Quoting you is a "personal attack"?
Is the LGBT community averting their own acceptance by perpetuating anger?
- Thread starter Bread.
- Start date
Let's take this line right here and clarify something, they're not "opposing views". An opposing view is "i don't like pineapple on pizza". These are ideologies and beliefs that invalidate and seek to eliminate the existence of a group of people. So the whole premise of this "debate" is based on a falsehood of equalization between the two sides. One is fighting to exist, one is fighting to invalidate their existence. So to say that the 2SLGBTQIA+ community is "perpetuating the very hate they wish to abolish" is a bold face lie. They're trying to survive.
Nobody is seeking to eliminate LGBT123++. For example in my belief system we dont condone homosexuality. Just because i dont agree with what you do, doesnt mean i need to be "labeled" and treated with hostility. To say i think homosexuality is wrong doesnt mean im invalidating them as human beings. You could argue that both sides are trying exist by that matter or go onto say that even pedophiles deserved to live because of their sexual preferences. There is a reason we live in a world of moralities and immoralities.
Go look at the current real world example.
Palestinians are fighting for their right to exist. and Israel is fighting to invalidate their existence. Or is it the other way around depending on which side you wish to support.
Instead of fighting to exist we should fight to co-exist.
Go look at the current real world example.
Palestinians are fighting for their right to exist. and Israel is fighting to invalidate their existence. Or is it the other way around depending on which side you wish to support.
Instead of fighting to exist we should fight to co-exist.
Whether you personally don't think that it would result in the eradication of a group it re-enforces and gives platitude to a group that does and as long as that perspective exists, no one in the community is safe or should expect any different from anyone that acts in a way that denotes an unfavorable view of who they are.
No, that's a predator that preys on youth. When yo seek to hurt someone that's not a sexual preference, that's a sexualization. There's a difference.
So who should exist again? The people with ideology LGBT or no LGBT? No side is fighting for the opposing sides beliefs
Not sure how you can argue that non lgbt believers are out for the eradication of lgbts when there has been such tremendous stride to LGBT rights. How would that have been possible when less than 10% of the population identified as LGBT?
The same thing that protects sexual preference rights protects religious rights. So why do sexual preference beliefs trump religious beliefs. The answer is one set of beliefs does not trump the others
Not sure how you can argue that non lgbt believers are out for the eradication of lgbts when there has been such tremendous stride to LGBT rights. How would that have been possible when less than 10% of the population identified as LGBT?
The same thing that protects sexual preference rights protects religious rights. So why do sexual preference beliefs trump religious beliefs. The answer is one set of beliefs does not trump the others
Heathen2002
Banned
So much verbiage from the masterdebater massdebating about gay things again
Let's do this again since it was lost to the "maintenance" they performed.
What you anecdotally understand as acceptance and the facts are two completely different things. As someone that proports themselves to be a debater you ought to know. That said, shall we look at some facts about the US laws as of May of this year?
- Over 520 anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been introduced in state legislatures.
- Over 220 bills specifically target transgender and non-binary people
- A record 70 anti-LGBTQ laws have been enacted so far this year, including
- Laws banning gender affirming care for transgender youth: 15
- Laws requiring or allowing misgendering of transgender students: 7
- Laws targeting drag performances: 2
- Laws creating a license to discriminate: 3
- Laws censoring school curriculum, including books: 4
- Laws banning gender affirming care for transgender youth: 15
- Laws requiring or allowing misgendering of transgender students: 7
- Laws targeting drag performances: 2
- Laws censoring school curriculum, including books: 4
If you have a problem with these laws then perhaps you should look into protesting your government and not perpetuating hate by attacking religious beliefs.
again...your beliefs on what the religiously backed laws are doing vs what the statistics show are completely different. stop sudo-jihading a community that's just trying to exist.
If you want to know what religously backed laws are go to the middle east.
So what do you say to a person who is a Christian LGBT?
I do know it. I didn't specify what religion. Your ethnocentrism is showing.
Nothing. That's their choice. Not all Christians view sexuality as a problem.
Show me the stats on 2SLGBTQIA+ violence towards straight folks. Prove to me that this is a problem in the same way that it is in the reverse fashion. You're strawmaning this so hard to push your own fallacies.
No, I'm asking you to provide evidence that your original statement has any statistical foundation in the same regard that those that oppose a 2SLGBTQIA+ lifestyle experience.
You really need to stop making posts where the foundation of your "debate" isn't just a blatant bias and attempt to justify your own projections of insecurity about your actions.
You really need to stop making posts where the foundation of your "debate" isn't just a blatant bias and attempt to justify your own projections of insecurity about your actions.