Does a persons clothing show what type of character they are?

Bread.

Gold Member
Good evening,

First and fore most id like to start of by saying there is actually two debates going on here. For the purpose of not cluttering chat avenue i will just discuss them both here since theyre relevant.

1. Whether a woman(or man) should listen/respect to her significant others opinion about her choice of clothing.
2. Whether a woman(or man)s clothing shows what type of character they are

Today we were having a discussion in general chat regarding if women should have an "obligation" to respect their partners opinion in regards to their clothing choice. The discussion moved towards modest vs immodest clothing then a pretentious woman said that a persons character can not be defined by their clothing.
uIjZi7a.png


I for one belive that a persons choice to dress modestly often reflects their character. Their choice of clothing can showcase values such as self-respect and humility. It can also indicate a persons commitment to cultural or religious values, which often emphasize modesty as a virtue. Therefore, modest clothing can be a reliable indicator of an individual's character and principles.

When it comes to a woman (whom she has a committed relationship with) i believe it is absolutely critical to respect her partners opinion. As is the same for a man. Certainly a man does not "own" a woman and can then command her in what to wear. But a man can certainly tell a woman if he disagrees with the choice of her outfit and ask her to "cover up". After all a committed relationship means commitment and respect to your partner. If you arent going to respect your partner and just feel like you can do whatever you want with no objection, then why be in a give and take relationship?
 
@Apollo @H.R. PufnStuf ink and emileh are violating rule 1 and 2 of debate thread.
Part of a debate is having open and frank discussions.

If the debate isn’t genuine (ie. If it’s a position statement framed as a debate) then that’s a perfectly reasonable thing to bring into the “debate”.

This is Emileh’s view
This isn't a debate. It's just your misogynistic trolling again. Grow up.
And I agree wholeheartedly.

You are of course free to counter that but the first post in the thread confirms it’s not a debate. It’s your mouldy ramblings as per usual and at some point some people around here will wake up and dump your fake “debates” where they belong.
 
@H.R. PufnStuf

Personal insults of other members will not be tolerated.

If you wish for other people to respect your points of view, then you must also respect theirs. Remember, we debate issues here, not individuals. If you cannot present your position on an issue without resorting to insults, then there's a good chance that your position is not very strong to begin with.



Stick to the subject.

This is not a chat forum
, and threads are periodically pruned to eliminate "spam." If your post does not contribute to the topic in any way, it will be deleted. If you wish to carry on a friendly conversation with another member, please do so using Private Messages.
 
The subject is not a debate. It's another one of your agenda driven trolling threads that also happens to be misogynistic. One of these days you'll learn what a debate really is although I won't hold my breath on that.

Your "arguments" are immature and offensive to those you target.
 
Top