For or Against Marijuana

I am not anti weed (althoiugh i am against young people smoking heavily ) but you have to be real and non biased when lookin at the facts ....
your 4th fact is incorrect it can damage your mental health, causing memory loss, increased paranoia, insomnia and in some rare cases cannabis induced psychosis

 
I believe it should be legal as I believe in the right of freedom of choice when it comes to drugs etc. I have a few weed smoker friends and they all choose it as their lifestyle and are very happy for it. They are extremely nice, relaxed and fun people, more than can be said for alcoholics.

I smoke occasionally but not nearly as much as I used to as I prefer to take it in moderation. These people know the consequences and if it makes them happy who am I to tell them not to? Anyway that's my view of it. I believe it should be legal and also there would be less organised crime if drugs were legal and were controlled by companies, and taxed etc. 😛
 
I believe it should be legal as I believe in the right of freedom of choice when it comes to drugs etc. I have a few weed smoker friends and they all choose it as their lifestyle and are very happy for it. They are extremely nice, relaxed and fun people, more than can be said for alcoholics.

I smoke occasionally but not nearly as much as I used to as I prefer to take it in moderation. These people know the consequences and if it makes them happy who am I to tell them not to? Anyway that's my view of it. I believe it should be legal and also there would be less organised crime if drugs were legal and were controlled by companies, and taxed etc. 😛

So.. In that sense, you're for the legalization of any drug known to man, right?

I believe it should be legal and also there would be less organised crime if drugs were legal and were controlled by companies, and taxed etc.

Not necessarily. As I've said before, people will still seek out the black market for a lesser price and most likely better quality weed than what the companies will offer you.
 
Last edited:
Yes, in my opinion drugs should be legal. I think by legalising drugs you can address the real problems. Most illegal drug use is recreational anyway. With those who are suffering with real problems, whether its illegal or not they are going to get a hold of it. At least if it was legal there would be more help out there for addicts and people wouldn't look down on them so much in society.

There is so much bad information out there about drugs too, this would pave the way for teaching on it in schools etc. So people get a better view of what their doing. Its safer.

Another fact is that people are going to use drugs anyway. Most people have tried them and most people will try at least one form of drug in their lifetime.

Also I think if it was legal most people would just use companies rather than go down the criminal route. There is also so much violence and crime as a result of illegal drug dealing, also the people paying taxes for those who go to jail for using and dealing drugs. That would save billions in terms of the prison systems as if drugs were legal there would be less crime over it.

I'm not saying legalising drugs would solve all the problems but I think there is so many benefits from it than having them legal. Prohibiting them has been proven that its just not working. It causes so, so many problems in society. That being said, you'll probably think I am a drug user but apart from Marijuana now and again, I am not. :lol: I think people should have the free choice too.
 
Medical Marijuana has the support of the APA (American Psychological Association). https://www.salem-news.com/articles/november072007/med_psyc_11707.php

The news was a long time ago. The thing with science and the community, is that scientists are always looking for new studies. Marijuana has been studied to the point of overkill. It's not a scientist's job to tell the public eye again what's good or bad, when they're busy with new discoveries and studies.

I can say for fact that marijuana is still less toxic compared to the cigarettes and cigars that are out in the market. Cigars and cigarettes use carcinogenic chemicals, many of which are aromatics where free particles increase damage to DNA. In fact, there is change that is already happening to increase the legalization of marijuana in some states (16 at this moment) for medical usage.

Is marijuana physically damaging? Yes, it is absolutely if inhaled via smoking. Smoking anything can damage the lungs just by CO2 concentration, but marijuana is relatively safe if inhaled through a vaporizer (cannot be said the same for cigarettes). There are also many things that happen once THC (active chemical) binds to the cannabinoid receptors, I cannot say for certain if it's fully negative or fully positive for that reason. To make the argument that it is mentally damaging though, is no different than saying alcohol is bad for the brain, so that is not a good argument.

There is a deep politics issue and the affect legalization can have on the states. Change happens in small steps at a time for a reason and if anything, there is a huge smoking ban movement that is going on. So for that reason, there is also something called the "pot pill" where THC is put into the system by digestion for medical usage.
 
