Is sexuality a suitable subject for children?

[Deleted member 292068]

Simply being Christian gets you called extremist because the bible openly speaks against what the left are preaching about. You clearly haven't been paying attention.

No, twisting the word of the Bible and taking everything literally while believing every story in it so you can demonize people is extremism.

 

[Soapie]

...well I got the talk when I was like 11 or 12 in primary school, and I seem to be fine.

So not that big of an issue

 

[Deleted member 303751]

Let's look at those one at a time.

1. This is an area that needs to catch up with society. I can understand why a male officer would be asked to search a suspect that is not biologically female and had not transitioned. That makes sense. The same would go for suspects that are not biologically male and that have not transitioned being searched by female officers.

2. The drag show for children was a pretty harmless event. It was held in a bar apparently and the sign (a neon fixture, not a portable sign) is part of the bar's decor. I'd agree that it would probably have been sensible for the bar's owners or management to cover it up or even switch it off but they didn't and I doubt the kids would have been bothered by it. The actual show itself was pretty harmless and more centred on the kids having fun which they clearly did. This is cherry picked. It's one out of many drag events where kids were involved and there were no problems. It was also held in Texas a very religiously conservative state...

3. The library didn't hire a performer in that costume. They hired a carnival arts company called Mandinga Arts who advertise themselves saying “guaranteed fun for family audiences” They stopped the performance as soon as they realised the costume was inappropriate. So you can't blame the library for that one. In fact since that event Mandinga Arts have stated they have used the character at mixed audience events, but realized it was “undoubtedly inappropriate for a children’s event.” They have retired the costume. So the carnival arts company messed up hugely, were stopped performing by the library as soon as they started. Cherry picked again.

4. Apparently a group of naked cyclists appeared during a pride event. They weren't arrested because Seattle has no nudity laws and it's legal to be nude anywhere in the city. Take that one up with Seattle but if I'd have been there when I was younger I'd probably have been too busy laughing to be outraged. They weren't being sexual, just being naked. Inappropriate? Yes probably for a public place but Seattle's laws...

5. Meh so what? As long as they do a good job championing women's rights for the UN who actually cares?

6. LMAO are you really complaining about a few rainbows on police cars? You do realise it's intended to help forge trust between the LGBT community and the police? How can that even be a bad thing. Police cars in Scotland have Gaelic on them OMG GAELIC shock horror gasp.

7. Again so what. Beauty contests are an anachronism that should disappear anyway. You really are reaching hard for things to whine about aren't you?

8. See 7.

9. So what? As long as they deserved the award good for them.

10. We covered this in the thread you made. It needs the supervising bodies to catch up with the 2020s and ensure that there's a level playing field. Boxing is also an anachronism...

11. I'll let AP news deal with this one: Source

"CLAIM: A proposed California bill would allow school mental health professionals to remove minors from the custody of their parents or guardians who don’t consent to the child receiving gender-affirming surgeries.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The legislation, AB 665, would amend an existing law that allows minors 12 and older to receive mental health counseling or therapy without parental consent. Currently, the law applies only to youth covered by private health insurance. It contains no language that would allow school mental health professionals to remove children from the custody of their parents or guardians. The bill does not authorize any gender-affirming surgeries without parental consent.

THE FACTS: A social media post is misrepresenting a California bill that aims to expand access to mental health services on an outpatient basis for youth between the ages of 12 and 17. Opponents of the bill claim that, if passed, it would allow mental health professionals to remove a minor from their parents’ custody or “provide ‘gender affirming’ surgery to children without parental consent.”

“If the bill becomes law; children who wish to seek ‘gender affirming’ surgery who have parents that will not permit such mutilations, will be able to be removed from the custody of their parents,” reads the post on Instagram sharing the false claim."

12. I'll let AFP Fact Check deal with this one: Source

"Since Bill C-16, an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act, became a law in 2017, several online media have spread the idea that Canadians could be jailed or fined simply for using an incorrect gender pronoun. While the aim of the law is to add "gender identity and gender expression" to the list of illegal grounds for discrimination, Bill C-16 cannot force anyone to use a specific pronoun. No Canadian has been jailed or fined for using the wrong gender pronoun.

