VIP Plus / Gold ( straight up comment )

OriginalScreenName

OriginalScreenName

Silver Member
yeah, so, wooo a big half off sale of VIP Plus, only $50.00!!!!!!

Regular Price, $100.00.

Who the F was smoking when setting the price for this ? I mean congrats on finally listening to users who wanted the option as a VIP to be able to mute guests, real friggin cute making that option only for VIP+ members at $100.00.

This chat site,{ with the amount of spam, criminals , adults posing as children , the mentally disabled who think they are heroes spamming the room, the disgusting adults section , the video/cam section ( which use to have normal users before that got Fd and is now nothing but another room for puddy players to assemble ) } is Not worth $50-$100 for " VIP+" 20 bucks USD is easy to flush down the toilet because that is pretty much what anyone spends on a fast food drive through which is the only reason why regular VIP was " worth " buying.

I'd really be curious as to who the genius was that decided this was a good price point for the extra option to mute guests. And if it was a group of people who decided, if it was an AI program, or just one general knob who decided by themself.

along with the purchase option for " Gold " hilarious absolutely hilarious, i wouldn't spend anything on that gold, the idea of buying a websites " gold " was for actual online video games, aka Pay to play . at least when video game companies rip off customers, the customers get something from it to continue on or advance in a game.



What is annoying is to see who ever has the final decision on chat ave to make changes to the website like features or making new rooms or discontinuing rooms, etc; what i find a little annoying, is to see a tiny bit of effort made to make a change and barely barely in a positive way, i cant even consider the efforts made to even be worth called being half assed. I imagine an actual intern for the operations of this website could do a better half assed job, and job is a loose word for interns ( because for those of you who don't know, interns are basically volunteers that get to say they have had on the job training )..

Also, for the genius out there, what users were requesting with the ability to auto mute guests, we meant for that option to be added on to existing VIP accounts, not something to dangle over our heads with a brand new insane fee.

so far i only know of one person who purchased VIP Plus, and said it isnt worth it.
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
of course they locked autoblocking guests behind a pay wall, if they just let us block the guests as our accounts are now; then how else would they make up the loss in revenue from the blocked guests, that'll surely lose interest by being autoblocked???

the absolute state of decadence this website has achieved is honestly hilarious 👺

i didn't spend a dime on the vip i has now, nor the one i has in general chat, what makes them think i'm going to spend 50 - 100$ for this???

😂😂😂
 
Another 15 or 20 on top of what we already spent and make all new users pay full price would be fair. For all vip it means we've paid 65 to 70 to the site to get the new vip+ while new users just pay 50?

They should have just upped vip to 30 or 40 and gave all existing vip the new features.

Any guests on the fence would be forced to join the site. They'd make way more money off people gifting.

Honestly at this point I'll just wait for a couple more tiers to come out before upgrading.
 
Chat master is looking to make up for the lack of vip purchases. Hell get some losers who pay $50 for virtually nothing, but thats it. Meanwhile, he refuses to ban Kratos whose already on the ban list, because he purchased multiple VIPS. This is Sthcalguy all over again, except this guy spams his nano-d*ck. What a dumb f*ck.
 
Users asking the guest mute option for a very long while but they put that there. Fine. I'm pretty much surprised this place is still running we have so many social media where we can talk (safely) now they put on the greedy button. That's fine too.

But just asking if I buy gold for money and if I collect some can I change back? No ofc not but what if I want my money back because some normal VIPs advertised features got removed without any warning?
Name change was free 2 years ago fgs people changed their names for Christmas for example it looked nice. I don't know why some companies hate fun. Yet still they dont do anything about stuff and people they should.

Rant over.
 
1000003371.webp

ToS is and has always been readily available. It has always been known that, while not too often, features may be removed or in this case given to a different level of service. Always been a warning 😁
 
Simply Karina said:
View attachment 1012063

ToS is and has always been readily available. It has always been known that, while not too often, features may be removed or in this case given to a different level of service. Always been a warning 😁
Click to expand...
so that makes it okay to fk people over ? and over price features that provide basically nothing. would be similar to, a restaurant putting in fine print on the back of a menu an * , that states, prices are subject to change at any moment based on the feelings of management and the chef, with another * that reads, we are not legally responsible for any allergies you have from nuts or sea food because we have thus put here we are not responsible for your health.

why defend stupidity and over all scumbaggery?

Or is there some sort of incentive for moderators to defend piss poor decisions and scumbaggery by those that run this dump.
 
Prices raise at restaurants, grocery stores, theme parks, and other business all the time. Products change and evolve. Your inability to understand how the world works is not a burden on society.