Last edited:
Yes, in my opinion drugs should be legal. I think by legalising drugs you can address the real problems. Most illegal drug use is recreational anyway. With those who are suffering with real problems, whether its illegal or not they are going to get a hold of it. At least if it was legal there would be more help out there for addicts and people wouldn't look down on them so much in society.

There is so much bad information out there about drugs too, this would pave the way for teaching on it in schools etc. So people get a better view of what their doing. Its safer.

Another fact is that people are going to use drugs anyway. Most people have tried them and most people will try at least one form of drug in their lifetime.

Also I think if it was legal most people would just use companies rather than go down the criminal route. There is also so much violence and crime as a result of illegal drug dealing, also the people paying taxes for those who go to jail for using and dealing drugs. That would save billions in terms of the prison systems as if drugs were legal there would be less crime over it.

I'm not saying legalising drugs would solve all the problems but I think there is so many benefits from it than having them legal. Prohibiting them has been proven that its just not working. It causes so, so many problems in society. That being said, you'll probably think I am a drug user but apart from Marijuana now and again, I am not. :lol: I think people should have the free choice too.

I think you bring up some interesting points. However, I also think that you try to ignore how really, really flawed the legalizing drugs movement is... Let's say if we would to legalize drugs, wouldn't it be more accessible to the public? My point is that certain drugs causes violent behavior, and if it would to be so easily obtainable, it would become a big problem. You could argue that there wouldn't be so many people using drugs when it's legal, but take a look at Alcohol & Cigarettes, and heck, even abortion. Young people starts at a very early age with smoking and drinking alcohol because it's 'cool'. Imagine them snorting their fathers cocaine. When something becomes legal, the usage doesn't decrease, it increases. When something becomes illegal, it deters people from using it. Sure, there will be people who still does it/uses it, but nevertheless, it is a determent.

Yeah, prohibiting means that there will be a black market for it which also means that organized crime will build up. Why does that mean that we should simply give up? I think we should work hard on it instead - re-focus our efforts to stop the black market & organized crime. With today's uprising technology and heavily militarized Police Force, I don't see why that's so bloody difficult to achieve...

Now for the "free choice" argument.. We've never had the right to do whatever we want with our bodies and for a good reason. We have rules so that there can be order in our society. Honestly, the way I see it, if we would to legalize all drugs known to man, we might just say bye bye to our civilization as we know it.

As for the companies selling marijuana... Why would anyone buy them from the greedy companies? I recon a bag of marijuana would cost about, what? 5 times more than you'd pay on the street for the same amount? It wouldn't be a good deal... Not to mention the limits the Government will no doubt put in.
---
Conclusion; Yes, the legalization of drugs might solve some current issues we're having now, but let's not forget the aftermath: Everyone will be able to get their hands on drugs easily (again, look at alcohol and cigarettes), and most of them will be able to use them legally. We'll become an impaired civilization; slowly dooming itself by creating its own destruction... Alright, maybe that's a bit far fetched. But more druggies, increased homeless and an increased death toll sounds pretty destructive to me.

People who claims that legalizing drugs will only become beneficial for our society are a bunch of morons...
 
Last edited:
The "discussion" is about marijuana - not drugs. Marijuana isn't a drug. Drugs are manufactured. Alcohol is a drug.

Marijuana is a plant that contains a certain amount of substance(s) that alters your psychological ability if inhaled. Thus it's labeled as a drug, or more technically speaking, a psychoactive drug.

Yes, it's a drug. dumbass
 
I'm agreeing with Anders on most of this.
Personally, I don't think marijuana should be legalized nor should other drugs.
I've never smoked it,
(Or done any other drug for that matter.)
Nor do I intend to so maybe I'm a bit biased.

And for those who think marijuana is not a drug:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_(drug)
Yes it is.

No. You're absolutely right, believe it or not. Drugs are frowned upon by society for a very good reason and this is the internet where all the low-life degenerates meet up and try to defend their cause. Those who claim that marijuana isn't a drug are simple potheads that tries to justify their use. Nothing more.
 
