Should pet owners that can not afford veterinary care be allowed to own pets?

I see everyone’s point.

However I don’t think everyone sees when I posted that life can deal a shitty hand. Even if you’re in the affordable scale.

Not to be that person who says only one payslip away from financial struggle, but yes. Been there done that and will more than likely experience again.

My cat comes first no matter how much he tests my fucking patience. Least he doesn’t grass on me. 🤣💙
 
with the cost of vet bills you don't even really have to be "poor" to not be able to afford it if your pet is seriously injured or ill. there should be more government or privately funded clinics set up so animals can be taken care of regardless of whether their owners can afford it. i'll gladly pay more money in taxes if my money was going to something like this....instead of wherever the **** it's going. #vetcareforall #animalsocialist
Agreed.
 
u could always just get pet insurance for 50$ a month, & never has to worry about it again 💁🏼‍♀️
 
FBDA862-C-68-F5-4-C0-C-AAD2-AF1176-B20-A90.png
 
This raises another question... should people who can't afford health care be allowed to have kids? If they do and they can't afford it, they get government assistance. Should it be the same way with pets?

In an ideal world, the necessities of life (food, shelter, hygiene, etc.) would be free and wouldn't have to be worried about, and this would extend to pets as well. Unfortunately, the people in government care more about the ever-increasing profits of massive corporations than the life necessities of the "common" person.

So to answer the question, as things are now... if the pet owner literally can't afford to feed the pet, then they shouldn't be allowed custody of the pet. If they can afford food, but would go into debt if they got a vet bill... they should be allowed to keep the pet, because they're at least taking care of it, aren't they?

Or even better, the government could pay for the people who can't afford pet care. It spends a lot more on a lot dumber. (And of course if this happened, you'd have idiots with no empathy shrieking communism.)
 
Making insurance mandatory could be one option. I don’t know about elsewhere but it’s relatively cheap here if you shop around. Medium sized dog covered for £5k a year is £14.49 a month.

Veterinary services are being looked into by the CMA here due to the stupidly high prices they charge.
 
pet insurance here does not cover pre existing conditions. and many are reimbursement only for "regular normal care" not emergency . regular normal care for my dog is $207 a year based on her last wellness check. that covers all her required shots and rabies licence and 12 mins with the vet. so i would pay $600 a year and only get back $207 after i submit my claim. emergent care is hardly ever covered.( your pet vomited, they got an infection, they need surgery.) and in my case my dogs monthly medicines and visit would never be approved as covered care. the possible only way to get everything covered is to purchase the policy the day the pet is born. some breeders may pass it off to you for you to continue but most dont. and insurance doesnt happen at a shelter or rescue.
 
All spay and neuter should be free. And vets should be obligated by law to donate a % of procedures/hours (by law) much like legal aid lawyers are obligated to do pro bono work.

Does being able to afford vet care- or being wealthy mean someone is a good animal caregiver? I've seen rich people angry we didn't donate a 10 dollar worm pill, or give them free cat food. Many were most concerned they got a tax receipt, and more than I care to remember want to return an adopted animal like they would a purse they no longer fancy. Quick to want cat euthanized for missing the litter box.

One lady stand out in my memory. She worked 6 days a week in a laundrymat. She lived in the country on acrerage someone else owned, in a very small dilapidated trailer, amongst dozens of other and abandoned autos (basically a junkyard). When she asked for help for her cat, she was embarrassed she had no top plate denture. At best you could consider her working poor.

Her cat had a issue and she was worried sick about him. So we agreed to help, when I went to pick up the cat to take to the vet (she had a beater car (barely roadworthy) and 2 things stuck out in my mind. One was she had her cats paperwork top shelf of her old dresser, neatly stacked- every scrap of info of her tom) and put in a baggie so it was protected. And a picture of him as a kitten. She had made a collar by hand with his name on it.

The other, was a jar with coins (1 and 2 dollar coins etc) anyhow she emptied it and wanted to give it me for gas money ( she felt bad we came to take the cat to the vet for her ) Cat got to see the doc, is fine, we left her with some extra medicine, a prmise to supply with good quality food and we declined to take her coins.


TLDR? Money has nothing to do whether you are a good. kind loving caregiver- be it for animals or kids. A good heart worth more than it's weight in gold.
 
No.

Is what a significant majority will say, especially those in the veterinary profession who are often faced with sick animals whose owners are unable or unwilling to pay for their care.

I am not quite as hardline as this. I think animal ownership is a wonderful thing, brings joy to many, many people and it makes me sad to think that the costs involved would prevent people from experiencing it.
owning an animal is a privilege and not a right.

