Should #1 Chat Avenue; SEGREGATE itself further with chats for different ethnicities????

Status
Not open for further replies.

babydolla

Gold Member
hai friends, ๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

dolla-sama is back on this fine american sunday morning, the lord's land on the lord's day;
with more riveting polls for everyone to enjoy, vote, & discuss about....

corporate forced me to take a paid vacation (๐Ÿ™„) you know how that is right, my fellow working class huma... i mean friends???

anyways, this morning's edition is an interesting, & possibly controversial suggestion poll;

should different ethnicities has their own dedicated chats???

look; i already know what everyone is thinking about this topic ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ

giphy.webp


it's cool though i has special privileges that allow me to make this thread,

you see i'm half japanese, so i carry my M (minority) card everywhere that i go ๐ŸŒ

but it's just the nature of the beast (chat-avenue) to segregate minority groups; gay / lesbian chat, girls / boy chat, teen / kid chat, general / singles chat... so would it really be that much of a problem if we had; white chat, asian chat, black chat, angel chat, muslim chat, jewish chat, italian chat, palestinian chat, indian chat, chinese chat, russian chat, ukrainian chat, native american chat, etc?????

i don't think that would be an issue, nor should be an issue to even suggest; if anything i could make the argument that it's more racist not be so inclusive that each major ethnicity has their own chat dedicated to everything that makes them, them; we has gay chat for the gays, & girls chat for the girls so why can't we has a jewish chat, or a black chat??? ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€

i think by doing so we create a safer, relaxed, & more inclusive environment for the rest of our minority users who are not being recognized like the homosexuals (๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ) are; which i think would help, & lessen the issues with racism by 13% (actual statistic ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ)

but that's just me, what does the rest of the #1 chat-avenue community think??? ๐Ÿต

vote, & discuss

peace,
god-bless ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
 
Since youโ€™re determined to drag me back here by continuing to tag me and to lie about what I said let me make this crystal clear. I have never once called you a Nazi. Ever. I simply stated the facts that you have a history of posting pics of Adolf Hitler and you also drew a Adolf Hitler mustache on your own face and used that as your pfp here. Please stop tagging me.
I am one that called her a Nazi. I may be more triggered as I got relatives who were alive during the German Socialist Movement. Hitler was never funny nor was his followers.
I had to ketchup face Luka. That is a doxxed picture of Hannah Faye for sure.
 
Since youโ€™re determined to drag me back here by continuing to tag me and to lie about what I said let me make this crystal clear. I have never once called you a Nazi. Ever. I simply stated the facts that you have a history of posting pics of Adolf Hitler and you also drew a Adolf Hitler mustache on your own face and used that as your pfp here. Please stop tagging me.
You know I never love to stir the pot, but I do love to point out some hypocrisy. You shouldnโ€™t claim someone is dragging you back here when youโ€™re liking comments saying she should be perminantly banned. Thats you choosing to be involved. And thereโ€™s nothing wrong with that.

These forums arenโ€™t all about helping people who have been banned by the spam filter and then flexing in the mirror. Itโ€™s also a place to engage in discussion and, guess what, not all of them are going to be to your liking. Iโ€™ve said more than once now that my views are definitely polar opposite to @babydolla. But I can engage in discourse about a subject where our opinions differ without the need to attack her on her views.

Apart from a few odd comments to Hannah, which Iโ€™ll say right here right now, Babydolla, that was a **** move, she has never let her opinions influence the way she treats people. So why not tell us your views? Should we have segregated chats based on race/ethnicity? Itโ€™s a no from me, as it is from the majority of people who have voted. Which Iโ€™d suggest is a good thing.

At the end of the day, there are going to be people here who agree with you and people who donโ€™t. Part of being an adult is accepting those differing opinions and getting on with your damn life.

Now bend over, Iโ€™m going to insert this stick firmly back into your rectum so you feel whole again.

Love you Diffy<3
 
@Finn2.0 lol thanks for that, it made me laugh. What I meant was Iโ€™m not interested in being dragged back into the discussions in this thread. I said my piece and was done commenting. Until the OP started lying about what I said.

