Why has the USA Never Elected a Female President?
- Thread starter Babygator
- Start date
purplerose
Gold Member
im going to bite at this , even though I probably shouldn't.
the USA tries to elect one, except equality for women come into play here. and the office of the president after all is a boys club. they bank on that. hopefully this time its different. I feel like (in my opinion) if more people couldve gotten over the fact that the last candidate forgave her husband for smoking weed *coughgettingheadintheovaloffice'sbackroomcough* like millions of ladies do on a daily basis, we couldve avoided a lot of the past 8 years. but that didn't happen.
the USA tries to elect one, except equality for women come into play here. and the office of the president after all is a boys club. they bank on that. hopefully this time its different. I feel like (in my opinion) if more people couldve gotten over the fact that the last candidate forgave her husband for smoking weed *coughgettingheadintheovaloffice'sbackroomcough* like millions of ladies do on a daily basis, we couldve avoided a lot of the past 8 years. but that didn't happen.
Would Americans accept a half-Japanese person who is 4'11'' as their president 😅😅?
babydolla
Gold Member
Soundz123
Silver Member
as of right now, i don’t like her chances. i don’t care who wins, but it seems like trump has most of the momentum right now and kamala isn’t really saying/doing anything
This is now unofficially no longer a requirement
It seems that the US prefers to elect males that grab women by the ladybits rather than electing women to the Presidency.
babydolla
Gold Member
for now...
until the candidate is a woman that just-so-happens-to-be a lesbian...
ive grabbed some ladybits in my days & i don't just mean my own, ya know??? 😜
Pinky
Gold Member
Ok, babydonald. 🤣
purplerose
Gold Member
it may not be a requirement. but I felt it was a strong statement and needed it.This is now unofficially no longer a requirement
It seems that the US prefers to elect males that grab women by the ladybits rather than electing women to the Presidency.
jamie40134
Bronze Member
Just imagine shutting down the White House 5-8 days a month...... Just because
Who would want the nuke codes in the hands of a woman with PMS ? 🤣🤣
Ken_Kaneki
Gold Member
Women didn’t have rights.
!tulsa!
Gold Member
This thread and other conversations concerning civil rights should highlight to everyone how fragile and new this awesome thing we’re doing in the United States is. The 19th amendment was signed in 1920. Just barely more than 100 years ago. This was merely the first step in a journey though. It took until 1962 for the last state, New Mexico, to sign law allowing for all Native Americans to be included in the vote. Another decade passed before title IX of the education amendments was signed into law in 1972, preventing discrimination in educational facilities on the basis of gender.
Barely more than 5 decades ago women were still not being afforded equality. Whether we are talking about women’s rights, equality of races or gender, or even just the right to vote, this is just 50 some odd years in coming to fruition.
Please please please, remember that this is all still very new. Exercise your right to vote, not just in the presidential election but primarily in your local elections. The electoral college makes it ESSENTIAL that you are involved on the local level, as the popular vote is not what’s counted for the presidency.
Barely more than 5 decades ago women were still not being afforded equality. Whether we are talking about women’s rights, equality of races or gender, or even just the right to vote, this is just 50 some odd years in coming to fruition.
Please please please, remember that this is all still very new. Exercise your right to vote, not just in the presidential election but primarily in your local elections. The electoral college makes it ESSENTIAL that you are involved on the local level, as the popular vote is not what’s counted for the presidency.