suggestion : use AI mods instead of Human mods

K

Kramer318usa

Member
AI mods would be much more effective than human mods. First of all there would be 24/7/365 coverage and second we would avoid the biased-human mods (for example DRock).


Yes, AI bots are highly effective at moderating chat rooms. They can instantly detect and filter out spam, harassment, and explicit content across live chats, multiplayer games, and forums. They execute real-time actions like muting, deleting, or banning disruptive users to keep conversations safe
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Hey @Kramer318usa, I fed your extensive action history and Gen chat rules into AI. Here is the AI Analysis... Let us know if you still want AI mods:

Overall, was the user actioned according to the rules, and not any bias?

Yes — based on the history and the written rules, the moderation actions overall appear to have been primarily rule-based rather than driven by personal bias.

The key reasons are:

  • The user repeatedly violated clearly stated rules:
    • slurs/banned words
    • harassment/insults
    • racist comments
    • sexual comments in a PG-13 room
    • trolling/disruption
    • evasion using guest/alternate accounts
    • mini-modding/report abuse
    • posting prohibited links/VPN discussion
    • doxxing allegations
  • The rules explicitly state:

    “Habitual and/or Repetitive offenders will not be warned.”
    Click to expand...
  • The moderation followed a recognizable escalation pattern:
    • warnings → short kicks → short ghosts → longer ghosts
    • which is standard moderation practice for repeat offenders.
  • Multiple different moderators issued actions over months:

Overall Conclusion​


An AI moderator would probably:


  • still classify this user as a chronic repeat offender,
  • still escalate punishments over time,
  • and likely still end up issuing long kicks/suspensions of account.
 
I asked Ai to make me a silly cartoon picture about a birthday party. It gave people 3 arms, more than 10 fingers, and the birthday party was in a pub from 1107. So, no.
 
Drock said:
Hey @Kramer318usa, I fed your extensive action history and Gen chat rules into AI. Here is the AI Analysis... Let us know if you still want AI mods:

Overall, was the user actioned according to the rules, and not any bias?

Yes — based on the history and the written rules, the moderation actions overall appear to have been primarily rule-based rather than driven by personal bias.

The key reasons are:

  • The user repeatedly violated clearly stated rules:
    • slurs/banned words
    • harassment/insults
    • racist comments
    • sexual comments in a PG-13 room
    • trolling/disruption
    • evasion using guest/alternate accounts
    • mini-modding/report abuse
    • posting prohibited links/VPN discussion
    • doxxing allegations
  • The rules explicitly state:

  • The moderation followed a recognizable escalation pattern:
    • warnings → short kicks → short ghosts → longer ghosts
    • which is standard moderation practice for repeat offenders.
  • Multiple different moderators issued actions over months:

Overall Conclusion​


An AI moderator would probably:


  • still classify this user as a chronic repeat offender,
  • still escalate punishments over time,
  • and likely still end up issuing long kicks/suspensions of account.
Click to expand...
I put this in AI and it said Ban , too much patience with repeat offenders now days.
 
I think, if not doing all the tasks of a mod, tackling spammers, flooders and cp posts would be a huge help to allow mods to focus on the borderline issues. I think the AI would be faster at spotting and recognizing common patterns as soon as it hits the room and the flooders would propbably not even be able to get in a second post.
 
There was a chat room not CA but they had a robot mod. It actually worked well and you did not have all this inbred fighting we see here. The only problem with the chat robot mod was that you could asked it a series of questions and get it to flood the room.
 
Kramer318usa said:
AI mods would be much more effective than human mods. First of all there would be 24/7/365 coverage and second we would avoid the biased-human mods (for example DRock).


Yes, AI bots are highly effective at moderating chat rooms. They can instantly detect and filter out spam, harassment, and explicit content across live chats, multiplayer games, and forums. They execute real-time actions like muting, deleting, or banning disruptive users to keep conversations safe
Click to expand...
**** you and your stupid fucking suggestions.
No way I want this chat to be efficient and free from all the tribalism.
I like the circlejerking environment here which the mods and admins try their best to maintain.
I'd advise you to do the same and stop complaining.
 
Despite the original comment's motivation as replacing the apparent bias of human mods, I don't think using AI to assist the mods is such a bad idea. It could provide a good back up to the team, perhaps flagging potentially inappropriate messages or users in distress for human attention, or even muting problematic messages until a mod could review.
 
Kramer318usa said:
AI mods would be much more effective than human mods. First of all there would be 24/7/365 coverage and second we would avoid the biased-human mods (for example DRock).


Yes, AI bots are highly effective at moderating chat rooms. They can instantly detect and filter out spam, harassment, and explicit content across live chats, multiplayer games, and forums. They execute real-time actions like muting, deleting, or banning disruptive users to keep conversations safe
Click to expand...
Spot on. AI mods way more effective, impartial, accurate, professional. Of course all mods gonna be butthurt barking for losing their power but they'll learn to get over it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top