I'm for the motion, because they can always get their education elsewhere, like you said. e.g. They can get home schooled, which is a much better alternative cause they can take care of their baby while studying, etc. In most cases, the ones who fall pregnant, are the ones who are wild/loose and they party all day. So if we let them continue with school, chances are that they will fall pregnant again. Then the school and everyone else would have to deal with the problems.AжзMann;1912977 said:I'm for it.
Though I wouldn't like to label it 'expulsion.' A more softer and understanding term perhaps? I think it's a wise move not for any other reason then the safety of the baby. There are a lot of irresponsible people in schools and accidents happen. Nothing prohibits her from furthering her education later on in life anyway. Many people do.
You're right. It's her decision to get laid. It's her decision to screw around, not use protection, and get pregnant. Therefore, she should suffer the consequences.It should be her decision. What if it happens a few months before the end of year?
And I can think of worse things that people should be expelled for but aren't.
😵 I think you've missed the point of this debate Luka.Why should they be expelled from a place, which gives crap or no sex education?
They can still get an education outside of school. I'm sure there are institutions ******* ppl can go and learn and still get their certificate. And there's also home-schools.i dont think they should b expelled from school wat would that achieve they lose there education just cause there pregnant thats just stupid we dont get sacked from our jobs if we get pregnant wats the diff u cant stop young girls gettin pregnant theres nothin u can do about it only educate and takin them out of school would only make matters worse
In cases of r word, the victims can take morning after pills. So they won't be pregnant in any case. If they are, then it's probably a date r.a.p.e or something, which at the end of day, is still partially her fault.Aâ®Õn™;1913015 said:I'm agenst that, because I've seen people that have been pregnant at 14, 15 and 16, and it wosn't there choice because of evil people.
My brothers g/f was pregnant at 15 and was forced out of school. I think it's unfair because she was raped.
😵 I think you've missed the point of this debate Luka.
WHAT A FUCKING IRRESPONSIBLE AND IDIOTIC THING TO SAY!!!If they are, then it's probably a date r.a.p.e or something, which at the end of day, is still partially her fault.
AжзMann;1913135 said:I think some people are seriously missing the point here. I'd like to say that pregnancy is just a natural part of life but who can say its morally responsible for someone so young to take up what should be left to mature adults? Granted there are some spectacular young mothers but if they make the conscious decision to take it upon themselves to get pregnant then they should reap the consequences of there actions.
Expelling pregnant girls from school is a ridiculous notion. Just because they are young and pregnant, why should they be denied an education which might be the very thing that they need to support themselves and their child?
Also, this would lead to a girl having to choose either an abortion or her education- NOT ON.
Everyone has a right to an education. Whilst these girls are very young, a baby is a life, not a disease or a crime.
You're saying that if a girl is pregnant then she should be expelled, which shows young ones that they shouldn't sleep around and all that, well if you are expelling the girl for sleeping around then the father of the child should be expelled too when possible, if they are in the same school like. Because otherwise the boys will still be carrying on as they do and the girls will be getting punnished for it in more ways than one.
What you said about r.ape victims is absolutely dicussting how the hell can you say something like? So some poor innocent girl of 14 walking home from school who gets abducted and all that was asking for it? YOU have a messed up mind if that is what you believe.
The education system shouldn't just abandon these girls by kicking them out, alright so it might be easier/safer if they weren't around a million other students in case of accidents, then someone should set up a programme which would basically be a centre where the girls could be taught in a 'safer environment' if you will.
Kids who are expelled in England aren't dropped totally, they useually have the option of going to a centre thing where they can carry on the basics of their education, girls who fall pregnant should have the same option.
SO there you go... :dontknow:
AжзMann;1913319 said:There has already been alternatives suggested which pretty much invalidates this statement.
Thats a very narrow minded and negligible statement CONSIDERING there is alternatives suggested.
I agree that everyone has the right to an education and I agree that baby's are not a disease but in fact a life but your general logic on this isn't rational. It appears you're not thinking about the baby's life and the potential for it to die before it even has a chance to live or the school who could be potentially liable in the event of an infant death.
Thats also not to mention the trauma the girl might go through in the event of her losing her own baby.
I get what your sayin, but what we also have to remember is that not too long ago most girls were married off by the time they were like 16 and had children. When and how did this change come about? I dunno...........
I jus think it's all slightly madness. These girls are being punnished enough without being taken away from their friends and what they've known for all of their lives. Think how scared you must be when you find out you're pregnant, you have to tell your parents/family/friends. People look at you on the street so disapprovingly. Some girls are rejected by their families, they hav eto live on their own. They worry about money and being able to cope and all of that. They don't need what is supposed to be a support net, torn from under them.
Enough said. Shouldn't be talking about things that we personally don'tn know about. Get a teenage mother here to tell you what it's like and what she thinks then start heving your debate innit, thats the right way.
Laters!
Home-schooled by who? The single mother who works two jobs to make ends meet because she was never able to finish school as a result of being kicked out for getting pregnant?Fearless Virgin said:They can get home schooled, which is a much better alternative cause they can take care of their baby while studying, etc.
This makes no sense to me. The baby could die because the pregnant mother is sitting at a desk instead of on a couch? Walking down a school hallway instead of her hallway at home? Riding a school bus instead of a public one? Help me understand the reasoning here. We're talking about education, not trying out for the school basketball team. :dontknow:AжзMann;1913319 said:I agree that everyone has the right to an education and I agree that baby's are not a disease but in fact a life but your general logic on this isn't rational. It appears you're not thinking about the baby's life and the potential for it to die before it even has a chance to live or the school who could be potentially liable in the event of an infant death.
Thats also not to mention the trauma the girl might go through in the event of her losing her own baby.