Here is an idea to get ride bot

That might be a good idea to downgrade the sheer amount of spammers that the sites get but you mustn’t forget that it also has major downsides for the regular users and/or anybody who is a genuine person that wants to login into the chat.

They will see the login system that requires them to put it in a code every single time be like “ that is too much “, nobody wants to grab a code every time they want to log into the chats and that will be a big issue as user counts will start to drop. [ Real people, not bot counts. ]

Not to mention that many users [ which I have seen many times ] use fake emails to make an account hence not everyone trusts the internet to use their emails and such.
 
Elysian✨ said:
That might be a good idea to downgrade the sheer amount of spammers that the sites get but you mustn’t forget that it also has major downsides for the regular users and/or anybody who is a genuine person that wants to login into the chat.

They will see the login system that requires them to put it in a code every single time be like “ that is too much “, nobody wants to grab a code every time they want to log into the chats and that will be a big issue as user counts will start to drop. [ Real people, not bot counts. ]

Not to mention that many users [ which I have seen many times ] use fake emails to make an account hence not everyone trusts the internet to use their emails and such.
Click to expand...
If this website and users does not bot this is the only option they got.
 
you dont get it do you because your never going to get rid of all the bots its like spam calls on your cell phone you bann one another pops in and when they made a program to not let bots in they them selves made a program that got them around yet another program thatwas put in place to keep them out so as you see you make one thing to keep them out they make one thing to block what you made
 
altazz3 said:
you dont get it do you because your never going to get rid of all the bots its like spam calls on your cell phone you bann one another pops in and when they made a program to not let bots in they them selves made a program that got them around yet another program thatwas put in place to keep them out so as you see you make one thing to keep them out they make one thing to block what you made
Click to expand...
You are one don't get it. I guess you are a scammer consider you don't configure your account.
 
When you log in why don't send a code to their phone or email like they do chat forum because the bot can't access to their phone or email.
 
I am not sure this is posted in the right section.

To me it seems they are suggesting Two-factor authentication (2FA) for chat and forums. As bots will not enter that information to log in by checking their phone or email.
 
Looks like the forum post came through as “ERROR,” so I’m missing the actual question. If it’s about anti-detect browsers, standard fingerprints aren’t enough since they can spoof profiles and make one machine look like many users. I’d combine browser, device, network, behavior, and account-linking signals, then review the higher-risk cases instead of blocking everyone automatically.

I’ve seen legitimate QA and privacy testing trigger similar flags, so a risk score with an explanation is more useful than a simple yes/no result. [NO LINKS]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yall are out of ya’ rootin’ tootin’ minds if u think any sensible person is gonna want to give this shady website more of their personal information 🤧
 
babydolla said:
a smart person uses an encrypted burner email, which is precisely what i did; & before u say anything about my vip status, i didnt buy it myself 🤷🏼‍♀️
Click to expand...
I actually did the same. Burner email and I bought vip with a prepaid visa. But most people don't
 
nickyp2015 said:
Looks like the forum post came through as “ERROR,” so I’m missing the actual question. If it’s about anti-detect browsers, standard fingerprints aren’t enough since they can spoof profiles and make one machine look like many users. I’d combine browser, device, network, behavior, and account-linking signals, then review the higher-risk cases instead of blocking everyone automatically.

I’ve seen legitimate QA and privacy testing trigger similar flags, so a risk score with an explanation is more useful than a simple yes/no result. [NO LINKS]
Click to expand...
Huh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top