If you are going to invite a living creature into your home and your family, then you must be prepared for the responsibility and all that it entails. Which means, as well as feeding and caring for them correctly, you must be able to provide (i.e be able to pay for) all they need to stay in good health. This means firstly preventing disease; by ensuring they are fully vaccinated, regularly treated for parasites and, if appropriate, neutered and – and this is the biggie – paying for their care when they are poorly.
If you think you might struggle but still want a pet, there are things you can do to make this achievable.

Firstly, budget for what you know will be needed. The annual cost of vaccinations and anti-parasitic treatments will likely be around £150 for a cat or average sized dog. In addition most pets will need to be neutered and microchipped in the first year of their lives; a quick call to your local vet will let you know the costs involved.

Secondly, take out pet insurance. Policies vary in costs and some of the cheaper options should cover you in the case of one off large bills but they probably won’t pay for on-going care of some medical conditions. Prices for this kind of cover can be as low as £10 a month for a cat or small dog. If this isn’t within your reach then I will ask again, should you have a pet?

In the UK the RSPCA and PDSA provide veterinary care to those on benefits and low incomes. However, and I cannot say this enough, they do NOT exist so you can indulge every pet whim you have or to clear up any messes you make by buying low quality animals, not vaccinating or neutering them so they get sick, not training them so they fight or run away and get injured, or any of the other scenarios many people get themselves into.

If you qualify for their care, treat these charities with respect, contribute towards the treatment as much as you can and don’t abuse their services by making poor choices with your pets.

Rescue centres often have residents with on-going medical conditions and will pay continue to pay for this care when they are rehomed. Taking on one of these animals gives you the security of knowing the charity will support you. However, they often don’t pay for any new illnesses which develop.

You could also consider volunteering. Spending time at your local shelter will allow you to have hands on time with animals without actually owning them, many rescues operate on a home fostering basis and wonderful charity The Cinnamon Trust, which operates nationwide, always needs volunteers to support elderly or infirm owners care for their pets in their homes.

You could even sign up to websites like Borrow My Doggy which let you walk dogs for owners in your area or, if you have one, visit your local cat cafe!

However, at the end of the day if you decide own an animal yourself, then you are responsible for it’s health and welfare and must to be able to pay for all that entails.

So, if you don’t want to, can’t be bothered to or genuinely cannot afford to, budget for the vet.

Then the answer is no, you shouldn’t have the pet.
 
u could always just get pet insurance for 50$ a month, & never has to worry about it again 💁🏼‍♀️
Some people can not afford that. Not everyone has spare money and a large majority of the population is living paycheck to paycheck. This just in the USA. I could only concur third world countries are worse.
This raises another question... should people who can't afford health care be allowed to have kids? If they do and they can't afford it, they get government assistance. Should it be the same way with pets?

In an ideal world, the necessities of life (food, shelter, hygiene, etc.) would be free and wouldn't have to be worried about, and this would extend to pets as well. Unfortunately, the people in government care more about the ever-increasing profits of massive corporations than the life necessities of the "common" person.

So to answer the question, as things are now... if the pet owner literally can't afford to feed the pet, then they shouldn't be allowed custody of the pet. If they can afford food, but would go into debt if they got a vet bill... they should be allowed to keep the pet, because they're at least taking care of it, aren't they?

Or even better, the government could pay for the people who can't afford pet care. It spends a lot more on a lot dumber. (And of course if this happened, you'd have idiots with no empathy shrieking communism.)
Go make your thread. Reported.
 
There are so many low income families that have animals that can’t afford animals. I’m on the fence about it definitely.
My sis in law is a vet tech and she tells us all the time about how people come in that can’t afford their bill and the owners will surrender their animals because they can’t afford the bill. My mom in law and sister in law own some of the dogs that have been surrendered. My sis in law will literally just pay for the bill herself and take the animal home.

That’s why I’m on the fence about it because some people who can’t afford the bill will give up their animal so it can get help. 🤷‍♀️

Growing up poor myself I have had animals that my dad and I could have never been able to afford vet care for and fortunately for us we never had to get vet care for the animals. I do think animals need a check up every year or every couple of years to make sure things are fine though.
Yes if they were selfish they would keep it regardless because it's "theirs".

I think that is the moral wrong there

Sadly the people that can't afford care likely put under the people that can or we wouldn't have shelters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kd.
I have to point of views. I both think yes and no. Yes bc if they're going through depression and need a friend i think they should get a pet. However if they're just getting a pet to have a pet and can't afford they're health then i would say no.
 
Sadly yes. These scamming insurance
Companies forget there’s people behind a claim.
Oh you mean the $50 a month isn't enough!?
Don't forget about your deductibles, excluded procedures and your new rates when you file a claim.
 
To everyone that answered, no they shouldn't. They should just get insurance. They should have money saved up etc.

65% + of households own pets, 50% own dogs.

Ironically 60% of America is also living paycheck to paycheck.
 
Top