random comments (2)

Wednesday Morning GIF by MOODMAN
 
Me, the above mentioned Cat Jr.,Purplerose, Luka, Screem, Luka, Vonnie, Mimsy forums only,and Alaskan Woman has been here a long time, still searching for STDs free men
 
My post got edited and asked for proof of Gaschan's grooming. @Inkandtatts is well aware of it I think, and I know for a fact Apollo did. I think most regs whove been here for five years or more are aware of it too. The fact hes even denying hes Gaschan, when UMs can probably see his name changes, is an admission of guilt.
 
My post got edited and asked for proof of Gaschan's grooming. @Inkandtatts is well aware of it I think, and I know for a fact Apollo did. I think most regs whove been here for five years or more are aware of it too. The fact hes even denying hes Gaschan, when UMs can probably see his name changes, is an admission of guilt.
Gas chan was found out to be dating an underage girl while being in his early-mid 20's (he openly admitted to it without duress). I'm mind-blown that he has been allowed to return after the previous ban expired
 
Gas chan was found out to be dating an underage girl while being in his early-mid 20's (he openly admitted to it without duress). I'm mind-blown that he has been allowed to return after the previous ban expired
Cant they just look at the history? I dont know whats need to even be proven, that its Gas Chan, or what Gas Chan did?
 
Cant they just look at the history? I dont know whats need to even be proven, that its Gas Chan, or what Gas Chan did?
Unsure but your statement draws parallels to a similar topic recently approached (about someone else). In that scenario a ban wasn't being requested so I'll make a distinction; are you requesting them to ban him? If so pm the UMs with evidence.

Highly unlikely anyone else would keep receipts from his historical admissions (unless maybe the gatekeeper of records - @purplerose).

But I remember him admitting it publicly in a post on forums (I didnt save proof of this) but he was actioned for it so I support where you're coming from. I can only assume they can see what previous actions have been taken
 
i call this a pick your own adventure

choice A: forums was reset a few different times. when that happens everything goes poof.

choice B: The Blind still cannot see.


@Coyo i gate keep it all. last time i freely shared with an imbecile um on a promise to ban bac if there was proof, the um called me a sIut. and suggested i was a pm whore. i wont make that mistake twice. if/when they are serious about removing they know how to pm.
 
i call this a pick your own adventure

choice A: forums was reset a few different times. when that happens everything goes poof.

choice B: The Blind still cannot see.
I've witnessed you actually call a spade a spade continuously throughout my time here, I can see both of the given options as feasible
@Coyo i gate keep it all. last time i freely shared with an imbecile um on a promise to ban bac if there was proof, the um called me a sIut. and suggested i was a pm whore. i wont make that mistake twice. if/when they are serious about removing they know how to pm.
Criticism comes with the job, what a standard of professionalism to set
 
But I remember him admitting it publicly in a post on forums (I didnt save proof of this) but he was actioned for it so I support where you're coming from. I can only assume they can see what previous actions have been taken
Thank you. I dont know why Im getting passive aggressive behavior just for pointing this out. I did that and said something stupid about Alaskanwoman. Im not being disruptive or a menace.
 
Top