But adding a reaction emoji to a post I like isnโ€™t hypocritical and doesnโ€™t add to the discussion. I have been following this thread because Iโ€™m interested to see the responses. The OP likes to create threads like this to get people wound up. I think it makes her feel a sense of (false) importance and also gives her the attention she so desperately craves. But thatโ€™s a bit off topic. As for your question, I made my position clear in my very first post, I said No.

Thanks for the stick ๐Ÿ˜‰
 
Personally. I think segregation is ****. . HOWEVER . I DO think it would be the beez kneez to see side rooms for different languages (for my own selfish reasons, I want to practice other languages, and what better way to do that than to immerse oneself in a room speaking a different language).
 
This coming from a person who has a history of posting pictures of Adolf Hitler and who had a profile pic of their own face with an Adolf Hitler moustache drawn on it. In addition to other racist, transphobic remarks and pictures. And now they are suggesting segregating Jewish people??? I hope that people (and forums UMs) see this for what it clearly is.
I normally donโ€™t interact with you because of what a horrible person I believe you are. You historically display hate speech against trans people, black and jewish people, etc. But when you are this blatant about it someone needs to say something. So I did. Segregation was abolished in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act. Itโ€™s sad (but not surprising) to see it still exists some 60 years later. Iโ€™m done here.

@TheDifference,

sounds awful lot like youโ€™re indirectly calling me a nazi ๐Ÿ™Š

all the while blatantly disregarded all the other races & ethnicities i listed including some of my own, you also blatantly disregarded the context of the suggestion, also the fact im a minority myself being only half white; all you hyperfocused on what my choice to use the word segregate, which is weird bc there are already segregated chats here ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

this was just your frivolous attempt to derail my thread, & have to closed (which didnt work) bc you has a personal disliking for me; but you cant, bc there isnt anything inherently wrong with the suggestion, & you didnt expect ppl to actually think i has a valid argument l0l

who is really the nazi here?? ๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†”๏ธ
p.s; i tagged you again, @TheDifference, are you gonna cry?

on topic; i think its actually concerning that ppl has such a problem with this suggestion, & find it to be an outlandish idea; why wouldnt you want more segregated chats for individual races / ethnic groups, especially the ones which find themselves to be the biggest targets of racist zealotsโ€ฆ

u ppl argue that this will cause a race war of some kind, but you donโ€™t see gross examples of overt homophobia on gay chat as @Inkandtatts pointed out; why is this a risk / concern / fear when discussing segregated chats for different races, why isnt it a factor for the chats segregated by sexual orientation or gender???

thats actually kind of weird to me that its fine to has segregated chats for homosexuals, but not individual races ๐Ÿ™ˆ
 
why wouldnt you want more segregated chats for individual races / ethnic groups, especially the ones which find themselves to be the biggest targets of racist zealotsโ€ฆ
But it would literally be putting them all in one place to be targeted by those same racist zealots. There is no way to verify someone's race/ethnicity here so you're going to get the trolls targeting these rooms.
 
But it would literally be putting them all in one place to be targeted by those same racist zealots. There is no way to verify someone's race/ethnicity here so you're going to get the trolls targeting these rooms.

no way to verify someones sexual orientation, or gender, & if u really want me to make the argument there isnt even really anyway to verify someones age ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

yet gay / lesbian, boy / girl, teen / kid chats all still exist; why is that??

not to mention, as ink&tats pointed out, there is little to no incidents of homophobia on gay chat which is a segregated chat where a peculiar group of generally the same kind of people all congregate ๐Ÿฅณ
 
no way to verify someones sexual orientation, or gender, & if u really want me to make the argument there isnt even really anyway to verify someones age ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

yet gay / lesbian, boy / girl, teen / kid chats all still exist; why is that??

not to mention, as ink&tats pointed out, there is little to no incidents of homophobia on gay chat which is a segregated chat where a peculiar group of people all congregate ๐Ÿฅณ
I see your points, but there are plenty of examples of adults being in Kids/Teens (we all know why), males being in Girls/Lesbian for the sole purpose of trolling, and even the odd idiot who thinks Lesbian Chat is his personal domain to convert women back to straightdom. I know, one of the idiots used to frequent my room.

