Female UM?

[Louize]

I made a point in another thread that sometimes, people prefer speaking to a particular gender in regards to issues.

Could we consider getting a female UM for this reason?

A woman reporting sexual harassment might not want to deal with a male, for example. On the other foot, a male might not want to speak to a female... or maybe he does want to speak to a female over more sensitive issues that wouldn't be deemed masculine or something. It could also help to have someone see something from another viewpoint.

Not disregarding current UMs (Well, not the majority of them) being approachable or anything. Just think it might be a nice idea to have both a female and a male in a UM position for moments where this might be the case?

Thoughts?

 

[rapinoes smirking revenge]

only of she's really hot






fine i'll accept the position

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

The very question is discriminatory since its based specifically on gender. For that reason only I say no.

 

[-Luka]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Actually it promotes equality.

 

[Louize]

.... You really are a twit.

I suggest a balance of both genders, and you go full misogynist. Prove my point some more, baby. Please. I like you humiliated.

 

[StubleU]

The very question is discriminatory since its based on specifically on gender. For that reason only I say no.

so you agree that non-binary or any other gender identity not only exists, is valid, but also should be a UM? wait till shortdickman sees this

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

so you agree that non-binary or any other gender identity not only exists, is valid, but also should be a UM? wait till shortdickman sees this

Good point- of course they exist. Another reason why this poll is discriminatory as it defacto excludes all other genders. Im actually shocked its me that has to point that out.

edit: added "poll"

 

[Louize]

Don't let him derail this thread so it gets looked at like a laughing stock. I genuinely feel like a balance of male and female UMs would work well for the site.

 

[StubleU]

Good point- of course they exist. Another reason why this is discriminatory as it defacto excludes all other genders. Im actually shocked its me that has to point that out.

saved to wayback machine...but regardless...stop trying to grasp on to random false flags to avoid getting fired or called out for being absolutely useless in life

 

[Louize]

@Apollo can you please remove him from the thread due to disrupting it with his misogyny and turning it into a debate? or move the irrelevant posts he's already making to an EE thread as he would do if it was someone doing it in a Princessa thread?

 

[Soapie]

...its hardly discriminatory lol. Its not saying any other is worse or better than another, just would be nice for a bit of variety.

And of course, if someone wishes to do it, and gets permission, there should be no reason as to why they shouldn't. Just... wether there is someone who wants it or not is around is the question (someone with an actual chance lol)

 

[-Luka]

I vote for a trans UM if it means replacing HR indefinitely.

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

...its hardly discriminatory lol. Its not saying any other is worse or better than another, just would be nice for a bit of variety.

And of course, if someone wishes to do it, and gets permission, there should be no reason as to why they shouldn't. Just... wether there is someone who wants it or not is around is the question (someone with an actual chance lol)

its specifically promoting one gender (only) and excluding at the expense of all others, thats the very definition of discrimination .

 

[-Luka]

Ok @Louize just add an equality act exemption from your post. That’ll make it more definitive. No links tho 🤪🤏

 

[Louize]

I made a point in another thread that sometimes, people prefer speaking to a particular gender in regards to issues.

Could we consider getting a female UM for this reason?

A woman reporting sexual harassment might not want to deal with a male, for example. On the other foot, a male might not want to speak to a female... or maybe he does want to speak to a female over more sensitive issues that wouldn't be deemed masculine or something. It could also help to have someone see something from another viewpoint.

Not disregarding current UMs (Well, not the majority of them) being approachable or anything. Just think it might be a nice idea to have both a female and a male in a UM position for moments where this might be the case?

Thoughts?

Sorry, promoting only one gender? Are you blind as well as dumb?

 

[-Luka]

its specifically promoting one gender (only) at the expense of all others, thats the very definition of discrimination .

She’s not gonna promote men …. When currently all UMs are …. male.

calm your tits Alzheimer’s

 

[Soapie]

its specifically promoting one gender (only) and excluding at the expense of all others, thats the very definition of discrimination .

If you are meaning the whole "some people may be more comfortable with a female um to talk to".... maybe. But its still not devaluing anyone else of opposite gender, just that having options would maybe help some people to speak out more

 

[Louize]

I also say that some men might not be comfortable talking to a male.

He's clutching.

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

If you are meaning the whole "some people may be more comfortable with a female um to talk to".... maybe. But its still not devaluing anyone else of opposite gender, just that having options would maybe help some people to speak out more

yes im not saying the OP intent isnt sincere (cough) but this:

"I made a point in another thread that sometimes, people prefer speaking to a particular gender"

 

[StubleU]

"I made a point in another thread that sometimes, people prefer speaking to a particular gender"

most of the time no one wants to speak with you...and that has nothing to do with your gender or your misogynic nature