Also, I can safely assure you nobody has their health at risk over VIP, Mr Allergies 🙂
 
OriginalScreenName said:
so that makes it okay to fk people over ? and over price features that provide basically nothing. would be similar to, a restaurant putting in fine print on the back of a menu an * , that states, prices are subject to change at any moment based on the feelings of management and the chef, with another * that reads, we are not legally responsible for any allergies you have from nuts or sea food because we have thus put here we are not responsible for your health.

why defend stupidity and over all scumbaggery?

Or is there some sort of incentive for moderators to defend piss poor decisions and scumbaggery by those that run this dump.
Click to expand...
I think Simply Karina was simply pointing out the TOS because Jwind was asking about getting their money back. SK never stated they were “defending” anything.

And to your first point, yes, a disclaimer or fine print is put on many things. From hairdryers, to a cup of hot coffee from a fast food joint, to chain saws, to web sites. Pretty common practice.
 
Simply Karina said:
Prices raise at restaurants, grocery stores, theme parks, and other business all the time. Products change and evolve. Your inability to understand how the world works is not a burden on society.

Also, I can safely assure you nobody has their health at risk over VIP, Mr Allergi
Click to expand...
Thanks for telling everyone you don't understand what i am saying with out saying you don't understand what i am saying .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it is interesting that the who ever made these dumbass changes proved that there is the ability to shut up random guests with out much effort , but that they would rather not do anything. And instead put one barely decent feature in a " VIP+" and mark it up to a price point, only jackasses who are brand new to this site MIGHT be willing to pay.

acting as if the fine print is there so thusly it excuses scummy practices is nonsense.

here i'll beat everyone to the next punch

Well just because it is there doesnt mean you have to pay for it.
 
TheDifference said:
I think Simply Karina was simply pointing out the TOS because Jwind was asking about getting their money back. SK never stated they were “defending” anything.

And to your first point, yes, a disclaimer or fine print is put on many things. From hairdryers, to a cup of hot coffee from a fast food joint, to chain saws, to web sites. Pretty common practice.
Click to expand...
thanks for pointing out that there is fine print put on a lot of things, is water wet ?

Slapping up a giant tos post, to me is a defending posture.

and it isn't just her, it is all admins and moderators rarely if ever say anything negative about this site or how it could be better in the forums.

in private may be different.

the lack of negative comments about this site by admin and moderators, and how it could be better in the forums does lead me to believe that who ever elects admins thusly makes sure said admins know adhere to and enforce some kind of rule be it written or unwritten that volunteers are not allowed to be negatively critical of this fire dumpster website.
 
OriginalScreenName said:
so that makes it okay to fk people over ? and over price features that provide basically nothing. would be similar to, a restaurant putting in fine print on the back of a menu an * , that states, prices are subject to change at any moment based on the feelings of management and the chef, with another * that reads, we are not legally responsible for any allergies you have from nuts or sea food because we have thus put here we are not responsible for your health.

why defend stupidity and over all scumbaggery?

Or is there some sort of incentive for moderators to defend piss poor decisions and scumbaggery by those that run this dump.
Click to expand...
You must be new here. 🥸
 
Soapie said:
Its ridiculous, but people have actually brought it, so thats just gonna reinforce the idea that this is fine 🤷

(Ps. The guest blocking thingy dosent seem to be locked behind the paywall in BC
Click to expand...
That is correct boys chat users have it. Whether it stays that way I’m not sure. Probably after it doubles In price it will go that way
 
I hope it dosent end up being a paid feature, its something thats been asked for for as long as ive been here, and makes a huge difference. It would be a genuine insult for it to be paywalled
 
I know some people have negative feelings about the recent changes with the VIP perk. And that’s perfectly understandable. But I think it’s also important to highlight things that people should feel positive about.

For example, the recent addition of software to better identify and remove CSAM. Also the creation of side chat rooms where no guests are allowed, only members/VIPs. And the most recent one is the addition of a new category for members to use when they want to report posts about child safety concerns.

IMG_3849.webp
 
Last edited:
babydolla said:
of course they locked autoblocking guests behind a pay wall, if they just let us block the guests as our accounts are now; then how else would they make up the loss in revenue from the blocked guests, that'll surely lose interest by being autoblocked???

the absolute state of decadence this website has achieved is honestly hilarious 👺

i didn't spend a dime on the vip i has now, nor the one i has in general chat, what makes them think i'm going to spend 50 - 100$ for this???

😂😂😂
Click to expand...
I have never paid a cent to to this site either - all have been gifted.

Only thing this this new feature will do is let the peddy parasites infiltrate more, they don't care how much they have to pay to indulge their vile behaviour.

