Skip to content
CAN I LEGALLY USE THE IMAGE OF A FAMOUS PERSON (WHO’S DEAD)?
- Home
- Lanham Act
- Can I Legally Use The Image of a Famous Person (Who’s Dead)?
24Mar 2022

Every so often, I’m asked by clients and prospective clients alike whether or not it’s permissible for them to use the name, image, or likeness (“NIL”) of a celebrity or famous person who now happens to be deceased. This question was asked of me the other day by clients who wanted to put the face of, oh, let’s just say, Che Guevara, on an article of clothing with some meme-worthy text. Delightful, right? I mean, what’s the big deal; he’s not going to complain, right?
The Right of Publicity
Unfortunately, while the famed Marxist revolutionary might not be around to complain, his estate or heirs likely are. There is a thing in the law known as a person’s right of publicity, which basically deals with one’s right to monetize or exploit their NIL and, yes, this right extends even to deceased individuals (or, more correctly, their estate). This right most typically comes up in the case of celebrities and famous individuals.
While not all of them do, several U.S. states have laws on the books protecting publicity rights of deceased individuals and reserving them to their estate and heirs (California’s being the most notable, for fairly obvious reasons). Therefore, you would have to figure out where the deceased person actually resided or was domiciled and look to see whether that state has such a law in place, as well as what it actually covers.
Isn’t There a First Amendment?
Even if the deceased celebrity was the resident of a state with a recognized right of publicity, all may not yet be lost. Many state’s right of publicity laws also have a carve-out under the First Amendment for expressive works that utilize the NIL of the deceased person in a “transformative” way. That is, the actual value of the thing being used or sold that includes the NIL comes from something separate or apart from the mere identity of the celebrity itself.
Unfortunately, while very cool looking, I had to break the news to the client that their proposed use was not likely to be found to be transformative, since the planned usage was pretty clearly using the NIL of the famous Argentinian as its primary selling point to buyers, as opposed to making any type of actual social commentary or engaging in critical discussion about the specific individual themselves as you might find in, say, a musical, or article, or biopic involving the person.
Lanham Act Concerns
Lastly, while there isn’t a specific right of publicity at the Federal level, there is nonetheless the possible risks of liability at the Federal level by way of The Lanham Act (41 U.S.C. § 1125); namely, claims for false advertising or advertising that could be considered misleading or deceptive. However, for various reasons that are outside of the scope of this article, a Lanham Act claim would be far less effective a route for an estate or heirs of the deceased person to come after you than, say, one of the state-level laws described above. However, in a situation where the deceased famous person or celebrity was a foreign national or domicile cannot be clearly established to fall under a particular state’s requirements, the filing of an action in Federal court might be worth exploring.
The Takeaway
In conclusion, without having some type of permission from the deceased person’s estate or whatever agency or firm manages the publicity rights of the dead celebrity, basically taking a famous person or celebrity’s NIL for your own commercial use is probably just asking for (legal) trouble. As I tried to explain to the client, I would first find out who exactly manages the rights to the NIL properties of the deceased subject and see if you can’t work out some form of non-exclusive, limited license with the rights’ holder.
