Again not addressing the issues ~ just closing threads

[ban active]

Once again @Samwise has shut down a thread concerning his behaviour with blaming others for retaliating on a chatter whom he himself said was "CM banned malevolent troll where underage ******** do not need to see"



My post was directed @Chatmaster not @Samwise.

Yes this chatter was banned for the previous two years should we ask why? They were sexually abusing women/children in general chat but lets skip that point at look at others ie myself and @MrBlunt what about all the other ******** who have commented on these posts, do they also have an agenda?

When I posted the thread I admitted to giving back what he has been doing for months the previous weeks but lets just side step that issue and pretend this is not happening to close threads.

I am asking @Chatmaster why this person is still not banned and why @Samwise is allowed to allow it.


And lets be honest here @Samwise your dislike of me is making this a personal vendetta for you, where I am trying to get some action on a chatter who violates the rules of General Chat daily everytime they come into the room and sexually assaults the women ******** in a 13+room, stop hiding behind your buttons and let @Chatmaster answer my concern/complaint.

Alphamale has no consequences with his behaviour but lets focus on the people who are sick to death of reading about r*** His ideas on choking women, shoving his p***s down ******** throats to choke them but lets focus on someone trying to stop the bullshit in the room.

Do not close my thread I am waiting on @Chatmaster for information.

 

[-Luka]

@Chatmaster !

 

[rapinoes smirking revenge]

"antagonizing a user" and using the "user was banned for 2 years" as a defense for allowing the user to do the same kind of thing they were banned for. again attacking the person making the complaint.

 

[ElSerto]

Not sure why people are surprised by this. It took forever to get Sthcalguy banned in several rooms, General Chat being one of those. There was an incident of a known predator who even said himself about having physical connections with underage girls that didn’t get banned and then there was the whole Cassie thing where she was displaying somewhat inappropriate clothing shots.

Inb4 I get the “you’re a salty ex mod” comment to my response because I speak the truth.

 

[purplerose]

but lets skip that point at look at others ie myself and @MrBlunt what about all the other ******** who have commented on these posts, do they also have an agenda?

the answer to your rhetorical question is yes*.


*but really no but no one can correct him! he has a red name... its right up there with SiTe 0wNeR's!!!

 

[American Badger]

The sad part is most here just want transparency and honesty, I always found after 25 years as a Vol. Firefighter and 4 years as a 1st. Asst. Chief that if told the men a honest answer and not hide the problem it could always be resolved. Just a thought !

 

[-Luka]

The sad part is most here just want transparency and honesty, I always found after 25 years as a Vol. Firefighter and 4 years as a 1st. Asst. Chief that if told the men a honest answer and not hide the problem it could always be resolved. Just a thought !

‘Do as I say not as I do or be banned’

Translated.

 

[BlackLivesMatter]

In before Sammy does his gaslighting, "My hands are tied, I have a boss too, Alpha Male was banned once for 8 hours last week, I suggest you ******** use ignore. "
This type of behavior can be seen as a covert support for Alpha Male.
@Chatmaster , answer the question does having A VIP mean a user can threaten sexually abuse of other ******** and their families because they have VIP? Because that is what we are being told.

 

[purplerose]

In before Sammy does his gaslighting, "My hands are tied, I have a boss too, Alpha Male was banned once for 8 hours last week, I suggest you ******** use ignore. "
This type of behavior can be seen as a covert support for Alpha Male.
@Chatmaster , answer the question does having A VIP mean a user can threaten sexually abuse of other ******** and their families because they have VIP? Because that is what we are being told.

any normal site would be here are the rules for all base/free users here are the extra/different rules for vip based on extra options. there are no refunds on any bought items. if you want to sue us go ahead. but lawyers xy&z will represent us in court . in the end you may get your $5.99 back but youll be paying more in court fees.


but here its basically pay to play, no rules. owner/site admin/cm doesnt want to let go of the $20 so instead of saying vip have these rules based on extra options. they have no rules. allowing those to think (and say) they have "rights" because they bought something. they also force users into gifts again because they dont want to undo the $20.

if i were this site ( or any site looking to keep a positive reputation) and a user did what many of these vips do i would be throwing their money back and them and say go, while utilizing the sitewide ban button.

 

[StubleU]

if you violate terms of service...your money is gone...you did wrong...you violated terms by which you follow in a private establishment...there is no suing or claims against that violation.

banning is a simple task...six or seven clicks at most from login screen...they're not lazy...they're complacent

 

[purplerose]

if you violate terms of service...your money is gone...you did wrong...you violated terms by which you follow in a private establishment...there is no suing or claims against that violation.

banning is a simple task...six or seven clicks at most from login screen...they're not lazy...they're complacent

have you read the TOS lately.. and i mean that... they change the TOS sometimes as many times most people change their undies.

