SHOULD it be against the rules….

Status
Not open for further replies.

babydolla

Gold Member
…against the rules to register / steal another user’s former username, after having changed it to something else???

hello friends, 🙋🏼‍♀️

dolla here with a brand new poll, a poll about principle, a poll about usernames on a chatroom community…

lots of controversy about the topic, so im bringing it to the floor to see what everyone else thinks about it; if u change your username, should it be against the rules for someone else to register, & use, or does it become fair grounds for being used after the fact it was changed???

i think once u change your name, it becomes open for anyone else to use; but what do i know??? im just an angel 🤷🏼‍♀️

vote & discuss

peace,
god-bless 🕊️🕊️


disclaimer; any similarities in this thread to any user’s situation presently active on chatavenue is purely coincidental, & is not a thread directed specifically towards any specific user 🍜
 
86.7% are agreeing with you though. I’d call that a landslide.

2 of those that disagree have a vested interest, 1 has posted elsewhere today saying that she has bipolar which causes her to make rash decisions, and I don’t know who the other one is

i humbly accept the nomination, & promise to serve with minimum effort in the exact same fashion i already has 🫡

IMG-2103.jpg


no but really,

@H.R. PufnStuf actually has a point (for once 🙊), it is needless drama but its not needless bc its something that happened 6 months ago…

its needless drama bc it happened at all, where action was taken against someone who wasnt actually violating any of the rules that he claims to has been violated, acting well within’ the realm of finders keepers that @Ness_eb has expressed having formal knowledge of in regards to using usernames relinquished by its original maker; which in part took the name away from the person that originally made it, forever keeping her from ever having that name again 💀

something that was childish fun, in which the name would has been eventually returned even if @-Luka never had the formal intention to return it, the name would has been available again eventually regardless bc he would not has wanted to be called fuckin’ princessa forever (😂😂😂) was taken seriously by two people the names former owner, & the admin that banned the two people for using it; one of which simply just made the name innocently after seeing it became available, the only one taking the so-called-quote-unquote-piss out of the situation was luka, @Princessa was a completely innocent bystander that was caught in the crossfire of silliness just bc she finally got a username shes been waiting to use & now bc they were banned with no actual rule being broken nobody can use the name 🤷🏼‍♀️

everyone is voting overwhelmingly no, bc the entire situation is crazy; the owner of the original name should just accept the fact when they give up a name, it becomes up for grabs by anybody & not be a fuckin’ baby about it bc then all this needless drama never would has needlessly needed to happen…
or something to that effect…

😶‍🌫️
 
The UMs were told id change it back after the 30 days were up. However that wasn’t good enough.

Hoping Chatmaster deletes the floorshitters account since she’s court ordered to take meds (and she admitted she had a “bipolar” disorder episode) because as soon as that’s deleted, name getting pinched 🤣
 
In fairness to you, you did offer to return the name. Its unfortunate that there was a 30 day barrier that no one could undo. I respected the fact you offered , because I think you saw how upset people became, (an honourable side of you not eveyone gets to see here) Also unfortunate you did literally trumpet why you took the name.

That was all being sorted, if you remember-but a secondary argument erupted in EE so then you doubled down saying you would prefer to be banned, and the other users name would never be returned. 🤷‍♂️

(This poll wasn't needed, all it did was revive a silly drama most everyone had moved on and learned from and caused un needed debate and words that are hard to take back l Lets not lose sight of that and move forward.)
Yes but there’s a massive difference. A month ban for taking an available username when 2/3 UM’s agreed it was silly when a username called “My Birthday Month January” was used in replace of the coveted Princessa name?

I take my bans tho.

Like if you look at the 2 warnings on my account given by Apollo, technically it’s not warranted. Warnings for “doxxing” the court ordered shít machine yet she has heavily denied it’s her name.

So when Apollo stated she has confirmed it’s her that’s why my posts are getting deleted…. best warn Apollo for doxxing as he confirmed she confirmed it’s her. So he’s doxxed her to me by proxy of her.

-King of the Banned
 
it was just a fun silly poll until someone got their knickers in a twist and got all defensive over it.
space cone has yet to untwist the knickers, which is why this has been A) dragging on for 8 months and C) got so blown out of proportion.

someone over estimated their popularity and then got butthurt.

poll wasnt even directed towards any specific user, specifically 🙂‍↔️

it was purposely formulated to be about the situation at hand, which was being discussed recently in random comments; & whether or not using someone’s former username as your own should be against the rules…

it eludes me completely why / how the ppl who i was specifically trying to avoid making this poll even seem about, managed to inadvertently make it about them 🤷🏼‍♀️

talk about some razzle dazzling, jesus christmas…
 
ok.

I ain't reading any of that boring dribble. No one owns a name. You are using the name of a cartoon character that possibly is trademarked so you should ban yourself. If cow woman drops her name and wants to use another name then she relinquishes her old name. You only protect those psychotic females that feed your tremendous ego in your DM. You need to be like Biden and retire.
 
poll wasnt even directed towards any specific user, specifically 🙂‍↔️

it was purposely formulated to be about the situation at hand, which was being discussed recently in random comments; & whether or not using someone’s former username as your own should be against the rules…

it eludes me completely why / how the ppl who i was specifically trying to avoid making this poll even seem about, managed to inadvertently make it about them 🤷🏼‍♀️

talk about some razzle dazzling, jesus christmas…

Hun, she ALWAYS gonna make it about her. And he ALWAYS gonna come in and make a new rule or gaslight or ban someone over something assinine. Mainly because one of pair is butthurt. No point of before the fact during the fact or after the fact. No point in generalizing it, hiding it or Illuding. Spit it out, say what you gonna say poll what you gonna poll. It's gonna always end the same. Might as well have it all aired out in the open.
 
Then why bother? Some never realise their self importance
Sigh, I don't like men with huge egos to the point it comes out of their mouth, it annoys me, so I get you, I prefer a man with a softie type of personality.
 
Sigh, I don't like men with huge egos to the point it comes out of their mouth, it annoys me, so I get you, I prefer a man with a softie type of personality.

✋🏻 stop

what exactly does your taste in men have to do with whether or not; using someone’s former username after they changed it should be against the rules???

take your garbage can opinions about men to the thread asking what value men has, not here 🙅🏼‍♀️
 
✋🏻 stop

what exactly does your taste in men have to do with whether or not; using someone’s former username after they changed it should be against the rules???

take your garbage can opinions about men to the thread asking what value men has, not here 🙅🏼‍♀️
Hush you, I voted, 💀
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top