-Luka
Platinum Member
Hi,
To avoid confusion, when you have a post removed/edited etc like the example below, would a reason not be reasonable? It’s very vague and if one would like one to follow TOS rules, then one would think one would explain and/or signpost to said SPECIFIC rule.
Considering the TOS/Forum rules seem to change regularly at the said UM’s discretion to suit their narrative, it also leaves the audit trail so speak.
One thinks this is reasonable since this shít is becoming more frequent:
View attachment 983285
Disclaimer: no names mention, a suggestion and no reason to be closed by certain next Tuesdays.
To avoid confusion, when you have a post removed/edited etc like the example below, would a reason not be reasonable? It’s very vague and if one would like one to follow TOS rules, then one would think one would explain and/or signpost to said SPECIFIC rule.
Considering the TOS/Forum rules seem to change regularly at the said UM’s discretion to suit their narrative, it also leaves the audit trail so speak.
One thinks this is reasonable since this shít is becoming more frequent:
View attachment 983285
Disclaimer: no names mention, a suggestion and no reason to be closed by certain next Tuesdays.