Tagging

Status
Not open for further replies.
! Burnt Pizza

! Burnt Pizza

Gold Member
Ok I'm curious what the rule is with people not asking to be tagged. Previously some one asked me to not tag them and then the admin made me stop tagging the person claiming it's harassment. Then months later I ask someone to stop tagging me and a mod just tells me to put the person on ignore if I don't want them too. So my question is which one is the true rule. Do you have to stop tagging or can you continue because the person can just Iggy you. @Simply Karina @Chatmaster
 
Antagonization will see you having a time out, that can come in any form. As Ive mentioned in previous posts (countless posts), you have shown your intent is nothing more than to disrupt the room by any means. It is my duty to make sure the room runs smoothly, people are happy, and we keep our community growing. Therefore when you try to do the opposite, I (we, the team) will act.

Youre choices are to be part of the community or watch it blossom from the outside. Have a nice day 💜
 
Bread. said:
same rules being applied differently to different people is discrimination.
Click to expand...
sometimes those different ppl r also infamous for being pains in the butt tho
Think About It GIF by Identity
 
! Burnt Pizza said:
Ok I'm curious what the rule is with people not asking to be tagged. Previously some one asked me to not tag them and then the admin made me stop tagging the person claiming it's harassment. Then months later I ask someone to stop tagging me and a mod just tells me to put the person on ignore if I don't want them too. So my question is which one is the true rule. Do you have to stop tagging or can you continue because the person can just Iggy you. @Simply Karina @Chatmaster
Click to expand...
If you are tagging the person and you were asked to stop, you should have. I don't see where there is the problem. Why should a person have to put you on Ignore when YOU could have put them on Ignore. It simply comes down to harassment. The same reason I had to tell you after four likes on my profile to stop but it didn't stop until after six.
 
Tams said:
sometimes those different ppl r also infamous for being pains in the butt tho
Think About It GIF by Identity
Click to expand...
doesnt make it right, if anything it just fuels more pains in the butt behavior. Someone needs to set the standard, and there is no standard in treating people differently.
 
Bread. said:
same rules being applied differently to different people is discrimination.
Click to expand...
Shut up
Either you accept it or you don't; but what does CONSTANTLY bitching do for you?
Nothing.
You ever wonder why we ignore you?
Cause you do is bitch.
Try to not do that -- just ONCE -- and watch what happens.
 
ReaganTaylor said:
Shut up
Either you accept it or you don't; but what does CONSTANTLY bitching do for you?
Nothing.
You ever wonder why we ignore you?
Cause you do is bitch.
Try to not do that -- just ONCE -- and watch what happens.
Click to expand...
ive addressed 1 complaint to you in 4 years of being here. cut the cap.

You want courtesy and respect you have to give it.
 
yes ONE and not even ONE week ago i might add.

Well if there wouldnt be something to BITCH about there would be no BITCHING


Maybe treating people the same way would be a start
 
So I ask what is the purpose of a tag.
In fast moving chat its to notify the post to the user, as in a mutual conversation as commonally used.

So a hypothetical situation....
I have to ask, if its to tell someone else of there location and highlight it? X tagged is in Y country not involving X?
And a reverse tag to ask them to stop seems warranted.
Perhaps also replying "don't tag me" may not seem warranted.
But the whole thing is to provoke as Karina said to antagonise.

All the time the questioner seeks to refine the rules to obtain legal certantity.
Chat is never like that you seek to paralyse staff to stop any action.
I guess the questioner has an agenda which is anti Chat Avenue.
I hasten to add that the questioner appears on the ban list of those that set up and assisted NY Stallion set up a site in opposition to Chat Avenue and has no loyalty to here..

Flame
 
Exactly. So shut up and quit whining.

And don't make BS threads either, sandwich, because we don't care.

People who make BAITING THREADS should shut the hell up. Just saying.
 
flame_song said:
So I ask what is the purpose of a tag.
In fast moving chat its to notify the post to the user, as in a mutual conversation as commonally used.

So a hypothetical situation....
I have to ask, if its to tell someone else of there location and highlight it? X tagged is in Y country not involving X?
And a reverse tag to ask them to stop seems warranted.
Perhaps also replying "don't tag me" may not seem warranted.
But the whole thing is to provoke as Karina said to antagonise.

All the time the questioner seeks to refine the rules to obtain legal certantity.
Chat is never like that you seek to paralyse staff to stop any action.
I guess the questioner has an agenda which is anti Chat Avenue.
I hasten to add that the questioner appears on the ban list of those that set up and assisted NY Stallion set up a site in opposition to Chat Avenue and has no loyalty to here..

Flame
Click to expand...
The questioner is agreeing with what you just said. What he is disagreeing with is why the same "command" isnt being given to the people doing it to him.

To tell one person that theyre doing wrong and then not tell another person doing the same wrong thing is discriminatory. And thats really the core issue here. Not who is tagging who.

Perhaps he is seeking "legal certainty" (whatever that actually means) to hold these people that are being discriminatory to their word.

Thats the way rules and laws work. You cant stop and frisk the black guy walking across the street but tell the white man hes fine. You dont get to "make up" who gets frisked, you set standards and "legal certainty"
 
flame_song said:
So I ask what is the purpose of a tag.
In fast moving chat its to notify the post to the user, as in a mutual conversation as commonally used.

So a hypothetical situation....
I have to ask, if its to tell someone else of there location and highlight it? X tagged is in Y country not involving X?
And a reverse tag to ask them to stop seems warranted.
Perhaps also replying "don't tag me" may not seem warranted.
But the whole thing is to provoke as Karina said to antagonise.

All the time the questioner seeks to refine the rules to obtain legal certantity.
Chat is never like that you seek to paralyse staff to stop any action.
I guess the questioner has an agenda which is anti Chat Avenue.
I hasten to add that the questioner appears on the ban list of those that set up and assisted NY Stallion set up a site in opposition to Chat Avenue and has no loyalty to here..

Flame
Click to expand...
And hypothetically if said person has mentioned live streaming said place to make money? Feels like trying to exploit the safety of Both #1 Chat Avenue and its members, no?
 
ReaganTaylor said:
Exactly. So shut up and quit whining.

And don't make BS threads either, sandwich, because we don't care.
Click to expand...
Ive made 2 threads in girls chat in 4 years.
In the entirety of those 4 years ive not interacted with your comments but til maybe 1 or 2 weeks ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top