The Musings of DeletedMember7

[Deleted member 308590]

My brain, eyes , ears, common sense is great. You reject the evidence of your eyes ears and brain. What 'sources' do you have to confirm that a man is a woman because he says he feels like a woman? What ' sources' do you have that confirm that people can be 'non binary ' ? It's pseudoscience. It's not imperical truth your 'sources' are from activists

That means no I never read pseudoscience i.e your 'scientific paper '

My brain, eyes , ears, common sense is great. You reject the evidence of your eyes ears and brain. What 'sources' do you have to confirm that a man is a woman because he says he feels like a woman? What ' sources' do you have that confirm that people can be 'non binary ' ? It's pseudoscience. It's not imperical truth your 'sources' are from activists

See above

 

[Deleted member 308590]

@emileh tell me how any of my beliefs, what I say is 'far right ' 'bigotry' ' hatred' ok

1. Women should have a right to single sex spaces

2. Trans women should not be in women's sports or changing areas because they are men

3. Children cannot consent to puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, surgery
4. People should not have to use compelled speech to validate others ,
5. Trans women should not be in women's breastfeeding classes because they are men

6. People should not be fired, cancelled for not using compelled speech, pronouns

7. Men convicted of a crime
should not be moved to women's prisons if they identify as a woman.

8. Language should not be twisted distorted to erase the meaning of woman.

9. People shouldn't be labelled as cisgender. Male/ female, man/woman is suffice
10. Feelings should not have precedence over feelings.

Blah blah blah. Agenda agenda. Obvious prejudice. Quotes on cherry picked non-articles and tropes with very little basis in fact and that don't actually apply to everyday existence for the majority of normal people but are beloved of the far right/religious right...

Now read the scientific paper that I've suggested in my previous post and try your best to digest and understand it.

I have a bet with myself what your response is going to be. Let's see if I win.

Is that answering my questions? No

 

[Deleted member 308590]

Since when did the gay rights movement indoctrinate children with an ideology 'teaching' them that not conforming to gender stereotypes means they were 'born in the wrong body' and the solution is puberty blockers, cross sex hormones making them sterile for life and mutilated body parts? They weren't.

The gay rights movement were not demanding compelled speech and getting people fired, cancelled if others did not validate them and use compelled speech.

The gay rights movement were not demanding to use the changing areas of the opposite sex, compete in the sports of the opposite sex.

It's an entirely different argument. Trans/ gender ideology is absolutely a threat to children and it's propogated by trans activists forcing their insane ideology onto institutions.

The same arguments used against the trans community have not been used multiple times before, ever.

Having breast reduction surgery or a nose job doesn't make people.... Sterile for life. Heed the words breast reduction. Big difference between reduction and removal, mutilation and yet it's happening to children because of an ideology forced onto them.

Still on the same old bigoted agenda pushing rant? Same shite, different thread.

Dogmatists gonna dogmatise eh?

Is that offering a counter argument? No

 

[emileh]

That means no I never read pseudoscience i.e your 'scientific paper '

See above

If you haven't read and understood the actual science, meaning reading the scientific paper I cited that had been published and peer reviewed, note: Published, peer reviewed scientific paper which is the antithesis of the pseudoscience you think exists, taken it into account or formulated a response to refute it based on scientific argument then you have nothing to say that means anything. It's all just your dogma driven, bigoted, transphobic opinions repeated over and over and over ad nauseum.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

Ad nauseam, this entire thread ^^

 

[emileh]

Ad nauseam, this entire thread ^^

Well, your part in it anyway. Glad you finally agree.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

Merely being asked a simple question like what a woman is and they go batshit crazy. Not only that but they can't even give an answer

She couldn't answer

 

[emileh]

She couldn't answer

I gave you answers repeatedly. Based on the science. I also gave you reasons that the answers were the way they were.

Those answers are in the two threads that you've been spamming with your transphobia. Anyone that can be bothered can go back through them and see my responses for themselves.

I cited a published, peer reviewed scientific paper that gave a good explanation based on biological science. You didn't and won't read it. Probably because it'll tell you that your dearly held transphobic opinions are worthless.

Unlike you, if you'd produced properly peer reviewed papers to support your claims, I'd be willing to read them, understand them and be persuaded to change my mind if they held up to scrutiny.

That's science. What you use is pseudoscience, rhetoric and hyperbole.

 

[emileh]

I should add that you did exactly the same thing under your previous account Tall man. Probably under others as well.

You were shown to be a transphobic bigot then and the same is happening now.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

Do you think it's ok for a woman to get her leg broke in soccer, her sporting career ended forever when a trans woman broke her leg? The reason it happened is because of their trans inclusive policy in sport

Do you think it's ok when trans women activists biological males win woman of the year awards, is it ok for a lesbian to get kicked out of a gym and banned because she objects to a trans woman, biological man staring at her while she's naked? Do you think it's ok that a trans woman, a biological man won the world's strongest WOMAN competition? That's what my first post was about.

Blah blah dogma dogma...

You couldn't actually debate your way out of a paper bag. I answered all of your questions at various points in this thread and did you debate them using credible sources to refute? No. You just continue to use straw man arguments (which are blatant and transparent) and continue to trot out your mindless bigotry.

You're not even a particularly good troll. You certainly have no argument of any substance here.

0/10 Do better. Oh wait, you can't

That was her reply ^^^

 

[emileh]

That was her reply ^^^

No, these are my replies

I gave you answers repeatedly. Based on the science. I also gave you reasons that the answers were the way they were.

Those answers are in the two threads that you've been spamming with your transphobia. Anyone that can be bothered can go back through them and see my responses for themselves.