But hey on a positive note "there is now a report feature" for CSAM because inappropriate content didn't work for that I'm guessing
Phone Call Reaction GIF


You cannot polish a turd and call it gold
 
Absolut Bitch said:
Taking something away from you, that you'd already purchased as part of a package, to then flog it back to you, with a few more bells and whistles, at a higher price is a pretty crappy move, but what do I know 🤷🏻‍♀️
Click to expand...
That's what I was pointing out.

Although I'm happy for the new report option.
 
TheDifference said:
I know some people have negative feelings about the recent changes with the VIP perk. And that’s perfectly understandable. But I think it’s also important to highlight things that people should feel positive about.

For example, the recent addition of software to better identify and remove CSAM. Also the creation of side chat rooms where no guests are allowed, only members/VIPs. And the most recent one is the addition of a new category for members to use when they want to report posts about child safety concerns.

View attachment 1012068
Click to expand...
This is nice but still won't change a thing regarding CSAM. The creeps already know how to avoid the staff enforcing the rules.

But the recent changes to what was already paid for by many users will not have a positive affect that the developers were hoping to achieve. I would be curious to see how it impacts the numbers of ******** that use Chat Avenue.
 
OriginalScreenName said:
yeah, so, wooo a big half off sale of VIP Plus, only $50.00!!!!!!

Regular Price, $100.00.

Who the F was smoking when setting the price for this ? I mean congrats on finally listening to users who wanted the option as a VIP to be able to mute guests, real friggin cute making that option only for VIP+ members at $100.00.

This chat site,{ with the amount of spam, criminals , adults posing as children , the mentally disabled who think they are heroes spamming the room, the disgusting adults section , the video/cam section ( which use to have normal users before that got Fd and is now nothing but another room for puddy players to assemble ) } is Not worth $50-$100 for " VIP+" 20 bucks USD is easy to flush down the toilet because that is pretty much what anyone spends on a fast food drive through which is the only reason why regular VIP was " worth " buying.

I'd really be curious as to who the genius was that decided this was a good price point for the extra option to mute guests. And if it was a group of people who decided, if it was an AI program, or just one general knob who decided by themself.

along with the purchase option for " Gold " hilarious absolutely hilarious, i wouldn't spend anything on that gold, the idea of buying a websites " gold " was for actual online video games, aka Pay to play . at least when video game companies rip off customers, the customers get something from it to continue on or advance in a game.



What is annoying is to see who ever has the final decision on chat ave to make changes to the website like features or making new rooms or discontinuing rooms, etc; what i find a little annoying, is to see a tiny bit of effort made to make a change and barely barely in a positive way, i cant even consider the efforts made to even be worth called being half assed. I imagine an actual intern for the operations of this website could do a better half assed job, and job is a loose word for interns ( because for those of you who don't know, interns are basically volunteers that get to say they have had on the job training )..

Also, for the genius out there, what users were requesting with the ability to auto mute guests, we meant for that option to be added on to existing VIP accounts, not something to dangle over our heads with a brand new insane fee.

so far i only know of one person who purchased VIP Plus, and said it isnt worth it.
Click to expand...
Quit whining like a bitch and grow up.
 
Liz Blair said:
This is nice but still won't change a thing regarding CSAM. The creeps already know how to avoid the staff enforcing the rules.

But the recent changes to what was already paid for by many users will not have a positive affect that the developers were hoping to achieve. I would be curious to see how it impacts the numbers of ******** that use Chat Avenue.
Click to expand...
Hi, I was just trying to focus on some of the positives. That’s all 🙂

Happy Friday 😎
 
TheDifference said:
I know some people have negative feelings about the recent changes with the VIP perk. And that’s perfectly understandable. But I think it’s also important to highlight things that people should feel positive about.

For example, the recent addition of software to better identify and remove CSAM. Also the creation of side chat rooms where no guests are allowed, only members/VIPs. And the most recent one is the addition of a new category for members to use when they want to report posts about child safety concerns.

View attachment 1012068
Click to expand...
Yeah, this aint it. Singles chat has a known spammer thats permanently banned in every room that hes been in. Now chatmaster refuses to ban him because hes bought something like 5 VIP accounts, and all he does now is posted his nano-sized member, doxxes people and spams. You look like HR PuffnStuff with this post.
 
Whos_Laffing_now said:
Yeah, this aint it. Singles chat has a known spammer thats permanently banned in every room that hes been in. Now chatmaster refuses to ban him because hes bought something like 5 VIP accounts, and all he does now is posted his nano-sized member, doxxes people and spams. You look like HR PuffnStuff with this post.
Click to expand...
The amount I tried to get banned and did get banned VIP related was mental singles not having a admin for 2 years turned it into a SESS pit and 2 mods
 
DynamicDylan said:
The amount I tried to get banned and did get banned VIP related was mental singles not having a admin for 2 years turned it into a SESS pit and 2 mods
Click to expand...
You did get people banned that needed to a long time ago. However, its nuts that Kratos got a hold of his parents AMEX card and proceeded to buy a bunch of VIPs, knowing he wouldnt immediately be banned. Theres literally 3 Kratos accounts, another one of his is named "jesus" and I believe he has one more. This issue doesnt fall on ADMIN but the hire ups who haven't realized the formula of profit first, never works. Any new users coming in to see him posting his stank-low immediately leaves and never returns. Is CM afraid of charge backs or something?
 