 

[StubleU]

have you read the TOS lately.. and i mean that... they change the TOS sometimes as many times most people change their undies.

oh...i'm not disputing it...i'm just saying...you can't sue for violating TOS'...whether they're kept up to date...or still reference DigiChat...is here nor there...that said...he can dispute it with his credit card company if he feels like he's in the right...but ultimately...tha'ts not a reason not to ban someone.

If you want more details about Stripe charge back policies...you can read up on it here

How disputes work

A dispute occurs when an account owner contacts their bank to contest a payment to you. Understand the complete dispute process from early warnings and inquiries through formal chargebacks, evidence submission deadlines, and final decisions.

stripe.com

 

[purplerose]

now now mikey your telling trade secrets higher ups dont want these people to know

 

[StubleU]

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=how+to+******+something

well fucks...that's lame

 

[Deleted member 263960]

The user is 17- a minor. Banned on and off for most of the last 2 years, primarily for spamming/disrupting chat- while habitually evading bans. His account was last banned by me before the platform changed.

Since his return my observation is most of the time he posts other users pics, in some sort of "smash or pass" idea, like was posted in these very forums. Compared to his prior behaviour it's quite mild- there is no angry spamming by him now either.

His prior behaviour isn't wanted or allowed, not by me not by the site. At this time room staff are managing him. Those that troll him, or antagonize him, instead of ignoring him, or not being part of the solution.

His past violations, in no way justify harassing a 17 year old, by attacking his mother as a w hore etc that is also odious- isn't helpful, and is a violation of room rules.

TLDR? The solution is report violations, click ignore, and if he backslides he will be banned again.

 

[StubleU]

he will be banned again.

pretty sure this is the only thing we want to hear

 

[BlackLivesMatter]

The user is 17- a minor. Banned on and off for most of the last 2 years, primarily for spamming/disrupting chat- while habitually evading bans. His account was last banned by me before the platform changed.

Since the user is 17, I think it would be helpful to ban him so he can concentrate on his education.
It still sounds like you are saying VIPS have different rules and will be treated differently. Like we can ban Black Lives Matter because he typed Don't come to my hood to a user that had the name White Pride Guy. However a minor can threaten sexual assault on users and their families because they are VIP. It still looks like you are protecting this user or have no balls.

 

[StubleU]

Since the user is 17, I think it would be helpful to ban him so he can concentrate on his education.
It still sounds like you are saying VIPS have different rules and will be treated differently. Like we can ban Black Lives Matter because he typed Don't come to my hood to a user that had the name White Pride Guy. However a minor can threaten sexual assault on users and their families because they are VIP. It still looks like you are protecting this user or have no balls.

side note...clever..."don't come to my hood" to guys that wear white...hoods lol

a threat is still a threat and depending on the nature of it can be an illegal action...in most of north america...

 

[!Krystal_Rose]

The user is 17- a minor. Banned on and off for most of the last 2 years, primarily for spamming/disrupting chat- while habitually evading bans. His account was last banned by me before the platform changed.

Since his return my observation is most of the time he posts other users pics, in some sort of "smash or pass" idea, like was posted in these very forums. Compared to his prior behaviour it's quite mild- there is no angry spamming by him now either.

His prior behaviour isn't wanted or allowed, not by me not by the site. At this time room staff are managing him. Those that troll him, or antagonize him, instead of ignoring him, or not being part of the solution.

His past violations, in no way justify harassing a 17 year old, by attacking his mother as a w hore etc that is also odious- isn't helpful, and is a violation of room rules.

TLDR? The solution is report violations, click ignore, and if he backslides he will be banned again.

You can up my ban idgaf, but you unbanned him and not me? WHEN HE WAS HELP ME OUT!?

I'm in there all the fuçking time, circumventing my bans, just to talk toc, for 2 hours then I leave.

I troll you, because you banned me, do you honestly think that I hate you? Your stupid if you think that,I do miss you, but like come on give me a break here.

Your the only one person with a grudge against me, no one does, anyone else thinks that I made stupid choices.

I already forgave you, like come on man. GIVE ME A BREAK, I BEEN BURNT OUT FOR MONTHS, I DON'T WANT TO SPAM NO MORE 😭😭😭

btw I'm Akrta 😭😭😭😭

 

[-Luka]

You can up my ban idgaf, but you unbanned him and not me? WHEN HE WAS HELP ME OUT!?

I'm in there all the fuçking time, circumventing my bans, just to talk toc, for 2 hours then I leave.

I troll you, because you banned me, do you honestly think that I hate you? Your stupid if you think that,I do miss you, but like come on give me a break here.

Your the only one person with a grudge against me, no one does, anyone else thinks that I made stupid choices.

I already forgave you, like come on man. GIVE ME A BREAK, I BEEN BURNT OUT FOR MONTHS, I DON'T WANT TO SPAM NO MORE 😭😭😭

btw I'm Akrta 😭😭😭😭

Ssd 😁

Edit: ssd for potential dirty edit/ban of fax