I cited a published, peer reviewed scientific paper that gave a good explanation based on biological science. You didn't and won't read it. Probably because it'll tell you that your dearly held transphobic opinions are worthless.

Unlike you, if you'd produced properly peer reviewed papers to support your claims, I'd be willing to read them, understand them and be persuaded to change my mind if they held up to scrutiny.

That's science. What you use is pseudoscience, rhetoric and hyperbole.

I should add that you did exactly the same thing under your previous account Tall man. Probably under others as well.

You were shown to be a transphobic bigot then and the same is happening now.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

First she says I'm Bread, then Joseph and now Tall man. I wonder who she will say next. I'm neither of those people however I have seen their posts on here. Their debating style inspired me lol. In her woke deluded head if people understand biology and say women should have single sex spaces they're.... Transphobic bigots with an agenda. She's completely intolerant of anyone if their views differ from hers.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

I gave you answers repeatedly. Based on the science. I also gave you reasons that the answers were the way they were.

Those answers are in the two threads that you've been spamming with your transphobia. Anyone that can be bothered can go back through them and see my responses for themselves.

I cited a published, peer reviewed scientific paper that gave a good explanation based on biological science. You didn't and won't read it. Probably because it'll tell you that your dearly held transphobic opinions are worthless.

Unlike you, if you'd produced properly peer reviewed papers to support your claims, I'd be willing to read them, understand them and be persuaded to change my mind if they held up to scrutiny.

That's science. What you use is pseudoscience, rhetoric and hyperbole.

You gave NO answers to your posts that I QUOTED. If you actually READ you will see that. Ad hominem is all you had repeatedly

 

[emileh]

You gave NO answers to your posts that I QUOTED. If you actually READ you will see that. Ad hominem is all you had repeatedly

No, these are my replies

I gave you answers repeatedly. Based on the science. I also gave you reasons that the answers were the way they were.

Those answers are in the two threads that you've been spamming with your transphobia. Anyone that can be bothered can go back through them and see my responses for themselves.

I cited a published, peer reviewed scientific paper that gave a good explanation based on biological science. You didn't and won't read it. Probably because it'll tell you that your dearly held transphobic opinions are worthless.

Unlike you, if you'd produced properly peer reviewed papers to support your claims, I'd be willing to read them, understand them and be persuaded to change my mind if they held up to scrutiny.

That's science. What you use is pseudoscience, rhetoric and hyperbole.

I should add that you did exactly the same thing under your previous account Tall man. Probably under others as well.

You were shown to be a transphobic bigot then and the same is happening now.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

In this thread and the other one

 

[emileh]

In this thread and the other one

I gave you answers repeatedly. Based on the science. I also gave you reasons that the answers were the way they were.

Those answers are in the two threads that you've been spamming with your transphobia. Anyone that can be bothered can go back through them and see my responses for themselves.

I cited a published, peer reviewed scientific paper that gave a good explanation based on biological science. You didn't and won't read it. Probably because it'll tell you that your dearly held transphobic opinions are worthless.

Unlike you, if you'd produced properly peer reviewed papers to support your claims, I'd be willing to read them, understand them and be persuaded to change my mind if they held up to scrutiny.

That's science. What you use is pseudoscience, rhetoric and hyperbole.

I should add that you did exactly the same thing under your previous account Tall man. Probably under others as well.

You were shown to be a transphobic bigot then and the same is happening now.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

Lol you're blatantly lying. Anyone reading this thread can see that

 

[emileh]

Lol you're blatantly lying. Anyone reading this thread can see that

I gave you answers repeatedly. Based on the science. I also gave you reasons that the answers were the way they were.

Those answers are in the two threads that you've been spamming with your transphobia. Anyone that can be bothered can go back through them and see my responses for themselves.

I cited a published, peer reviewed scientific paper that gave a good explanation based on biological science. You didn't and won't read it. Probably because it'll tell you that your dearly held transphobic opinions are worthless.

Unlike you, if you'd produced properly peer reviewed papers to support your claims, I'd be willing to read them, understand them and be persuaded to change my mind if they held up to scrutiny.

That's science. What you use is pseudoscience, rhetoric and hyperbole.

I should add that you did exactly the same thing under your previous account Tall man. Probably under others as well.

You were shown to be a transphobic bigot then and the same is happening now.

 

[Deleted member 308590]

Keep making a fool of yourself 👍

I think a more pertinent question about trans people is, should trans women be allowed in women's spaces, changing areas, breastfeeding classes, prisons, sports etc

In Texas last week a transgender 'Jammie Booker' won the world's strongest woman competition, he's a man. Glamour magazine gave 9 trans women activists the 'woman of the year' award, They're men. A black lesbian 'Tish Hyman' got kicked out of golds gym in L.a because she complained about a trans woman staring at her while she was naked in the shower.

All of that happened within a few weeks. It's illegal for a man to stand outside at a window and watch women undress but he can go INTO a women's changing area and do that if he SAYS he's a woman.

In Australia a trans woman broke a women's leg in soccer, her sporting career ended, women got took to court, fined thousands for SAYING what they're DOING.

The left call it inclusion.

That's just a few incidents there's many more.

The trans woman who Tish Hyman was complaining about is Alexis Black, convicted wife beater, he pleaded guilty to domestic assault 'among other convictions' and got jailed for it, broke his ex wife's jaw. He also took his ex wife's name.

Did you offer any counter arguments? ^^^ NO

 

[Deleted member 308590]

All people need to do is scroll up in this thread where I QUOTED my posts and QUOTED your posts in REPLY. and what did you reply? You said bigoted agenda, hatred, mindless bigotry etc etc repeatedly lol idiot.