GC Suggestion

Usernames with mom, dad, mum, daughter, brother etc should not be allowed. Same goes for church. 95% of those with that in the user name are pedophiles and perverts. Want proof go into GC let alone any of the chat rooms and you’ll see.
 
BroAndSis isnt because of the family name, but because we only allow one user per name. So a couples thing isnt an option. I cant really add more to what @Amaisey already stated.

As far as the OP goes, being a mom doesnt make you a criminal. Being a dad doesnt make you a criminal. Being so quick to label is not a good way to look at life. Have proof? Send it directly to me as we are in the room a lot together. If that isnt good enough, send it directly to Amaisey in PMs.
If a couples thing isn’t an option then you’re failing at your job as clearly this SS shows a couple in there rn

Couple username
 
In the mod section of this forum (which only mods can see) is a tremendously helpful topic about code words. It was extremely helpful to me when I was allowed to mod Les chat. I'm pretty sure the mods from Girls are familiar with it, or maybe not, I don't really know. But it should be required reading for all mods, regardless of the rooms for which they are responsible. Whoever would have thought that Cheese Pizza would be a code word for the exploitation of children. I often see guests with some form of "Knotty" in their username. Not everyone knows that term is associated with beastiality, since I see that rather frequently in Girls and Les chat. I often report it, but my report goes ignored.
 
Oh wow.
Over 9 years ago Girls Chat had a policy of no familial names, all were kicked.
CM actually came into the room and demodded a mod for kicking a familial name.
The only one then to be removed was Daddy as a special concession.
I guess as a safeguarding issue with young Girls!

There has been numerous discussions since then but CM's view is familial titles in names are allowed in most rooms.

A more salient point is removing pictures of parents with kids, or just kids!

Something to think about.

flame
 
Nooo, don’t reveal that the mods have a code word dictionary lol the creeps will change their words lol
 
I remember this being a hotbed topic years ago. Years ago "family" names were discouraged in chat with chat rooms having individual policies as to how to deal with this. During my short tenure as admin the Chatmaster who I believe they called Dan at the time, maybe @purplerose can clarify. The CM made a big stink about mods booting family related names. It was a big topic in mod forums. If I recall, the new edict said that mods could not boot just for family names but could if the chat named referenced one of the big no nos.
 
I remember this being a hotbed topic years ago. Years ago "family" names were discouraged in chat with chat rooms having individual policies as to how to deal with this. During my short tenure as admin the Chatmaster who I believe they called Dan at the time, maybe @purplerose can clarify. The CM made a big stink about mods booting family related names. It was a big topic in mod forums. If I recall, the new edict said that mods could not boot just for family names but could if the chat named referenced one of the big no nos.
directly from my mod rules. so at one point they were changed to allow innocent names.
4. things to warn & mute for
NOTE: mom/dad names are allowed as long as they are innocent names. IE: dadof4; soccermom. mom/dad names that are overtly sexual need to be removed. IE wanting a sugar dadi or dadlooking4 sitter
 
What a pathetic response from @Amaisey and @SimplyKarina y’all see this crap daily. And by taking no action y’all are guilty of protecting the creeps.
This is NOT an Amaisey or a SimplyKarina issue

This is a Chatmaster issue, so I would suggest you try to contact him and maintain radio silence to keep the lines open for a reply from CM.

The site owner, CM, sets the rules which all Admin and Mods are to follow or they will be fired without warning for trivial and unjustified reasons.
 
It appears chat-avenue is now owned by an Indian company with revenue less than 5 million USD. From what I can find, it was sold by Americans in perhaps the last 2 years. One source put the revenue between 11 and 15 million.... but perhaps that is what it was sold for. I'm not sure how reliable my cited source is, but it appears to be legit. Here: https://www.zoominfo.com/c/chat-avenue/354041929. Perhaps this explains some of the changes and site owner's philosophy.
 
Top