One article published online shortly after Bill C-16 was approved by the Senate on June 14, 2017, claimed that it was now illegal to use the wrong gender pronoun in Canada. The article continues to circulate on social media, and was shared more than 10,000 times through multiple Facebook posts as of June 22, 2018.

Bill C-16 is an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act and to the Criminal Code that includes "gender identity and gender expressions" in matters of discrimination. A word scan of the document shows no specific mention of gender pronouns in the bill."

13. You can't count. Or did the hate filled spittle you sprayed all over your monitor trick you into misnumbering?

14. You don't check your sources for credibility. This is called cherry picking lol

1. You should learn to read my comments correctly I wasn't talking about how people in custody identify I was talking about male police officers who identify as women are now able to strip search women, By that I mean REAL women adult human females the ones with wombs and xx chromosomes. It used to be only female police officers who were allowed to strip search women in custody for their dignity and now its male police officers who IDENTIFY as women can do that. Do you understand? 2. It's not a 'pretty harmless event' it's sexualising children it's exposing them to something they don't need to be exposed to. The sign in pink letters which clearly says 'it's not gonna lick itself' was not covered up, were the people who organised it incapable of reading? of course not they knew exactly what they were doing and that's sexualising children. At another drag queen 'show' for children the kids were throwing fake dollar bills at the drag queens while they danced sexually provocatively in front of them.Why are kids not allowed in strip clubs? because it's a sexually charged environment it's for adults only and drag queen shows should also be for adults only, even some drag queens have spoken out against it and said children should not be there. 3. Yes it was an lgbt company who advertised as 'guaranteed for family audiances' then they have a 'rainbow d ildo butt monkey' a man in rainbow colours with his a ss exposed and a d ildo between his legs at a reading event for children yeah it's so 'inclusive' it's depravity and perversion being forced onto children under the guise of equality, inclusion, acceptance. I don't blame the library I blame mandiga arts. How do you you know they stopped the performance as soon as they realised the costume was inappropriate? and even IF they did children should not be exposed to that. 4.Really? so if it was straight people any other time naked on the streets in front of children the police would do nothing? It's not about you just because you have no problem with adults naked on the streets in front of children doesn't mean the children don't have a problem with it. 5. Women care because now we have 'trans women' I.e MEN taking positions of power for roles that were meant for women it's an insult to them. The obsession with equality and inclusion has usurped womens rights, the rights and feelings of trans people are now more important than the rights and feelings of women it's all about the former. 6. I don't know why you think it's funny, the police are supposed to be impartial, neutral. Imagine if a gay man and a straight man are having an argument/ fight and the police show up in a rainbow coloured police car it's not being neutral is it. All institutions have now been ideologically captured the education system, big tech companies, corporations. big pharma companies, media and now the police. .

 

[emileh]

And again you're completely wrong. Read the actual guidelines.

You're cherry picking the news you want to see to support your obvious transphobia. Check your sources. I did and all of yours were wrong. I've given my sources, all reputable I might add.

Some advice. Use paragraphs. Your angry spittle flecked wall of text posts are going to get a lot of TL😀R responses.

Also, buy shares in Bacofoil.

 

[Deleted member 303751]

Let's look at those one at a time.

1. This is an area that needs to catch up with society. I can understand why a male officer would be asked to search a suspect that is not biologically female and had not transitioned. That makes sense. The same would go for suspects that are not biologically male and that have not transitioned being searched by female officers.

2. The drag show for children was a pretty harmless event. It was held in a bar apparently and the sign (a neon fixture, not a portable sign) is part of the bar's decor. I'd agree that it would probably have been sensible for the bar's owners or management to cover it up or even switch it off but they didn't and I doubt the kids would have been bothered by it. The actual show itself was pretty harmless and more centred on the kids having fun which they clearly did. This is cherry picked. It's one out of many drag events where kids were involved and there were no problems. It was also held in Texas a very religiously conservative state...

