Racism - re tulsa's disgraceful comment

RandomGuyUK

Silver Member
ok. debate.

Gyat dayum. @RandomGuyUK if you don’t like it don’t read it.

P.s being pro-black =/= anti white. Go crusade against a fucking nazi. The power structure in the U.S is skewed in favor of white males. Racism was baked in from the beginning, hence, there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist. The structure wasn’t built that way. 🤷🏽‍♂️ cry somewhere else.

I will 'cry' in this debate section of the forum, then.

for real? are you serious? ... so ... black people cant be racist?
(who are you, Diane Abbot. ? thats what she said. its a silly viewpoint).

Is racism a simplistic white versus black thing?
only 'white' people can be 'racist'?. perpetrators.?

come on man, racism isnt a black vs white thing.
racism is hating on people for the colour of their skin (both black and white, and all every peoples), and also ethnic origin.

question - how would you describe the Tutsi, Hulu genocide in Rwanda?
both peoples were black African.
they hated each other, based on race.
millions of humans died. murdered because of race-hate.

And furthermore, how about Islam?
The Malcom X quotes paint a pretty picture of Islam.
but it isn't true.
Arabic Muslims look down on their darker-skinned cousins.
(generally). They do. It's not nice, nor pleasant to think about. But it's true.
 
generally speaking ... humans prefer to be with people who walk, talk, and are similar to themselves.
fundamental truth.

I guess that is partly why people here get along.
we are all a bit weird.

tulsa. no hate to you. But what you said is definitely debatable.
"there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist."
angry hatred to people based on race alone. Racism, man!.

"400 years of slavery". is a total lie, also.
victim mentality.

200 years, MAX. 1600 to 1800.
Which is still not good, I know.

yet, if we glance at human history over the last 4000 years, and more. all recorded history. We see that slavery is the norm.
And yet, again. who stopped the the slave trade? white people. eg william wilberforce.

The spanish started the african slave trade.
The Royal Navy ended it.

England, Britain, RN ended that.
give some respect to Britain for that.
some appreciation for history.


and tulsa - racism is alive and well
it's not black vs white. it's all ethnic tensions. all colours, all ethnicities.
 
generally speaking ... humans prefer to be with people who walk, talk, and are similar to themselves.
fundamental truth.

I guess that is partly why people here get along.
we are all a bit weird.

tulsa. no hate to you. But what you said is definitely debatable.
"there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist."
angry hatred to people based on race alone. Racism, man!.

"400 years of slavery". is a total lie, also.
victim mentality.

200 years, MAX. 1600 to 1800.
Which is still not good, I know.

yet, if we glance at human history over the last 4000 years, and more. all recorded history. We see that slavery is the norm.
And yet, again. who stopped the the slave trade? white people. eg william wilberforce.

The spanish started the african slave trade.
The Royal Navy ended it.

England, Britain, RN ended that.
give some respect to Britain for that.
some appreciation for history.


and tulsa - racism is alive and well
it's not black vs white. it's all ethnic tensions. all colours, all ethnicities.
oh shut up ya blithering fool - I have known Tulsa for a long time he would never be racist about anyone
 
oh shut up ya blithering fool - I have known Tulsa for a long time he would never be racist about anyone

ok active.
i was very careful to be polite and not say rude things in this thread.
(maybe my thread title could have been better tho, admittedly).

how do you explain this comment?
"there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist."
"The power structure in the U.S is skewed in favor of white males. Racism was baked in from the beginning, hence, there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist. The structure wasn’t built that way. "

thus and therefore, 'only whites are racist'.

That's how so-called 'progressives' are trying to redefine the simple word 'racism'.
So ... racism ... isnt about 'race'? wut?

It's about "power structures" in society.
left wing bullshit, my friend.

I bet you both like 'affirmative action'; hiring people based on race, not on merit.

tulsa made a mistake ... saying "P.s being pro-black =/= anti white."
That is pretty much how it is.

Oh and btw, the so-called 'power structure' is skewed in favour of middle class people with money.
many many working class white males in the US and Britain might disagree with that "power structure" idea you have. tulse.

ban active.
it's discussion. debate.
refrain from name calling.
 