Ben Bhandhusavee is the Managing Attorney for BHANDLAW, PLLC, a startup, technology, and e-commerce law practice advising founders and management teams on company startup, corporate and technology transactions, e-commerce, as well as Internet privacy concerns. The firm serves corporate and individual clients throughout Arizona, the United States, and internationally. Our offices are conveniently located along the Camelback corridor in Phoenix’s financial district. For more information about our Name, Image & Likeness practice, feel free to reach out using the contact form on the right or call us at (602) 222-5542 to schedule a meeting. Connect with Ben on LinkedIn or Avvo.
Request a Consultation:
Name: *
First
Last
Company:
E-mail: *
Phone: *
I am looking for guidance on (select one): *Domain Dispute (UDRP/ACPA)E-CommerceTrademark/Copyright
Tell us more about your legal matter: *
By clicking 'Submit', you agree that you have read and accept our site's Terms of Use and Office Consultation Policy.
Submit
Recent Posts
Find A Post
Search for:
Post Archives
Post ArchivesSelect Month March 2024 (1) February 2024 (1) January 2024 (1) August 2023 (1) July 2022 (1) March 2022 (1) February 2022 (1) January 2022 (1) November 2021 (2) October 2021 (1) August 2021 (1) July 2021 (2) June 2021 (1) April 2021 (1) March 2021 (1) February 2021 (2) January 2021 (2) December 2020 (1) November 2020 (1) October 2020 (1) September 2020 (4) June 2020 (1) May 2020 (2) April 2020 (1) February 2020 (1) January 2020 (2) December 2019 (2) November 2019 (1) October 2019 (1) September 2019 (1) August 2019 (2) July 2019 (2) May 2019 (4) November 2018 (1) October 2018 (2) July 2018 (1) June 2018 (1) May 2018 (3) April 2018 (1) March 2018 (3) January 2018 (2) December 2017 (3) October 2017 (1) September 2017 (3) June 2017 (4) May 2017 (3) November 2015 (1) July 2015 (1) May 2015 (1) April 2015 (1)
Post Categories
Post CategoriesSelect CategoryArbitration (1)Business Formation (19)Business Libel (1)Business Sale (4)CCPA (1)Celebrity (1)Client Consultation (1)Commercial Leases (1)Common Law Trademark (3)Confidentiality (1)Contracts (18)Copyright (10)Copyright Infringement (7)Corporations (10)COVID-19 (1)Craft Brewing (1)Data Protection (1)Defamation (1)Digital Marketing (1)DMCA (1)Domain Names (2)E-Commerce (8)Employment Agreements (2)Entertainment (4)Entity Formation (9)Foreign Corporation (1)Foreign LLC (2)GDPR (1)Independent Contractor (2)Insurance (1)Intellectual Property (4)Lanham Act (4)Legal Ethics (1)Letter of Intent (1)Licensing (1)Liens (1)Limited Liability Company (17)Misappropriation (1)Name, Image, Likeness (1)Negotiation (3)Non-Disclosure Agreements (1)Non-Disparagement (1)Online Advertising (2)Online Agreements (1)Operating Agreement (5)Popular Culture (4)Privacy (5)Real Estate (1)registration to transact business (1)Restaurants (2)Sale of Business (4)Single Member LLC (4)Social Media (1)Software (2)Sports (1)Start-Up (5)Technology (1)Telephone Consumer Protection Act (2)Terms of Service (6)Trade Names (2)Trade Secrets (1)Trademark (21)Trademark Blurring (1)Trademark Dilution (2)Trademark Infringement (13)UCC (1)UDRP (2)Uncategorized (4)Unfair Competition (6)USPTO (4)Venture Capital (1)Whistleblowing (1)
RECENT POSTS

Every so often, I’m asked by colleagues or other firms to consult on trademark issues or disput...

Can texting an emoji actually bind you to an enforceable contract? As a commercial seller of flax ...

So you have a successful brand and online store but have learned that there's a website, or per...
GETTING HERE
BHANDLAW is a Phoenix law firm advising clients on select e-commerce and intellectual property matters, as well as corporate and technology transactions. The firm’s office is conveniently located along the Camelback corridor in Phoenix’s financial district, a few blocks from the Biltmore Fashion Park and Camelback Esplanade.
SEND A MESSAGE
Your Name *
E-mail Address *
Phone Number *
Your Message *
Submit
CONTACT US
4808 North 22nd St., 2nd Floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Tel: (602) 222-5542
Fax: (602) 277-4507
Terms of Use
Legal Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
Consultation Policy
Copyright © 2024 BHANDLAW, PLLC. All rights reserved
WordPress Theme - Total by HashThemes