Are people in prison allowed on here?

[Deleted member 292068]

I have proof of a user who is currently in prison on drug trafficking and is banned in Gen chat (or was). I've never seen this question asked, but I figured I'd ask. I personally don't think they should even be allowed a phone or the ability to communicate with the outside World. On another chat site, there was a guy who cat fished women and ended up being an inmate in for life for killing and robbing a pawn shop owner.

@DynamicDylan I can provide proof if need be. He just swung by and helped himself to a mild stroke and spammed the room about rabbis. He think he might be listening to too much Ye.

 

[Deleted member 296604]

@GFB everyone was on topic until HR and Difference started attacking boba fett lol. they just aren't as good as everyone else at that game because they defend p's so people have lots of easy shots. they wanted to play a dumb game, and they won a dumb prize.

Hmm, I understand! Anyway, but here's the tip, in case yous want to get more people engaged in your topics. Not everyone has the courage to speak their minds, so we can't lose what little we have. You know? We need to catch them all and support them too.

 

[Deleted member 292068]

@GFB everyone was on topic until HR and Difference started attacking boba fett lol. they just aren't as good as everyone else at that game because they defend p's so people have lots of easy shots. they wanted to play a dumb game, and they won a dumb prize.

I mean, what guy in their 50's makes their whole identity based on a children's puppet show about some lizard that goes around kidnapping kids for "their own good"?

 

[Deleted member 296604]

I mean, what guy in their 50's makes their whole identity based on a children's puppet show about some lizard that goes around kidnapping kids for "their own good"?

I end my participation in today's debate, because I need to go now. Good night, Boba! See you later! Bye!

 

[Deleted member 292068]

I end my participation here in today's debate, because I need to go now. Good night, Boba! See you later! Bye!

Same, take care!

 

[SouporMan]

What’s most concerning here, is how many people are trying to defend a convict using chat avenue.

The website shouldn’t allow convicts and children. Your answer as a staff member should be, we don’t allow inmates. Then ignore the rest.

@H.R. PufnStuf you are out of control with gas lighting, and you are also in a position of power. I’m confused why you think you can **** post our threads and then aim to close them. The very small amount of authority you have on this website has really gone to your head.

 

[Deleted member 292068]

What’s most concerning here, is how many people are trying to defend a convict using chat avenue.

The website shouldn’t allow convicts and children. Your answer as a staff member should be, we don’t allow inmates. Then ignore the rest.

@H.R. PufnStuf you are out of control with gas lighting, and you are also in a position of power. I’m confused why you think you can **** post our threads and then aim to close them. The very small amount of authority you have on this website has really gone to your head.

It's scary and new people who come here, see him and think "this site isn't for me". Look around, no one has a problem with any other UMs, they're good people and they only interfere if it's a last resort. If you go back before he was ADMIN, there's a lot of threads still open, because it should be like that in case there's an update and the thread can be bumped. Most of his threads, he's locked then edits crap and adds his two cents so no one can defend themselves. He's even edited posts multiple times to make others look like they're in the wrong or the instigator.


You're right, a simple "prisoners shouldn't be allowed on a site with children" would be suffice, but my thread is solid proof that some have backwards thinking which was part of the reason I made it. I knew there would be people who just wanted to argue about giving prisoners rights when the whole purpose of them being in prison is because they lost their rights/freedom.

 

[TheDifference]

@GFB everyone was on topic until HR and Difference started attacking boba fett lol. they just aren't as good as everyone else at that game because they defend p's so people have lots of easy shots. they wanted to play a dumb game, and they won a dumb prize.

You’ve been warned once. You continue to say that I defend pedos when I don’t. I’m recommending a temporary ban from the forums. If you continue you’ll be removed from the forums permanently. Enough is enough.

 

[Frombo]

well stop defending people who defend p's and you might not be looped in with them. again, play dumb games and you win dumb prizes. like i said you all start to look alike after awhile. i still can't entirely tell if I'm responding to HR, Jared Fogle or Difference right now.

 

[Frombo]

also: typical chat ave, trying to ban the guy speaking out against p's and the people who defend them rather than go after the p's. that is such typical chat ave logic lmaooo. you dont like being looped in with HR? stop defending the guy who defends p's.

"Yes I did visit Jeffrey's Island but thats only because I like Jeffrey all I did was go there for sandwichs, dont loop me in with him"

thats how you sound rn @TheDifference

 

[purplerose]

You’ve been warned once. You continue to say that I defend pedos when I don’t. I’m recommending a temporary ban from the forums. If you continue you’ll be removed from the forums permanently. Enough is enough.

your a chat mod. you dont get to "recommend" anything. on top of that your "recommendation" would be for personal reasons. and if you were as fair as you state you wouldnt be "recommending" anything.

 

[Deleted member 292068]

your a chat mod. you dont get to "recommend" anything. on top of that your "recommendation" would be for personal reasons. and if you were as fair as you state you wouldnt be "recommending" anything.

I was going to say that. Is he really that delusional?

 

[Deleted member 263960]

 

[Deleted member 298531]

 

[amberbi14f]

Main problem is many of the mods and admins have ego problems. If they would check them at the door before coming on duty in their respective rooms, it will all be good. It’s all volunteer work and not worthy of power tripping. Unfortunately, it won’t ever change. Some can lead and others cannot.

 

[Apollo]

Look, I understand what you *mean* and *want* but it doesn't change the thread title and the question posed. If you want change and you want there to be a rule that if someone says they're a prisoner that they be actionable based on that alone, then I suggest saying that instead of just beating around the bush and making a general query.

I think you should've posted, "I think claiming to be a prisoner here should be a bannable offense since it's a 13+ site." And then it could be settled whether that's going to be implemented or not. It's a semantics argument because you guys made it one.

I'm not going to engage you anymore because you're not getting it and now putting words into my mouth. This thread can be closed. I'm glad most people seem to agree with my concern and suggestion, at least.

Agree, and done.