Last edited:
I am not anti weed (althoiugh i am against young people smoking heavily ) but you have to be real and non biased when lookin at the facts ....
your 4th fact is incorrect it can damage your mental health, causing memory loss, increased paranoia, insomnia and in some rare cases cannabis induced psychosis


Marijuana is a plant that contains a certain amount of substance(s) that alters your psychological ability if inhaled. Thus it's labeled as a drug, or more technically speaking, a psychoactive drug.

Yes, it's a drug. dumbass

I'm agreeing with Anders on most of this.
Personally, I don't think marijuana should be legalized nor should other drugs.
I've never smoked it,
(Or done any other drug for that matter.)
Nor do I intend to so maybe I'm a bit biased.

And for those who think marijuana is not a drug:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_(drug)
Yes it is.

No. You're absolutely right, believe it or not. Drugs are frowned upon by society for a very good reason and this is the internet where all the low-life degenerates meet up and try to defend their cause.

that incl urself andass

obviously smokin weed will have different effects on diff people . i have been smokin weed on n off for some yrs now
when u abuse of somethin , anythin really especially cheap stuff , of course it's gonna do u wrong yall know that
personally i dont wonda what my life wud b like if i didnt smoke mariejeanne . i've reached where i wanted 2 b @ my age long months ago
most of yall hatin on mariejeanne have neva even tried it . shame on yall
 
that incl urself andass

obviously smokin weed will have different effects on diff people . i have been smokin weed on n off for some yrs now
when u abuse of somethin , anythin really especially cheap stuff , of course it's gonna do u wrong yall know that
personally i dont wonda what my life wud b like if i didnt smoke mariejeanne . i've reached where i wanted 2 b @ my age long months ago
most of yall hatin on mariejeanne have neva even tried it . shame on yall
I can't even comment on this because I know it'll get deleted.
:hmm:
I'll leave that up to Anders.
:lol:
 
Personally, I don't think marijuana should be legalized nor should other drugs.

I hate to play semantics, but most forms of treatment/medicine are considered drugs as well. There are plenty of legalized drugs, that when injected into the body, help the body to fight off diseases (flu vaccine). Although it's obvious we're talking about legalizing an illegal drug with is a negative here, I just wanted to make sure we all don't misuse that claim for all drugs.

You'll find that some forms of treatment/drugs can have negatives and positives (symptons include: diarrhea, vomiting, headache, etc. If you see hallucinations, contact your doctor immediately). Especially the current psychoactive drugs used on patients to treat schizophrenia and mental illnesses of the brain, some of those drugs are not fully understood, but they're legal because the benefits outweigh the cost. Those drugs are not easily available on the streets like marijuana because creating such a pill would require quite the knowledge of chemistry (and money). Similar to those drugs, marijuana seems to have both positive and negative affects.

Marijuana is one of those topics that are covered in psychology courses and biopsychology courses that I (sadly) had to study. Legalization for medical use is pretty much considered okay from the APA after years of research, so I'm guessing until their opinion changes or a new discovery happens, I'll stick to that more so.

Anders does prove a point that it is more expensive than the street marijuana. One of the reasons is that, it's a market (anything with medicine attached to it is expensive it seems), the second reason is so that users for medical reasons don't re-sell them out in the streets. If they bought it at a much higher price, why should druggies buy back from them at that price? Druggies wants it cheap, but those who bought it for medical usage spend even more money, they won't be able to profit at all. It's a ploy to separate those that actually need it for medical use, from the people that abuse the substance. Even while legalized, only a person that has a "marijuana card," which signifies they have the "okay" from professional diagnosis of a doctor, can have medical marijuana in the first place. It's still illegal for anybody else and I doubt the government would give the "okay" to rule breakers easily.

Given the current conditions, would you deny medical marijuana for those that want to use it as medicine? The patients don't have much to gain at all and it's really their choice to use it or not. I'm not a smoker of marijuana or any form of smoking, but these arguments seem to uphold where I'm at, where marijuana is legalized for patients.
 
Last edited:
I hate to play semantics, but most forms of treatment/medicine are considered drugs as well. There are plenty of legalized drugs, that when injected into the body, help the body to fight off diseases (flu vaccine). Although it's obvious we're talking about legalizing an illegal drug with is a negative here, I just wanted to make sure we all don't misuse that claim for all drugs.