Gah. You’re dense. The constitution was racially biased from the rip. In favor of white men. Pax Americana (and pax Britannia for the matter) was built upon the backs of slaves and their labor.
Your argument is flimsy because it’s built upon privilege.
Your speaking points are garbage and your attempt at saving face by stating that you weren’t rude (you were) is laughable.
There has never been a law written that affects the white community SPECIFICALLY, while there have been a plethora of laws written that affect brown communities SPECIFICALLY. That’s why it matters.
how do you explain this comment?
"there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist."
"The power structure in the U.S is skewed in favor of white males. Racism was baked in from the beginning, hence, there’s no possible way Malcolm X could have been racist. The structure wasn’t built that way

I’m not speaking for England. I’m ignorant of policy in England. I do not live there.

Here in the US there have been many laws written that affect communities negatively and specifically.

The point being. Yes sure. You can be hateful of a group of people based on the color of their skin. From any group. Directed at any other group. Racism in the United States is institutional though. It’s always been directed at minorities. You can see it in the different ways the groups are treated. White pointy hats matching the streets armed? Cops are there to “keep the peace” . They’re allowed to spew their hatred. What happens to armed minority groups? They’re treated as criminals and persecuted and attacked via channels of power sanctioned by the government.

So yea. I’ll stand on that hill. In the United States, since Racism is institutionalized, one cannot be racist and a minority, only hateful.


Oh and btw, the so-called 'power structure' is skewed in favour of middle class people with money.

And this ^ is literally hogwash. The system supports unchecked capitalism and the middle class is wiped tf out. There’s soon to be a trillionaire, supposedly, which is ludicrous.

I think that you’re correct that we should be focused on the class war at hand (haves/have nots) instead of racial issues BUT it would be absolutely stupid to forget what has happened lest we lose the small amount of social progress we have made.
 
Oh. And one more thing. Tend your garden before you tell me how to tend my own.

The amount of blood spilled by any sort of minority group is dwarfed by the blood spilled by empires. Let’s talk about the rape and pillaging of literally every culture pax Britannia came into contact with along the way. Followed by the decimation of native peoples by Pax Americana. Forceful ejection of Mexican and mestizo people. Don’t even get me started on Puerto Rico. Or Hawaii. Or Iraq. Or Iran.
 
I am not dense. please REFRAIN from name-calling.
I'm not insulting you.


You are both right.
salient, and very true, points, i guess.

my original comment was a bit 'blithering' ... maybe so yes.

but surely .... racism is about 'race hatred' ... ... isnt it? Is it not ??


we should remember the past, because it informs the present. ... yes ... definitely.
But also, we should, could ... have some perspective in life too.

We should take a step back, and try and view history objectively.
"the amount of blood spilled" in the Rwandan genocide was absolutely awful.
I do not agree with you when u say 'The amount of blood spilled by any sort of minority group is dwarfed by the blood spilled by empires.'

the history of humanity is 'empires'.

black, white, or asian, indian, etc.
way back to the Sumerian Empire, etc.

history is a sh it-show. heh.
is it not?
 
The constitution was racially biased from the rip. In favor of white men. Pax Americana (and pax Britannia for the matter) was built upon the backs of slaves and their labor.
i can't argue with that.
but times are different now, arent they?
 
Who's fighting with ma tulsi gabbard, director, national intelligence?

Kermit The Frog No GIF by Muppet Wiki
 
Oh. And one more thing. Tend your garden before you tell me how to tend my own.

OKAY

The amount of blood spilled by any sort of minority group is dwarfed by the blood spilled by empires. Let’s talk about the rape and pillaging of literally every culture pax Britannia came into contact with along the way. Followed by the decimation of native peoples by Pax Americana. Forceful ejection of Mexican and mestizo people. Don’t even get me started on Puerto Rico. Or Hawaii. Or Iraq. Or Iran.

OKAY. SO. ...
What are your thoughts about the Zulu Empire?

That was an empire. a black empire.
An aggressive empire, in Africa.

They fucked up every other people around them.
'minority'. ... really?
nah, they were the majority.

until the British came and whipped them (and stole their lands, too, yes.)


so. i mean ... raping and pillaging. is not the prerogative of WHITES only.
it's a human thing.
it isnt pretty, it isnt nice. but it is history.

