Clone names: houseants, oceanseanoodle, horseantlers
I asked if that was considered cloning because obviously trolls will deliberately make names like that to harass the original nameholder by pinging the original profile name whenever users tag the "clone" name.
I was given the answer: no its not cloning
I then gave a further example:
Profile name: John
Clone names: John1, CoolJohn
I was given the answer: yes its cloning
what?
Why is there no unanimous standard as to what "cloning" is considered?
Surely some set of standards can be implemented sitewide and this "cloning" doesnt need to be determined on room-to-room basis.
I gave the following example:
Profile name: Sean
Clone names: houseants, oceanseanoodle, horseantlers
I asked if that was considered cloning because obviously trolls will deliberately make names like that to harass the original nameholder by pinging the original profile name whenever users tag the "clone" name.
I was given the answer: no its not cloning
I then gave a further example:
Profile name: John
Clone names: John1, CoolJohn
I was given the answer: yes its cloning
what?