Bring swearing back to Kids Chat Ave

Samanhelm said:
My QUESTION wasn’t about your mothers job it was asking you if as a parent you would allow your children to go onto a site where they can say whatever they want as they please.
Click to expand...
Yes and I gave you my parent's response as an example. Hint: That's what context is.
 
emileh said:
Yes and I gave you my parent's response as an example. Hint: That's what context is.
Click to expand...
So you are your parents? That’s not what I asked you…. So your mom says it’s cool therefore you’d say to your kids it’s cool because your mom said it was cool. So you don’t raise your children? Your mom would? L M A O
 
Samanhelm said:
They are relevant. You just decided they aren’t because they don’t appeal to your outcome.
Click to expand...
No, they're not relevant to the focus of the debate. They're a classic example of a straw man argument. Your responses are all over the place and using a straw man is desperate stuff. Focus please.
 
Samanhelm said:
It’s funny how you’re like the only one having to finish your replies with backhanded remarks when I’ve kept my cool the ENTIRE time.
Click to expand...
You're joking, right? You're the one that's resorted to abusive arguments. I've been using rational discourse throughout.
 
emileh said:
No, they're not relevant to the focus of the debate. They're a classic example of a straw man argument. Your responses are all over the place and using a straw man is desperate stuff. Focus please.
Click to expand...
Yeah you’re the one making them all over the place. Take for example how you don’t reply to anything that defeats your argument and only to things that can prolong it. You are just dodging questions so I’ll just end it flat out and say this




Should children be allowed to be toxic on the internet

Yes

No


I’ve made it more simplified so you don’t have to rub your 2 braincells together and make a fire in your brain.
 
Anyway, it's 01:00 here (24 hour clock for elimination of doubt) and I have an early start in the morning. I'll leave you to rant and no doubt claim some sort of non-existent victory. Goodnight.
 
emileh said:
You're joking, right? You're the one that's resorted to abusive arguments. I've been using rational discourse throughout.
Click to expand...
I’m sure. Which is exactly why you started replying to my other thread that I made yesterday saying that I was smoking something which is most likely a nuance for you saying I’m a drug addict. That’s stigmatization and an abusive tactic Ms.ScottishSoISwearOmalley
 
emileh said:
Anyway, it's 01:00 here (24 hour clock for elimination of doubt) and I have an early start in the morning. I'll leave you to rant and no doubt claim some sort of non-existent victory. Goodnight.
Click to expand...
Night. Don’t let the Scottish bed bugs bite, they’re probably leading to your brain damage. And no the only reason I’m even commenting on this thread is because of you. If you never replied to me I wouldn’t have said anything. I actually came here to look at another thread but got sidetracked. Thanks for the chuckles pal, good riddance.
 
train GIF
 
Samanhelm said:
Night. Don’t let the Scottish bed bugs bite, they’re probably leading to your brain damage. And no the only reason I’m even commenting on this thread is because of you. If you never replied to me I wouldn’t have said anything. I actually came here to look at another thread but got sidetracked. Thanks for the chuckles pal, good riddance.
Click to expand...
Why do I always find you fighting and provoking people on these forums?
 
emileh said:
No, they're not relevant to the focus of the debate. They're a classic example of a straw man argument. Your responses are all over the place and using a straw man is desperate stuff. Focus please.
Click to expand...
I see you like
having a little drama in your life
I get it, it's entertaining, keep it up!​
 
honestly doubt swearing will come back; there is a slight chance but all in all only the cm will decide apon its fate lol☕
 
I heard 'sh!t' got censored on kc ave. Tbh that one should be allowed, as it's not really that bad. Maybe there was abuse around the word that the site owner found in kc ave? Unsure as I don't go there.

I do not, however, support the f-word in coming back though because the only reason it was ever there and allowed in the first place was because of former admin fumetsu/unknownwarrior suggesting it to the owner, and he agreed. But, would not agree with any other kc admin about it. So, the f-word was never meant to be allowed in kc ave unfortunately..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top