But I do understand that the American experience is different.
I totally get that.
 
discussion. debate

like JS Mill said - we learn through the clash of truth and error. And discussion. friendly discussion.
(I paraphrase that quote, but you know what i mean?)

please don't be rude and call me names.

if you look into the abyss, it might look back right at ya.
(IE. i am volatile. if you call me names i may well respond in kind).
SO SO peaceful damn discussion, people. please?
 
i can't argue with that.
but times are different now, arent they?
Maybe I was heavy handed in saying you are dense. Ignorant ? Not using that term in any way to diminish your intelligence. I can tell by how you speak that you are intelligent.
It’s not different. Same systemic problems. Different avenues of injustice. Legal avenues of producing the same outcome, slavery, through financial means.


I am not dense. please REFRAIN from name-calling.
I'm not insulting you.


You are both right.
salient, and very true, points, i guess.

my original comment was a bit 'blithering' ... maybe so yes.

but surely .... racism is about 'race hatred' ... ... isnt it? Is it not ??


we should remember the past, because it informs the present. ... yes ... definitely.
But also, we should, could ... have some perspective in life too.

We should take a step back, and try and view history objectively.
"the amount of blood spilled" in the Rwandan genocide was absolutely awful.
I do not agree with you when u say 'The amount of blood spilled by any sort of minority group is dwarfed by the blood spilled by empires.'

the history of humanity is 'empires'.

black, white, or asian, indian, etc.
way back to the Sumerian Empire, etc.

history is a sh it-show. heh.
is it not?
Here in this you have proven my point. You’re just using gymnastics to get there that aren’t necessary.
Empires have, in modern history, been white. Roman ideology is extremely violent. The empire was the problem. If that empire was not in modern history it was still extremely violent. The empire, from any time in history, was the problem. You asked me about the Zulu empire. I had to go and do some reading. They were a resistance force. Resisting who ? Pax Britannia.
I agree with you that humanity is very violent, as a whole. There are degrees to this though, and I’d like to highlight these different degrees as a way to help you understand the other side of the fence. You seem to be a proud part of the British empire. You seem to think that it has done more good than harm. I would encourage you to take a step back and ask “for who?” Since the modern version of “empire” has been white, it is hard to broach this subject, which history books inevitably teach in a biased way to favor white peoples (they were the winners), in a way that doesn’t damage the image or otherwise sound racist. It’s NOT racism though, to say that empire has been good for one group of people and not so good for the other. Empire has been good for white people, and it has been horrible for everyone else. . There are many examples. Many many examples. Examples that will forever be thought of as less than horrible because they were not perpetrated against white people. Take any one of these examples and ask yourself if you’ve ever heard of them being performed on white people. The Tuskegee experiments come to mind. The testing of birth control on unsuspecting women in Puerto Rico. The outright sterilization of Native American women, without their consent, clear into the late sixties and early seventies. The rounding up of Latinos and their placements in things that could have no other proper naming besides “concentration” camps.
The argument could be made that “good things” have been made possible by these experiments, but the question is, good things for who? In a world where brown people are systemically beaten down with money, they benefit white people, because white people have the money to access them.
Objectivity of history is hard to pin down. It is ever colored by the favoritism of the winners.
I would however like to close my argument speaking about violence and how it differs between native cultures and cultures influenced by empire. Violence has always been, and probably will always be a part of humanity. The violence of an empire is different though. Sure, Native Americans skirmished between each other before European settlers arrived. They didn’t seek total annihilation though. There were no chemical weapons.. there was no biological attack (think small pox infested blankets ). There were no atomic bombs. Also. Imagine someone coming to your home, entering your land, and telling you to leave. Imagine being okay with that. Then understand beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you would not be okay with that. This is what empire has done to literally every group of people they have ever come into contact with.

I enjoy modernity as much as the next person. The so called “benefits” of the empire allow for many things that I don’t see as necessary or beneficial to humanity as a whole though. Consumerism is a scourge. The pipe dream of a eutopian society where no one has to work is abhorrent to me. One because I don’t think it will benefit everyone equally (read as “the billionaires will be the only ones seeing the benefit”), and two because laziness is a killer in and of itself. Forgive my crass points if they in any way have insulted you, but in the spirit of being crass, actions of the empire should insult you. We are in the midst of an era where corporations control everything. The sad part is that for those of us who have not experienced the preferential treatment of the empire, life is just business as usual, but, for those of you who have, it will be a very sad awakening to understand that the empire is not here to help even white people anymore, it seeks to enrich itself at the expense of literally the entire planet.
 
