Cherries in the snow
Active Member
I've answered all of those points actually.
I've answered that too. If they DO get thrown out, it will be because of the fact that they are pregnant...not necessarily because they gt expelled.
😵 So we should all go get laid? Seriously...
Umm...I didn't say they ARE adults. I said they should be TREATED like adults. There's a difference.
It might not be her fault, but then again, we have to keep in mind that rape isn't the main cause of teen pregnancies. Therefore, you can't really use that to support your arguement if 9/10 pregnancies aren't rape-related, but rather choice-related.
So the government can provide the pregnant teens with free edu. as well. 😵 I mean, at the end, the cost would still be the same.
Let me give you an example.
You have this extremely popular girl who has parties every weekend where they get laid. One day, she falls pregnant at one of her parties. She has her baby and comes back to school. And what do you know? Because she's so popular, she has somehow made this ordeal into something glamourous. So the next time she has her party, lots of other girls go...they get pressured into having ***, they fall pregnant.
That was an example hun. you cannot deny the fact that in certain schools, the environment aren't exactly safe.
The times have changed.
IT's not your job to say what the government's job is. 😱k:
I wasn't using r.ape to support my argument. You said date r.ape is partially the girls fault, I said it is not. A guy who commits date r.ape has no one to blame but himself.
No, if the government provides a seperate education outside of the already existing public school system, the cost would not be the same. The additional systems expense would be added on the already existing cost.
Thanks for the example but most girls do not associate pregnancy with a glamorous life. Here's my example. My friends and I always realized being a pregnant teenager while still in school is a huge burden and never wished it for ourselves. It's common sense.
It is the peoples job to determine what the government controls. That's what a government of the people, by the people and for the people is supposed to mean.