Are people in prison allowed on here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 292068
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 292068

Guest
I have proof of a user who is currently in prison on drug trafficking and is banned in Gen chat (or was). I've never seen this question asked, but I figured I'd ask. I personally don't think they should even be allowed a phone or the ability to communicate with the outside World. On another chat site, there was a guy who cat fished women and ended up being an inmate in for life for killing and robbing a pawn shop owner.

@DynamicDylan I can provide proof if need be. He just swung by and helped himself to a mild stroke and spammed the room about rabbis. He think he might be listening to too much Ye.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
@FacialConfidant I'd agree with you if this wasn't a 13+ site. You dont have to be prejudiced to all prisoners to think that prisoners and children shouldn't mix. most of the prison population would even agree with that. this is a classic example of a semantics based argument that would only ever happen online. because I am 100% sure if you had a kid and your friend goes "hey is it okay if i drop by and bring my friend who just got out of prison?" that your answer would be an automatic no. and if you try saying "idk maybe I'd let them come by and see if they're a good person to be around my kid" then you're either lying or you'd be a terrible parent.
 
Last edited:
They're not allowed cell phones and they're only allowed on computers in the library through supervision. A CO isn't going to sit there and let a prisoner type this crap out, ranting about rabbis and Jewish people. They're generally only


f2wQ8gO.jpg

They're generally not allowed on social media but there are chat sites for strictly inmates, this isn't one of them.

cZdhFdb.jpg
 
Frombo said:
@FacialConfidant I'd agree with you if this wasn't a 13+ site. You dont have to be prejudiced to all prisoners to think that prisoners and children shouldn't mix. most of the prison population would even agree with that. this is a classic example of an semantics based argument that would only ever happen online. because I am 100% if you had a kid and your friend goes "hey is it okay if i drop by and bring my friend who just got out of prison?" that your answer would be an automatic no. and if you try saying "idk maybe I'd let them come by and see if they're a good person to be around my kid" then you're either lying or you'd be a terrible parent.
Click to expand...
Exactly, and to make it easy, you just disallow it, only because it's a 13+ site. Vetting people would never happen or work, so there's no need to bring in the "what if it were petty crime?" argument.
 
Look, I understand what you *mean* and *want* but it doesn't change the thread title and the question posed. If you want change and you want there to be a rule that if someone says they're a prisoner that they be actionable based on that alone, then I suggest saying that instead of just beating around the bush and making a general query.

I think you should've posted, "I think claiming to be a prisoner here should be a bannable offense since it's a 13+ site." And then it could be settled whether that's going to be implemented or not. It's a semantics argument because you guys made it one.
 
I'm not going to engage you anymore because you're not getting it and now putting words into my mouth. This thread can be closed. I'm glad most people seem to agree with my concern and suggestion, at least.
 
its not beating around the bush when its a genuine question though. this is purely semantics at this point. @FacialConfidant you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. who tf cares how it was worded? I think you should have worded what you just said like this "I'm feeling extra mad today and don't like when other people have opinions, so I'm going to go on forums and argue about the way people worded things"
 
Boba Fett said:
They're not allowed cell phones and they're only allowed on computers in the library through supervision. A CO isn't going to sit there and let a prisoner type this crap out, ranting about rabbis and Jewish people. They're generally only


f2wQ8gO.jpg

They're generally not allowed on social media but there are chat sites for strictly inmates, this isn't one of them.

cZdhFdb.jpg
Click to expand...
Oh, this one isn't quite a cannibal serial killer like Jeffrey Dahmer, but he's an avowed homophobe, he's proud of it and has enough fascist speech to produce ten Hitlers for the next two generations, @flame_song even tries to ban him permanently from the room, but he always comes back. But I swear, it was really cool to hear in a lesbian room that I'm a cancer and I deserve to die for it. Homophobia is a crime, right? So he's a criminal, right? Hate speech is a crime, right? Fascism is a crime, right? He's a criminal in a lesbian room, committing the crime of homophobia against lesbians in the room, right? Or not?
https://imgur.com/opxa3Oc
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FacialConfidant said:
I think this kind of sums up a good explanation for Boba, too. Moderators and the site take action against people who break rules. Moderators and the site don't have a way to prevent people who plan on breaking rules from entering the site. It's that simple.

So to answer the thread, prisoners might be allowed to enter the site but prisoners who break the rules are dealt with. If you want the site to prevent all people who plan on breaking rules from entering, Boba, I suggest you create a system that checks for the person's intention when logging on.
Click to expand...
They should check HRs intentions & if an admin or mod has been given proof by more than 1 person about a pedophile prisoner etc and they do nothing about it like HR has done many times that said person should be banned immediately but General protects people like that is what everyone with a straight normal mind knows 😉
 
Lmao these idiots clearly don't understand so it's pointless let the pedophile defenders carry on with there wild explanations
 
I was in general when I exposed and posted a ******** real life sex offender record multiple times and told mods and still nothing and I wasn't the only 1 who posted it so I know 1st hand more than on 3 occasions I've shown proof and they didn't do shiit
 
I wanted to leave a cool tip here for us. I think that every exchange of ideas is aggregator. And it's possible to learn from those who think the site is a "wonderland" and those who think it's a "broken avenue", this is a discussion forum, so it's normal that we all have different opinions here. But the problem is that when the debate starts to have a lot of personal attacks, it becomes much more like a personal fight than a debate, and that takes people away from the discussion and makes a lot of people not want to participate anymore. So, it would be really cool if all of us here didn't make personal attacks against each other, but just the ideas that we don't agree with, I know it's hard, we could try. 😁You know?
guns n roses art GIF
 
chatmaster doesn’t care unless money is involved

mods work for free and will defend themselves doing the bare minimum regardless of pushback

disgruntled people both start and engage in online drama, whether on forums or chat

that’s chat ave
 
GFB said:
I wanted to leave a cool tip here for us. I think that every exchange of ideas is aggregator. And it's possible to learn from those who think the site is a "wonderland" and those who think it's a "broken avenue", this is a discussion forum, so it's normal that we all have different opinions here. But the problem is that when the debate starts to have a lot of personal attacks, it becomes much more like a personal fight than a debate, and that takes people away from the discussion and makes a lot of people not want to participate anymore. So, it would be really cool if all of us here didn't make personal attacks against each other, but just the ideas that we don't agree with, I know it's hard, we could try. 😁You know?
guns n roses art GIF
Click to expand...
Yes, I know that there are people here that we want to curse even the tenth generation, but if we start doing this, we will never be able to bring new people to debate, discuss new ideas and proposals with us, and we will all be here just drying ice and blocking the sun with a sieve. We can't lose reason!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@GFB everyone was on topic until HR and Difference started attacking boba fett lol. they just aren't as good as everyone else at that game because they defend p's so people have lots of easy shots. they wanted to play a dumb game, and they won a dumb prize.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top