Maybe I was heavy handed in saying you are dense. Ignorant ? Not using that term in any way to diminish your intelligence. I can tell by how you speak that you are intelligent.
It’s not different. Same systemic problems. Different avenues of injustice. Legal avenues of producing the same outcome, slavery, through financial means.



Here in this you have proven my point. You’re just using gymnastics to get there that aren’t necessary.
Empires have, in modern history, been white. Roman ideology is extremely violent. The empire was the problem. If that empire was not in modern history it was still extremely violent. The empire, from any time in history, was the problem. You asked me about the Zulu empire. I had to go and do some reading. They were a resistance force. Resisting who ? Pax Britannia.
I agree with you that humanity is very violent, as a whole. There are degrees to this though, and I’d like to highlight these different degrees as a way to help you understand the other side of the fence. You seem to be a proud part of the British empire. You seem to think that it has done more good than harm. I would encourage you to take a step back and ask “for who?” Since the modern version of “empire” has been white, it is hard to broach this subject, which history books inevitably teach in a biased way to favor white peoples (they were the winners), in a way that doesn’t damage the image or otherwise sound racist. It’s NOT racism though, to say that empire has been good for one group of people and not so good for the other. Empire has been good for white people, and it has been horrible for everyone else. . There are many examples. Many many examples. Examples that will forever be thought of as less than horrible because they were not perpetrated against white people. Take any one of these examples and ask yourself if you’ve ever heard of them being performed on white people. The Tuskegee experiments come to mind. The testing of birth control on unsuspecting women in Puerto Rico. The outright sterilization of Native American women, without their consent, clear into the late sixties and early seventies. The rounding up of Latinos and their placements in things that could have no other proper naming besides “concentration” camps.
The argument could be made that “good things” have been made possible by these experiments, but the question is, good things for who? In a world where brown people are systemically beaten down with money, they benefit white people, because white people have the money to access them.
Objectivity of history is hard to pin down. It is ever colored by the favoritism of the winners.
I would however like to close my argument speaking about violence and how it differs between native cultures and cultures influenced by empire. Violence has always been, and probably will always be a part of humanity. The violence of an empire is different though. Sure, Native Americans skirmished between each other before European settlers arrived. They didn’t seek total annihilation though. There were no chemical weapons.. there was no biological attack (think small pox infested blankets ). There were no atomic bombs. Also. Imagine someone coming to your home, entering your land, and telling you to leave. Imagine being okay with that. Then understand beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you would not be okay with that. This is what empire has done to literally every group of people they have ever come into contact with.

I enjoy modernity as much as the next person. The so called “benefits” of the empire allow for many things that I don’t see as necessary or beneficial to humanity as a whole though. Consumerism is a scourge. The pipe dream of a eutopian society where no one has to work is abhorrent to me. One because I don’t think it will benefit everyone equally (read as “the billionaires will be the only ones seeing the benefit”), and two because laziness is a killer in and of itself. Forgive my crass points if they in any way have insulted you, but in the spirit of being crass, actions of the empire should insult you. We are in the midst of an era where corporations control everything. The sad part is that for those of us who have not experienced the preferential treatment of the empire, life is just business as usual, but, for those of you who have, it will be a very sad awakening to understand that the empire is not here to help even white people anymore, it seeks to enrich itself at the expense of literally the entire planet.

my thread title was stupid,
I should have considered the title first before posting.

... oh and I understand why you called me dense earlier. it's fine.
i didnt mean to be stupid, or annoy you.
honestly, truly. I didnt mean to.

I will give your reply a read.
and i will reply soon.
btw, Thanks for taking the time to reply
respect
 
25 years in the Navy, you learn allot. One main thing is your life can be in the hands of a person of any ethnic heritage or religion or sexual persuasion .... So you learn very fast to see pople for who they are, not what they believe, what color their skin is, who the love and if the believe in a god of any kind.
I forgot age, 18-22 year olds are plane captains and you better believe that if you are driving the plane you love you Plane Captain.

They might be the on packing your parachute.
 
Maybe I was heavy handed in saying you are dense. Ignorant ? Not using that term in any way to diminish your intelligence. I can tell by how you speak that you are intelligent.
It’s not different. Same systemic problems. Different avenues of injustice. Legal avenues of producing the same outcome, slavery, through financial means.



