🚨 Navy’s Not-Troll Thread 🚨

[emileh]

Last I knew, posting PMs between people, especially staff, wasn't allowed. SO, I'd be happy to if she agrees to share. I noticed she hasn't agreed. Not surprised. Is there anyone here that modding wouldn't have kicked an adult (oh wait....a VIP which I suspect is in play here) and requested a ban for sending nudes to a minor?

She says:

She just doesn't mention it was an adult sending nudes to a minor and discussing how to circumvent being monitored doing it. I kicked for 2 hrs and requested a ban. She reversed it to 5min with a warning. Sending nudes to a minor. And people wonder why mods get accused of being light on predators when you'll ban for posting a link to another chat site?

If I remember correctly, there was no age on the young person's profile which means we can't assume that the adult knew they were dealing with a minor. If that was the case then she's right. I don't know the Gen Chat guidelines but a shorter kick, a strong warning and keeping a close eye on things sounds reasonable under those circumstances.

 

[purplerose]

you in dat pm fam?! then its your s/s to share. you not staff anymore. right now you just full of hot air and making it look like your claim is bull.

what's not allowed but keeps happening is discussing OTHERS ban reasons in public.

 

[NavyWings]

holy-moly, just share the screenshot 🤦🏼‍♀️

at this point u has literally nothin’ to lose, & sharing it would let u save face…

I'm sure they are looking for a reason to ban me now.

If I remember correctly, there was no age on the young person's profile which means we can't assume that the adult knew they were dealing with a minor. If that was the case then she's right. I don't know the Gen Chat guidelines but a shorter kick, a strong warning and keeping a close eye on things sounds reasonable under those circumstances.

There was an age and when you send a PM the profile with age, pops up right in your face.

you in dat pm fam?! then its your s/s to share. you not staff anymore. right now you just full of hot air and making it look like your claim is bull.

what's not allowed but keeps happening is discussing OTHERS ban reasons in public.

There are two people in it and like I said, both need to give their permission as I understand it. I'm happy for a UM to weigh in on that. How about it @leigh? Can I share our discussion on that incident? Including the part where your definition of a P is someone that is sexually attracted to a minor and because he only sent nudes, he did not meet the definition of a P? How about it?

 

[NavyWings]

you in dat pm fam?! then its your s/s to share. you not staff anymore. right now you just full of hot air and making it look like your claim is bull.

what's not allowed but keeps happening is discussing OTHERS ban reasons in public.

Well, technically since they weren't banned, I'm not discussing their ban reason.

 

[babydolla]

I'm sure they are looking for a reason to ban me now

so then what are u losing? if u rly feel that way, they gon’ do it whether u share that screenshot or not 🤷🏼‍♀️

fyi you should probablys just share it, or stop talkin’ about it; right???

bc making continuously wild claims without backin’ them up will be what gets u banned if anything my boy, not this screenie…

food for u know, thought 💡

~*or dont, i dont care*~

 

[Inkandtatts]

In HR’s day, @NavyWings , your thread would have been deleted, you’d suddenly have been banned for a spurious reason, HR would have gone back weeks/months editing threads and PMs and then he’d have made a thread asking for a definition of “nude” from the user base.

As to the specifics, it seems you didn’t stick around long enough for any follow-up and when you quit you lost your ability to have any knowledge of user history or future involvement in discussions about staff actions on users.

Of course, you’re entitled to your perspective but making a troll thread about a room admin who has worked hard to implement positive change after the performance of her predecessor isn’t really fair. Similarly, suggesting a specific requirement for being a mod as you have here, is misleading to prospective applicants hence the disclaimer now added to #1

This has gone on for 3 pages too many

 

[Creed101]

This makes me glad that my room is fourms drama free.

 

[rapinoes smirking revenge]

This makes me glad that my room is fourms drama free.

it's also user free.

 

[VanHelsing]

it's also user free.

🤣

 

[emileh]

I'm sure they are looking for a reason to ban me now.

There was an age and when you send a PM the profile with age, pops up right in your face.

There are two people in it and like I said, both need to give their permission as I understand it. I'm happy for a UM to weigh in on that. How about it @leigh? Can I share our discussion on that incident? Including the part where your definition of a P is someone that is sexually attracted to a minor and because he only sent nudes, he did not meet the definition of a P? How about it?

Nope, not always. Ages on profiles in rooms can be hidden by the user as a part of the privacy settings.

 

[purplerose]

it's also user free.

shhrup! this isn't the place for jokes.... dis be srs thread!!

 

[purplerose]

I'm sure they are looking for a reason to ban me now.

There was an age and when you send a PM the profile with age, pops up right in your face.

There are two people in it and like I said, both need to give their permission as I understand it. I'm happy for a UM to weigh in on that. How about it @leigh? Can I share our discussion on that incident? Including the part where your definition of a P is someone that is sexually attracted to a minor and because he only sent nudes, he did not meet the definition of a P? How about it?

you understand wrongly. dm's aren't shared due to a trust issues. either you trust the other person or they trust you. notice it no longer states private messages. they're called direct messages. its clear you don't trust Leigh to admin the room(s) as you've made several threads announcing how poorly shes doing and (trying to) under minding her. if you know (or feel) as if your getting banned, then post the s/s. you've got nothing left to lose at that point. right now your using the threat of the s/s to keep the argument going. which you were told you could as long as you took it to chat master.

as @Inkandtatts said this has gone on too long. the 1st 2 threads went on too long. it should've been handled in mod forums but you lost that privilege by your own choice.

 

[TheLeigh]

Can I share our discussion on that incident? Including the part where your definition of a P is someone that is sexually attracted to a minor and because he only sent nudes, he did not meet the definition of a P? How about it?

That’s not “my” definition. I’m sure if you looked it up on your own you’d clearly see that.

At the end of the day, the private conversation between you and I doesn’t actually bear any weight to the site’s policy, though, and you also know that to be an accurate statement. All you’re trying to do now is attack me personally, which is also absurd, but have at it.

Also, your incessant need to tailor your posts in a way that tries to insinuate that I, the mods or the owner treated any of what happened as if none of it mattered or wasn’t important to figure out, is disgusting and a complete fallacy - as if I didn’t specifically state to you in said messages that they both would be paid attention to going forward and that they would both be followed up on.

You should legit be ashamed of yourself, and the majority of us know it, but instead of trying to save whatever face you have left, you want to die on this hill. So, ok - you got it.

Here’s a fun thought for that super creative chat novel you’ve been trying to sell everyone:
What if the guy that sent the nude isn’t banned because of a plot twist? 🙂

I’d say I’m looking forward to reading that next chapter of your book, but I’m afraid I’ve essentially just canceled it and all of its future events. 🙃

I’m closing this thread now.
Take it to Chatmaster.
Best of luck to you.
#USNavy 🫡