Trash aka biased modding

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Reyna Monet

Bronze Member
Singles room
@DynamicDylan room admin

I wasn't kicked or anything but definitely was being picked on and looking for any excuse to kick me. I was warned at least 5x to stop 'instigating" when I wasn't even instigating. (the loop hole to kick, even if not justifed) I initially was tagging @Chaos_NoPMs about a chatter who was recently banned from the room for pedophila chat in PMs. Chaos ignored me several times before she told me that she never heard of that.. Isn't there record where mods can see who's been banned? If not, there really should be.
But, this isn't about that. This is about her nitpicking and reaching for a reason to kick me when I'm not even breaking rules. She would quote my posts with "stop instigating" at least 5x in about a 30 min span... A chatter mentioned my brother AND incestuous claims. I responded to his comment that mentioned my brother. Chaos quoted me and then said no family talk.

postimg.cc

My Gallery — Postimages

postimg.cc postimg.cc

Two parts to this set of SS. Infamous actually mentioned my brother first, along with incest allegations with NO WARNING. But I got the warning and you see others in the room seen her biased modding.
Also. I think when a mod is warning someone they need to tag who their warning is focused on. Most times I don't read mods, ESPECIALLY the trash ass mods... They are often times the actual instigators.

Now, with these SS.
postimg.cc

My Gallery — Postimages

postimg.cc postimg.cc
I want to show how AFTER I MENTIONED I quoted his comment it was deleted.. And not by me. So that means @Chaos_NoPMs deleted my comment to hide the evidence of her trashed biased modding. @DynamicDylan didn't you say you can reference deletions. This is pretty common practice for the likes of the trash mods @Chaos_NoPMs and @UFC Fan

Addition I just logged into the room and I see @UFC Fan using a variate of a banned word 'retard'. I have been kicked for using this word in the proper context. Someone asked, why do we think there weren't autistic people back in the day. And I responded with.. They were just labeled as 'retards' back then. I'm pretty sure it was a max kick as well. I'm one of the ones who sided with adding that word to the no no list. As an insult or whatnot. Who is UFC to call an actual chatter a retard? It's all so ridiculous. But, I used it in general statement and I'm max kicked as to mods and their friends can use it with no worries..
postimg.cc

My Gallery — Postimages

postimg.cc postimg.cc
Anothe prime example of TRASH BIASED MODDING!!
Trash Garbage GIF by Fabiola Lara / Casa Girl

We have enough mods (that the room accepts) now that you no longer need these trash ass mods
Do Better GIF by ABC Network
Throw It Out Trash Can GIF by Pudgy Penguins
Come On Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
Boss Manager GIF by Retro Future E-Girl
 
Last edited:
Reyna Monet said:
wasn't kicked or anything but definitely was being picked on and looking for any excuse to kick me. I was warned at least 5x to stop 'instigating" when I wasn't even instigating. I initially was tagging @Chaos_NoPMs about a chatter who was recently banned from the room for pedophila chat in PMs. Chaos ignored me several times before she told me that she never heard of that.. Isn't there record where mods can see who's been banned? If not, there really should be.
Click to expand...

I don't see where any excuse to kick you comes into play here or any "instigating". But if another user is bothering you then I'd use the ignore feature; It's there for reasons like this. Also, I don't see anywhere on Chao's message telling you to stop. If you believe they are harassing you then report that to a moderator. Mods can see actions like that, But that doesn't mean she has any acknowledgment of when or if it happened with the chat predator.

Reyna Monet said:
Addition I just logged into the room and I see @UFC Fan using a variate of a banned word 'retard'. I have been kicked for using this word in the proper context. Someone asked, why do we think there weren't autistic people back in the day. And I responded with.. They were just labeled as 'retards' back then. I'm pretty sure it was a max kick as well. I'm one of the ones who sided with adding that word to the no no list. As an insult or whatnot. Who is UFC to call an actual chatter a retard? It's all so ridiculous. But, I used it in general statement and I'm max kicked as to mods and their friends can use it with no worries..
Click to expand...

I see what you mean about this word, But nothing else I can say about it.
 
Chaos is the issue. For whatever reason she has Dylan blinded into thinking she's a good mod. She's easily the worst I've ever seen on here over the years. She absolutely singles out those she doesn't like while those she does can do as they wish and it's complete bs. You would think after how many friggin complaints on here that he would do something, or CM would do something and neither do. I just don't get it.
 
Venom* said:
Chaos is the issue. For whatever reason she has Dylan blinded into thinking she's a good mod. She's easily the worst I've ever seen on here over the years. She absolutely singles out those she doesn't like while those she does can do as they wish and it's complete bs. You would think after how many friggin complaints on here that he would do something, or CM would do something and neither do. I just don't get it.
Click to expand...
lol out of the current SET...

ufc does the same thing, audrey does the same thing (she just isn't on too frequently), screem has been doing it for ages, and the new "moose" pair

HAVING SAID THAT

stilinski was doing great on her own, prior to a whole BAG of moderators being added

i haven't seen "diamond firefly", whoever they are, giving anyone ****

and raccoon / possum seemed like the decent one out of the bunch prior to being fired or quitting

there... my 5 cents 🙂
 
Venom* said:
Chaos is the issue. For whatever reason she has Dylan blinded into thinking she's a good mod. She's easily the worst I've ever seen on here over the years. She absolutely singles out those she doesn't like while those she does can do as they wish and it's complete bs. You would think after how many friggin complaints on here that he would do something, or CM would do something and neither do. I just don't get it.
Click to expand...
@Chaos_NoPMs is not the issue. Enough said!
 