Here in this you have proven my point. You’re just using gymnastics to get there that aren’t necessary.
Empires have, in modern history, been white. Roman ideology is extremely violent. The empire was the problem. If that empire was not in modern history it was still extremely violent. The empire, from any time in history, was the problem. You asked me about the Zulu empire. I had to go and do some reading. They were a resistance force. Resisting who ? Pax Britannia.
I agree with you that humanity is very violent, as a whole. There are degrees to this though, and I’d like to highlight these different degrees as a way to help you understand the other side of the fence. You seem to be a proud part of the British empire. You seem to think that it has done more good than harm. I would encourage you to take a step back and ask “for who?” Since the modern version of “empire” has been white, it is hard to broach this subject, which history books inevitably teach in a biased way to favor white peoples (they were the winners), in a way that doesn’t damage the image or otherwise sound racist. It’s NOT racism though, to say that empire has been good for one group of people and not so good for the other. Empire has been good for white people, and it has been horrible for everyone else. . There are many examples. Many many examples. Examples that will forever be thought of as less than horrible because they were not perpetrated against white people. Take any one of these examples and ask yourself if you’ve ever heard of them being performed on white people. The Tuskegee experiments come to mind. The testing of birth control on unsuspecting women in Puerto Rico. The outright sterilization of Native American women, without their consent, clear into the late sixties and early seventies. The rounding up of Latinos and their placements in things that could have no other proper naming besides “concentration” camps.
The argument could be made that “good things” have been made possible by these experiments, but the question is, good things for who? In a world where brown people are systemically beaten down with money, they benefit white people, because white people have the money to access them.
Objectivity of history is hard to pin down. It is ever colored by the favoritism of the winners.
I would however like to close my argument speaking about violence and how it differs between native cultures and cultures influenced by empire. Violence has always been, and probably will always be a part of humanity. The violence of an empire is different though. Sure, Native Americans skirmished between each other before European settlers arrived. They didn’t seek total annihilation though. There were no chemical weapons.. there was no biological attack (think small pox infested blankets ). There were no atomic bombs. Also. Imagine someone coming to your home, entering your land, and telling you to leave. Imagine being okay with that. Then understand beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you would not be okay with that. This is what empire has done to literally every group of people they have ever come into contact with.

I enjoy modernity as much as the next person. The so called “benefits” of the empire allow for many things that I don’t see as necessary or beneficial to humanity as a whole though. Consumerism is a scourge. The pipe dream of a eutopian society where no one has to work is abhorrent to me. One because I don’t think it will benefit everyone equally (read as “the billionaires will be the only ones seeing the benefit”), and two because laziness is a killer in and of itself. Forgive my crass points if they in any way have insulted you, but in the spirit of being crass, actions of the empire should insult you. We are in the midst of an era where corporations control everything. The sad part is that for those of us who have not experienced the preferential treatment of the empire, life is just business as usual, but, for those of you who have, it will be a very sad awakening to understand that the empire is not here to help even white people anymore, it seeks to enrich itself at the expense of literally the entire planet.

you make some very valid pertinent points.

The British and American experiences of systemic slavery are very different.
That is true.

But No-one was a slave in England, not since the Viking times.
King Cnut, and his northern Norse empire... that was an empire too wasnt it? with slaves.
And the Romans and all other empires...
It wasnt racial, but it was still slavery.

One could make the point that all working class people in the 19th century - and indeed now - were slaves in all but name. Financially.

You haven't read enough about the Zulu Empire.
It wasn't resistant. They were an aggressive, expansionist empire, before Britain invaded.

"Empires have, in modern history, been white". European, yes.
but as you mentioned ... other empires such as the Aztecs, Mayans, mezoitic? ... they werent great either.

I am proud to be a Brit, and I know it wasn't great. it was very bad.
HOWEVER. compared to all the other 'modern' 'white' empires ... the Brits ... were the best.
We built roads, infrastructure, civil government.

what did the Spanish do in their south american colonies? or the French. and Belgians. ... or the NAZIS?
Britain was better than the others.
Britain was a bit better than the alternatives.
wasn't it?
yes i am proud.

But the actions of my ancestors - for good or ill - are a) not my fault and b) something i cannot be proud of.
past life - is history. History is nuanced. Let's not hate and bear grudges. basically.
 
Top