Why arent Corn bots immediately banned?

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bread.

Gold Member
Nearly everyday i used to login as guest in general chat id be spammed by 1 porn bot and 2 sex bots. Since being a member that number has now diminished but i still see them. What if i find surprising is that everytime i am messaged them i see that they have "established accounts" that have a high xp chatter level, several likes and are weeks sometimes months old. How is having pornography in your PFP not an immediate ban?
 
Months and months of evidence all over forums to confirm we have. Threads get deleted and/or closed.

If you message Chatmaster the PMs get intercepted.

IYKYK
 
But its chatmaster who decides what is bannable not the admins. So why is no one pressing chatmaster for change?
 
I mean they have access to the database but its not like theyre checking up on who is sending private messages or can predict when they are sent.

So its not like they are "intercepted"

Also why does chatmaster always hide behind staff he needs to be held accountable.
 
They are intercepted because more than one person has access to the Chatmaster account.

IP’s don’t lie nor do the tracking cookies. 🤫
 
Is that why 99% of admins always COCKILY say to PM chatmaster.
Looking At You Reaction GIF by TikTok

Sounds like this place is rigged
 
Bread. said:
Is that why 99% of admins always COCKILY say to PM chatmaster.
Looking At You Reaction GIF by TikTok

Sounds like this place is rigged
Click to expand...
And the two who say this, are two who have access.
If Chatmaster is in California then I’d love to know why there’s a Canadian IP address and a Midwestern USA IP address associated with that account.

Luka tells no lies considering I’m the dumbest ever when it comes to technology.
 
Why would chatmaster allow anyone to have access to chatmaster account when people with financial/transactional issues are directed to PM chatmaster?
 
That’s something you’d have to ask CM. Hopefully you get a response from the real one.

Can’t answer that one as i dont know why he does it. But he does.

People are also directed to contact CM regarding biased admins allowing things in their room (such as your OP and my screenshot confirming). How swiftly are they actioned? Money talks.
 
-Luka said:
View attachment 971928

Porn isn’t bannable offence apparently. That’s why the floorshitter gets away with sending her nudes to minors.
Click to expand...

Still regurgitating dated posts? Context matters, so a user with no history of staff actions can be treated differently than a porn bot or sex spammer. (That quote was when I was newer and didn't know every word would be parsed and used against me.) It was intended to differentiate between "simple nudity" and explicit sex acts.


"► General Chat *clean* chat room-which means no sexual/adult content, no nudity/porn and is not a place for excessively vulgar /tasteless chat. This room is not a place for explicit posts of any kind.

Bread. said:
Nearly everyday i used to login as guest in general chat id be spammed by 1 porn bot and 2 sex bots. Since being a member that number has now diminished but i still see them. What if i find surprising is that everytime i am messaged them i see that they have "established accounts" that have a high xp chatter level, several likes and are weeks sometimes months old. How is having pornography in your PFP not an immediate ban?
Click to expand...

Not having seen the accounts I doubt there is any posting porn that are "months old" System catches at will, and I ban the rest as I see them.



(Also, she was banned for a year, account deleted,. Her room is singles now so thats that.)
 
H.R. PufnStuf said:
Not having seen the accounts I doubt there is any posting porn that are "months old" System catches at will, and I ban the rest as I see them.



(Also, she was banned for a year, account deleted,. Her room is singles now so thats that.)
Click to expand...
I dont know if theyre months old but basically all i see have likes and xp . Its not necessarily porn per se but all ive seen are nude women with their tiits or cooch out .

I can see them being kicked out by mods and that cycle repeating leading to the account staying active idk
 
Bread. said:
I dont know if theyre months old but basically all i see have likes and xp . Its not necessarily porn per se but all ive seen are nude women with their tiits or cooch out .
Click to expand...
some are what we call porn bots, and they do come nad go in waves.
 
admin panel has blacklist permission but then its useless if CM just keeps refreshing the server every week.
 
H.R. PufnStuf said:
Still regurgitating dated posts? Context matters, so a user with no history of staff actions can be treated differently than a porn bot or sex spammer. (That quote was when I was newer and didn't know every word would be parsed and used against me.) It was intended to differentiate between "simple nudity" and explicit sex acts.


"► General Chat *clean* chat room-which means no sexual/adult content, no nudity/porn and is not a place for excessively vulgar /tasteless chat. This room is not a place for explicit posts of any kind.



Not having seen the accounts I doubt there is any posting porn that are "months old" System catches at will, and I ban the rest as I see them.



(Also, she was banned for a year, account deleted,. Her room is singles now so thats that.)
Click to expand...
I set my account to delete before you banned me, that's why my account deleted. So that means I was leaving your room before you banned me 😊 and I was actually only banned for 3 months. No idea where you got 1 year from 🤔 strange. I was able to log in on guest account after 3 months of not being able to log in, so that means you only banned me for 3 months.

So get your facts right HR
HR is scared of luka.

Also, I'm still waiting on the proof of where I privately sent my nudes to minors?

Any ss of this?

Another FALSE accusation.
There's never any evidence to back up this allegation....Funny that isn't it 🤔 (because it's not true)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top