More abuse

Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NavyEA-6B

Bronze Member
Well @leigh you gave me another week to find dirt. Thank you for that.

Now as to your action.
I have no idea who you were trained by, if at all. But I was trained and held to it, that mods being harassed is day to day business.

As a matter of fact I went a few rounds over it with my former Admin.

Consider telling your mods to stop taking it personal.
To message the person if they have little history, to please stop works really well!
Unless they are disrupting the room, why bother with it, you are giving the attention they crave.

And if all that fails, sure then kick them.
I can not even fathom the times of have been told what to do with parts of me, and yeap Admin had to take me to task because I kicked them for just that.

Kicking People always makes users want to join or upgrade.

Game On.
 
Hi again, @NavyEA-6B -

This has already been discussed multiple times - in public forums and via DMs - and you've already been directed to @Chatmaster if you have concerns regarding Admin or UM decisions.

You're entitled to disagree with moderation decisions. That was true when you were a moderator, and it's true now. However, disagreement does not exempt anyone (including you) from following the established rules. If you believe an Admin or UM decision is improper, the appropriate to contact is Chatmaster, not repeatedly creating new threads about the same issue after it has already been addressed and redirected.

At this point, the issue is no longer whether you agree with the decision. It's whether you're willing to respect the rules you've been directed to follow.

Creating additional threads on matters that have already been discussed, closed, and redirected does not change the outcome. It simply rehashes the same discussion and creates unnecessary disruption, which causes the bans that you keep returning upset over. Repeating a previously-made point in a new thread does not make it a new point.

And while I can appreciate persistence, the forum is not a "best two out of three" system for revisiting closed topics.

Going forward, please refrain from creating new threads regarding issues that have already been reviewed and redirected. If you wish to pursue the matter further, you know where to do so: @Chatmaster.

Also, “Game Off”.
It ended before it could even start.
Try tagging the right person next time.

Have the day you deserve. 🙂
 
And what rule makes you the person that decides when a topic is finished.
You can keep banning me.
Sooner or later someone above you will get tired of you treating users like this.

I am going the the DSM-5 Definition, Inferiority Complex.
 
The Fact that in Gen Chat, 13 year olds are allowed to talk with adults over 18.

No matter how innocent it sounds, it means they can go into DM or off the site and the Site helped them connect.

Look at the post office wall sometime, or on some milk cartons. Want to bet many of the missing were chatting online first?
 
Eddie Murphy What GIF by Laff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top