Not to mention the very real issue of a long-term Lesbian Chat mod turning out to be a male.

Gay Chat does indeed seem to be an outlier in regards to what we're calling the segregated chat. This is either because the staff are excellent at quickly identifying and removing issues, or because most trolls are too insecure to be surrounded by so much pee pee.

I suppose it comes down to, segregating by race seems like a much bigger thing than by sexuality. I mean I'm all for it if it's something everyone wants, but I can see it become less about race and more about racism. The only exception I can see is if there are specific rooms for non-English speakers. But then you have the whole debacle of finding mods who speak the language, and deciding just how many foreign language rooms you offer.
 
Forced segregation is a huge no-no (and I don't see that this is being advocated for). Allowing people to go where they want to freely while providing a venue for similar people to associate with similar people is not offensive, hence why we have a Gay Chat but if I so desired I could roam into General Chat, Adult Chat, Lesbian Chat, or even Girls Chat. It's the same as having Asian community centers, "ladies night" at the pub, and the various types of bars that exist.

The only way you'd know whether an "Asian Chat" (using that as an example) would be worthwhile would be whether those that would use such a room want such a room - or whether there is a ready and waiting market for it. Looking at sites that do have these rooms, they get a handful of people in them. Staffing them would be another issue, as raised by @-Luka

I don't know why gay chat was created but I'd guess it was so that gay men could easily find and talk to other gay men - which is kinda the point I think is being made about these suggested rooms.

Gay Chat does indeed seem to be an outlier in regards to what we're calling the segregated chat. This is either because the staff are excellent at quickly identifying and removing issues, or because most trolls are too insecure to be surrounded by so much pee pee.
All the above ๐Ÿ˜
 
Forced segregation is a huge no-no (and I don't see that this is being advocated for). Allowing people to go where they want to freely while providing a venue for similar people to associate with similar people is not offensive, hence why we have a Gay Chat but if I so desired I could roam into General Chat, Adult Chat, Lesbian Chat, or even Girls Chat. It's the same as having Asian community centers, "ladies night" at the pub, and the various types of bars that exist.

The only way you'd know whether an "Asian Chat" (using that as an example) would be worthwhile would be whether those that would use such a room want such a room - or whether there is a ready and waiting market for it. Looking at sites that do have these rooms, they get a handful of people in them. Staffing them would be another issue, as raised by @-Luka

I don't know why gay chat was created but I'd guess it was so that gay men could easily find and talk to other gay men - which is kinda the point I think is being made about these suggested rooms.


All the above ๐Ÿ˜

even if i was suggesting forced segregation, which youre right, im not; am not entirely sure how that would even be possibleโ€ฆ

it just so happens to be that segregated is the right word to use here, which im certain the use of that word being associated with races is what has everyone so riled up about ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

pretending this suggestion comes into fruition, i imagine it would exactly as it does with the segregated chats we has now; you would freely be able to use whatever chat you like, but alternatively you will has the option to chat with for example; other fine jewish folks if youre jewish, or other muslims if youre muslim, etc

it would provide exactly what gay chat provides for gay men, an outlet to meet & chat with other ppl of the same race in a safe space to do so ๐Ÿ˜‡

as for staffing; i happily volunteer to administrate white chat ๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
The only way you'd know whether an "Asian Chat" (using that as an example) would be worthwhile would be whether those that would use such a room want such a room - or whether there is a ready and waiting market for it. Looking at sites that do have these rooms, they get a handful of people in them. Staffing them would be another issue, as raised by @-Luka
But then this raises the question of how "segregated" (for lack of a better term) we go. An Asian Chat, isn't going to work if it's 99% Indian and you've got a couple of Japanese individuals trying to find a place to fit in.

I'm arguing here like I'm staunchly against it but, if it were introduced, I'd be over it in double quick time. I suppose it's more of a logistics issue than anything. Seems like it would be hard to introduce and maintain. Let's just make two big rooms. 11-18 Chat and Big People Chat. We can all mix together in one giant melting pot. Except @-Luka. He's got his own room where it's him, Jess, and Hannah 24/7.
 
relevant poll;


peace,
god-bless ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top