Inkandtatts’ Inner Thoughts (Random Comments #715)

emileh said:
Deflecting much and hypocritical much? You've committed some pretty personal attacks on people here. I don't care about the real predators, you can crack on and attack them as much as you want. They are fair game. I think you need to get back to how you used to be because you weren't always this vitriolic often without real cause.
Click to expand...
This I’m more curious about. Not deflecting at all; as you know I’m wholly accountable for my actions and often agree with the repercussions I get. Unless, you know, when there’s actual proof of contradiction/favouritism et al. I am quite aware of the consequences- which the UM’s will agree. That wasn’t a deflection either.

Hypocritical- this I kinda get. But I don’t call people phobic for different opinions. I have said personal attacks yes… when they are facts. The floorshitter is the prime example.
I have also said personal attacks to rile/troll/reciprocate absolutely I admit- they are never for no reason. And when I have been wrong I have always apologised. So I hope that is satisfactory to your deflection comment, because I’ll deflect it with a fact.

I don’t go for innocent people.

Edit: proof* not gays lol
 
-Luka said:
This I’m more curious about. Not deflecting at all; as you know I’m wholly accountable for my actions and often agree with the repercussions I get. Unless, you know, when there’s actual gays of contradiction/favouritism et al. I am quite aware of the consequences- which the UM’s will agree. That wasn’t a deflection either.

Hypocritical- this I kinda get. But I don’t call people phobic for different opinions. I have said personal attacks yes… when they are facts. The floorshitter is the prime example.
I have also said personal attacks to rile/troll/reciprocate absolutely I admit- they are never for no reason. And when I have been wrong I have always apologised. So I hope that is satisfactory to your deflection comment, because I’ll deflect it with a fact.

I don’t go for innocent people.
Click to expand...
lol the "pensioner" comment hilarious.

@emileh - it's not a good look is all, @-Luka has always been known to share in-depth opinions, observations..

Case in da point:

ITS NOTTA good look generally.

@ArChAnGeL explain yaself. Mhmmm.
 
There was no accusation even when Blether asked I responded accordingly. Factual.

Nothing hypocritical either about calling things out; especially when I got called out for calling out on a false pretense because I based mine on facts proven and called out the hypocrisy.
 
-Luka said:
There was no accusation even when Blether asked I responded accordingly. Factual.

Nothing hypocritical either about calling things out; especially when I got called out for calling out on a false pretense because I based mine on facts proven and called out the hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
lol so if he unfollowed it'll keep everyone happy? Or make.
 
Well when you tell someone they were banned for saying they were 17, and a mod said they were for evading a ban, and the user said they weren’t 17, and the thread got closed when challenged- without the user being able to prove, what does that tell you?

Again, of course I may be wrong. It’s called seeing the bigger picture and to be chastised for it is wild 😂
 
-Luka said:
Well when you tell someone they were banned for saying they were 17, and a mod said they were for evading a ban, and the user said they weren’t 17, and the thread got closed when challenged- without the user being able to prove, what does that tell you?

Again, of course I may be wrong. It’s called seeing the bigger picture and to be chastised for it is wild 😂
Click to expand...
lol you know the Scottish, they're passionate people, they LOVE to chastise.

His a pensioner have pity.
 
Blether said:
lol you know the Scottish, they're passionate people, they LOVE to chastise.

His a pensioner have pity.
Click to expand...
Yes because pensioners are the epitome of innocent. Especially retired NHS employees.

Oh that’s an opinion, not an accusation btw.

Hello, HR? Remember that pensioner?
 
-Luka said:
Yes because pensioners are the epitome of innocent. Especially retired NHS employees.

Oh that’s an opinion, not an accusation btw.

Hello, HR? Remember that pensioner?
Click to expand...
lol hilarious

I gotta admit I just wanna go on the opposite with Emileh lol just for the sake of it - it's funny - but with 20/20 vision, lol there's nothing new about your manners or your open observations
 
-Luka said:
Well when you tell someone they were banned for saying they were 17, and a mod said they were for evading a ban, and the user said they weren’t 17, and the thread got closed when challenged- without the user being able to prove, what does that tell you?

Again, of course I may be wrong. It’s called seeing the bigger picture and to be chastised for it is wild 😂
Click to expand...
Have you even considered that the evasion was of the ban for saying they were 17?
 
Blether said:
lol the "pensioner" comment hilarious.

@emileh - it's not a good look is all, @-Luka has always been known to share in-depth opinions, observations..

Case in da point:

ITS NOTTA good look generally.

@ArChAnGeL explain yaself. Mhmmm.
Click to expand...

In the past I'd have agreed with that. I've never had a problem with Luka until this. I've certainly told him to give his head a wobble a few times but then he was on a particularly over the top rant wielding a hugely broad brush at the time.

If you tar someone with the description of predator, which Luka did, then that's an accusation and a pretty serious one at that.. One that needs to be backed up with solid proof, not because one member followed another's posts on forums. If I've called this wrong then I'll be the first to apologise to Luka but so far there's been no actual proof of any predator-like actions. You don't tar someone with something like that just because you obviously don't like them.

I suggest you read back over the ban appeal threads before you jump in with any kind of judgement here.
 
emileh said:
In the past I'd have agreed with that. I've never had a problem with Luka until this. I've certainly told him to give his head a wobble a few times but then he was on a particularly over the top rant wielding a hugely broad brush at the time.

If you tar someone with the description of predator, which Luka did, then that's an accusation and a pretty serious one at that.. One that needs to be backed up with solid proof, not because one member followed another's posts on forums. If I've called this wrong then I'll be the first to apologise to Luka but so far there's been no actual proof of any predator-like actions. You don't tar someone with something like that just because you obviously don't like them.

I suggest you read back over the ban appeal threads before you jump in with any kind of judgement here.
Click to expand...

Monkey What GIF


Lets Go Goodbye GIF by Teletubbies



Regards
Greta.
 
-Luka said:
Yes. The thread was closed before said user could prove. He said he wasn’t. When admin was called out thread was closed.
Click to expand...
A banned user denying doing anything wrong and then evading the original ban? Jings! Heaven forfend! You were staff once so you know how all of this works...
 
Try setting aside your obvious dislike of the admin and look at it from a different angle. Honestly @-Luka, you're so much better than this.
 
Kim said:
Better off DMing CM at this point.

@purplerose , help a girl out here. Did i dream this or could we back in the day after merging/moving posts etc leave a redirect symbol?????
Click to expand...
the answer is yes. earlier versions we had to check mark the box ( we were also told to do so by pink lady ) regardless of spam/unmentionable forums landing it was required. later versions it was automatic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kim
It’s absolutely fukin freezing. However, curry for dinner and I can almost taste the smell of it cooking and it’s not even on yet. 😭
 
“Why are you upset, mummy?”

Someone changed my profile picture to a duck.

Call the fucking media- woman is offended.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top