You'll find that some forms of treatment/drugs can have negatives and positives (symptons include: diarrhea, vomiting, headache, etc. If you see hallucinations, contact your doctor immediately). Especially the current psychoactive drugs used on patients to treat schizophrenia and mental illnesses of the brain, some of those drugs are not fully understood, but they're legal because the benefits outweigh the cost. Those drugs are not easily available on the streets like marijuana because creating such a pill would require quite the knowledge of chemistry (and money). Similar to those drugs, marijuana seems to have both positive and negative affects.

Marijuana is one of those topics that are covered in psychology courses and biopsychology courses that I (sadly) had to study. Legalization for medical use is pretty much considered okay from the APA after years of research, so I'm guessing until their opinion changes or a new discovery happens, I'll stick to that more so.

Anders does prove a point that it is more expensive than the street marijuana. One of the reasons is that, it's a market (anything with medicine attached to it is expensive it seems), the second reason is so that users for medical reasons don't re-sell them out in the streets. If they bought it at a much higher price, why should druggies buy back from them at that price? Druggy wants it cheap, the person that got it from the hospital wants to profit and sells higher. It's a ploy to separate those that actually need it for medical use, from the people that abuse the substance. Even while legalized, only a person that has a "marijuana card," which signifies they have the "okay" from professional diagnosis of a doctor, can have medical marijuana in the first place. It's still pretty much illegal for anybody else and I doubt the government would give the "okay" to rule breakers easily. But who knows, if I recall correctly from history, alcohol was something that the government of the US tried to make illegal.

But given the current conditions, would you deny medical marijuana for those that want to use it as medicine? They have nothing to gain at all.
You know what I meant when I said drugs.
Medical marijuana is legal when you get it legally and with a legitimate medical reason, so I'm not denying them anything?

There will always be different opinions and problems about this subject and all other subjects
 
Last edited:
Medical marijuana is legal when you get it legally and with a legitimate medical reason, so I'm not denying them anything?

That's actually not true for thirty-six different states in the US where medical marijuana is not offered at all (same with Europe, there are some places that are still wondering if medical marijuana is okay). No hospitals in those places would offer it because it is illegal to have it. The illegal status of marijuana used to be so strict, that even Ph.D psychologists initially had trouble to research the chemical because the government refused to allow scientists to test them. Even today, that is still true, not all psychologists are allowed to do research with the substance. The initial question was whether we are for or against it, so I just wanted to throw in government regulated medical marijuana and see what the opinion is for that.

Edit: I apologize for not noticing a thread on medical marijuana. I just clicked from the front page. Also, edited the number to thirty-six, it's roughly around there.
 
Last edited:
That's actually not true for forty-four different states in the US where medical marijuana is not offered at all (same with Europe, there are some places that are still wondering if medical marijuana is okay). No hospitals in those places would offer it because it is illegal to have it. The illegal status of marijuana used to be so strict, that even Ph.D psychologists initially had trouble to research the chemical because the government refused to allow scientists to test them. Even today, that is still true, not all psychologists are allowed to do research with the substance. The initial question was whether we are for or against it, so I just wanted to throw in government regulated medical marijuana and see what the opinion is for that.

Edit: I apologize for not noticing a thread on medical marijuana. I just clicked from the front page. <.<
I get what you mean.
:lol:
I was just throwing my opinion in.
I'm not exactly savvy to all of the 'drug' related laws.
😛
 
Of course... Everything 'bad' about weed should be labeled "all lies" because that's the way it is, huh? 🙂

Anyway, back to realism. I'm not going to say that marijuana is the worst drug out there, but it has been proven to cause depression, and really **** up your brain if you're unlucky. The fact that junkies like yourself keeps 'denying' all the scientific studies that have been made that are against the use of marijuana is not going to change anything. If you want to label it "all lies", then DEBUNK it. Preferably by using scientific measures, and not the old "It's all a Government conspiracy" clich?.

How Can You Say Marijuana Is The Worst Drug Out There?
And If It Really Were Causing Problems, Why is There Cannibus Clubs Today?
 
Top