Biased mods what a surprise, that's what you get when the site only hires jobless volunteers with no brains.

How many times do you need to be told this. The pedos are a protected class on Chat avenue they get away with anything, maybe once every couple months to look good they might ban one or two. that's just so the site doesn't look so bad LOL

You have to remember a lot of the users are sharing cp links all over the site. you think the owner isn't getting his share of the pie. you ignorant fucks believe the mods, admins or the cm cares about you or your safety. they care about enforcing their own rules. allowing pedos, much worse to roam free. all the while decent users get banned, that's Chat avenue it won't change so get used to it.
 
Womack said:
Biased mods what a surprise, that's what you get when the site only hires jobless volunteers with no brains.
Click to expand...

One again you’re promoting false information. Many of the moderators have jobs in real life. We also all have brains. Although those brains may sometimes operate at varying degrees of efficiency. 😒


Womack said:
How many times do you need to be told this. The pedos are a protected class on Chat avenue they get away with anything, maybe once every couple months to look good they might ban one or two. that's just so the site doesn't look so bad LOL
Click to expand...

In Adult chat and Sex chat we take pedos very seriously and remove them as soon as we identify them. Admins ban them on a daily basis. Every day. Every night.

Womack said:
You have to remember a lot of the users are sharing cp links all over the site. you think the owner isn't getting his share of the pie. you ignorant fucks believe the mods, admins or the cm cares about you or your safety. they care about enforcing their own rules. allowing pedos, much worse to roam free. all the while decent users get banned, that's Chat avenue it won't change so get used to it.
Click to expand...
As I’ve said multiple times now, pedos aren’t allowed to “roam free”. They are identified, kicked, and banned.

The problem (for you) is when you continue to make false claims it reduces your credibility to zero and any VALID point you might make is lost in the din of all the nonsense. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
TheDifference said:
One again you’re promoting false information. Many of the moderators have jobs in real life. We also all have brains. Although those brains may sometimes operate at varying degrees of efficiency. 😒




In Adult chat and Sex chat we take pedos very seriously and remove them as soon as we identify them. Admins ban them on a daily basis. Every day. Every night.


As I’ve said multiple times now, pedos aren’t allowed to “roam free”. They are identified, kicked, and banned.

The problem (for you) is when you continue to make false claims it reduces your credibility to zero and any VALID point you might make is lost in the din of all the nonsense. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Click to expand...
I highly doubt you do what you say. for the sake of arguing all day lets say you do actually kick and then get a few pedos banned good. but your one out of hundreds is not a good return.

Also Saying I'm spreading lies is just a tactic all the mods and admins use to try silence users for spreading the truth, you don't like it. getting exposed for doing such bad jobs at helping keep the site safe for the users.
 
Womack said:
I highly doubt you do what you say. for the sake of arguing all day lets say you do actually kick and then get a few pedos banned good. but your one out of hundreds is not a good return.

Also Saying I'm spreading lies is just a tactic all the mods and admins use to try silence users for spreading the truth, you don't like it. getting exposed for doing such bad jobs at helping keep the site safe for the users.
Click to expand...
🤔
 
Womack said:
I highly doubt you do what you say.
Click to expand...

You are more than welcome to come to Adult Chat and watch me in action (if you’re 18+).
I’ll be there in about 2 hours and you can see that what I told you is the truth.

Womack said:
for the sake of arguing all day lets say you do actually kick and then get a few pedos banned good.
Click to expand...
We remove way more than “a few” pedos. I’d guess I personally remove ~25 a day. And that’s just in a 4 hour shift(s). Multiply that by the rest of the hours in the day.

Womack said:
but your one out of hundreds is not a good return.
Click to expand...
See, now that’s a different statement than what you’ve been saying. So tell me, what would be a “good return” in your mind? Realistically. Not the ideal. But a realistic comment.

Womack said:
Also Saying I'm spreading lies is just a tactic all the mods and admins use to try silence users for spreading the truth, you don't like it. getting exposed for doing such bad jobs at helping keep the site safe for the users.
Click to expand...

I never said you were lying. I said you were making inaccurate statements. There’s a subtle difference.
But semantics aside, I am absolutely not trying to “silence” you. If you notice, I’m actually engaging you in conversation. I’m simply pointing out that your sweeping generalizations are inaccurate.

There’s nothing to “expose” here. I’m always open to constructive criticism. But it’s always interesting when someone complains about the Moderators but then when asked to provide specific examples to back up their complaint, they can’t do it. Hopefully that’s not the case here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top