If yoy think about it this way. The site is also a business. It needs money to be able to pay for cloudflare and all the other expenses. I’m not condoning that banned ******** or spammers should buy VIP. But also without some profits the site wouldn’t exist. It’s a shame the wrong people buy it to try and get away with wrong doing
 
If someone used their parents credit card, and you have this as a fact, why hasn’t he been reported for fraud/theft?
 
DynamicDylan said:
Well if parents didn’t authorise it it would be theft right?
Click to expand...
Yes. Also fraud because he’s taken the card and purposely spent it knowing it’s not his to use - and no consent given.

I’m guessing (hoping) he’s across the Atlantic because here he’d get a stern telling off whereas the States would actually punish the cretin.
 
-Luka said:
Yes. Also fraud because he’s taken the card and purposely spent it knowing it’s not his to use - and no consent given.

I’m guessing (hoping) he’s across the Atlantic because here he’d get a stern telling off whereas the States would actually punish the cretin.
Click to expand...
The UK punishes nobody lol we all know how it feels so see criminals walk free but that’s a story for another day
 
DynamicDylan said:
If yoy think about it this way. The site is also a business. It needs money to be able to pay for cloudflare and all the other expenses. I’m not condoning that banned ******** or spammers should buy VIP. But also without some profits the site wouldn’t exist. It’s a shame the wrong people buy it to try and get away with wrong doing
Click to expand...
Regardless of VIP +, allowing someone to purchase VIP when they've been permanently banned for years, then refusing to ban their accounts which are used solely to post photos of their genitals and what not, is inexcusable and is literally the same problem we had 4 years ago with Sthcalguy.
Soapie said:
Business, sure.

But (eventually) £100 for some cosmetics is ridiculous regardless of anything else 😂
Click to expand...
I doubt VIP + will ever be $100. That was a marketing ploy to try and make the $50 price seem reasonable. Its the same marketing ploy now used on Black Friday. Because of inflation, the sale prices on a lot of products are now at regular prices due to tarrifs and prices that never went down after covid. It wouldnt be an issue if features weren't removed from original VIP users. Invisibility was good for avoiding pms from the bots. The second you went online, you get hit with 2 pms, depending if you have it set to only users.
-Luka said:
If someone used their parents credit card, and you have this as a fact, why hasn’t he been reported for fraud/theft?
Click to expand...
This is speculation, but seeing as how he has no job and has a history of begging women to buy him VIP, then suddenly he has like 5 VIP accounts, its very suspicious. Furthermore, he was posting photos of the American Express card next to his genitals. I dont know anyone who would post photos of their credit card, so its more than likely his parents who obviously are absent in his life.
 
Whos_Laffing_now said:
Regardless of VIP +, allowing someone to purchase VIP when they've been permanently banned for years, then refusing to ban their accounts which are used solely to post photos of their genitals and what not, is inexcusable and is literally the same problem we had 4 years ago with Sthcalguy.

I doubt VIP + will ever be $100. That was a marketing ploy to try and make the $50 price seem reasonable. Its the same marketing ploy now used on Black Friday. Because of inflation, the sale prices on a lot of products are now at regular prices due to tarrifs and prices that never went down after covid. It wouldnt be an issue if features weren't removed from original VIP users. Invisibility was good for avoiding pms from the bots. The second you went online, you get hit with 2 pms, depending if you have it set to only users.

This is speculation, but seeing as how he has no job and has a history of begging women to buy him VIP, then suddenly he has like 5 VIP accounts, its very suspicious. Furthermore, he was posting photos of the American Express card next to his genitals. I dont know anyone who would post photos of their credit card, so its more than likely his parents who obviously are absent in his life.
Click to expand...

kratos is from india, so its not his parents, it actually belongs to some old woman named mary-beth who he convinced to mail it to him while pretending he works for microsoft 🤷🏼‍♀️
 
Whos_Laffing_now said:
Yeah, this aint it. Singles chat has a known spammer thats permanently banned in every room that hes been in. Now chatmaster refuses to ban him because hes bought something like 5 VIP accounts, and all he does now is posted his nano-sized member, doxxes people and spams. You look like HR PuffnStuff with this post.
Click to expand...
Everything in my post is factual. I try and focus on the positive, while acknowledging there is room for improvement. That’s all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top