3. The library didn't hire a performer in that costume. They hired a carnival arts company called Mandinga Arts who advertise themselves saying “guaranteed fun for family audiences” They stopped the performance as soon as they realised the costume was inappropriate. So you can't blame the library for that one. In fact since that event Mandinga Arts have stated they have used the character at mixed audience events, but realized it was “undoubtedly inappropriate for a children’s event.” They have retired the costume. So the carnival arts company messed up hugely, were stopped performing by the library as soon as they started. Cherry picked again.

4. Apparently a group of naked cyclists appeared during a pride event. They weren't arrested because Seattle has no nudity laws and it's legal to be nude anywhere in the city. Take that one up with Seattle but if I'd have been there when I was younger I'd probably have been too busy laughing to be outraged. They weren't being sexual, just being naked. Inappropriate? Yes probably for a public place but Seattle's laws...

5. Meh so what? As long as they do a good job championing women's rights for the UN who actually cares?

6. LMAO are you really complaining about a few rainbows on police cars? You do realise it's intended to help forge trust between the LGBT community and the police? How can that even be a bad thing. Police cars in Scotland have Gaelic on them OMG GAELIC shock horror gasp.

7. Again so what. Beauty contests are an anachronism that should disappear anyway. You really are reaching hard for things to whine about aren't you?

8. See 7.

9. So what? As long as they deserved the award good for them.

10. We covered this in the thread you made. It needs the supervising bodies to catch up with the 2020s and ensure that there's a level playing field. Boxing is also an anachronism...

11. I'll let AP news deal with this one: Source

"CLAIM: A proposed California bill would allow school mental health professionals to remove minors from the custody of their parents or guardians who don’t consent to the child receiving gender-affirming surgeries.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The legislation, AB 665, would amend an existing law that allows minors 12 and older to receive mental health counseling or therapy without parental consent. Currently, the law applies only to youth covered by private health insurance. It contains no language that would allow school mental health professionals to remove children from the custody of their parents or guardians. The bill does not authorize any gender-affirming surgeries without parental consent.

THE FACTS: A social media post is misrepresenting a California bill that aims to expand access to mental health services on an outpatient basis for youth between the ages of 12 and 17. Opponents of the bill claim that, if passed, it would allow mental health professionals to remove a minor from their parents’ custody or “provide ‘gender affirming’ surgery to children without parental consent.”

“If the bill becomes law; children who wish to seek ‘gender affirming’ surgery who have parents that will not permit such mutilations, will be able to be removed from the custody of their parents,” reads the post on Instagram sharing the false claim."

12. I'll let AFP Fact Check deal with this one: Source

"Since Bill C-16, an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act, became a law in 2017, several online media have spread the idea that Canadians could be jailed or fined simply for using an incorrect gender pronoun. While the aim of the law is to add "gender identity and gender expression" to the list of illegal grounds for discrimination, Bill C-16 cannot force anyone to use a specific pronoun. No Canadian has been jailed or fined for using the wrong gender pronoun.

One article published online shortly after Bill C-16 was approved by the Senate on June 14, 2017, claimed that it was now illegal to use the wrong gender pronoun in Canada. The article continues to circulate on social media, and was shared more than 10,000 times through multiple Facebook posts as of June 22, 2018.

Bill C-16 is an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act and to the Criminal Code that includes "gender identity and gender expressions" in matters of discrimination. A word scan of the document shows no specific mention of gender pronouns in the bill."

13. You can't count. Or did the hate filled spittle you sprayed all over your monitor trick you into misnumbering?

14. You don't check your sources for credibility. This is called cherry picking lol

7.Men should not be winning female beauty contests that are for women it's an insult to women 8. See 7. 9. To reiterate men should not be winning awards that are for women. If it was white people winning awards that are for black people or if it was straight people winning awards that are for gay people you would be outraged 10.You did not cover this in the thread I made it took you a long time to even answer and when you finally did you basically just said I was 'promoting an agenda' 11. AP news lol 12. Tell that to the father arrested in canada for not using his daughters pronouns you're giving citations from 7 years ago laws change and are updated 13. 'Hate filled spittle' lol that's a good one you should learn what hate actually means it's an emotion, define hate in one word = emotion and you don't have a magical ability to determine how I'm feeling but I'm feeling imperturbable, did being brainwashed by gender ideology trick you into denying reality. Do you have blue or pink hair? You're alethophobic you have a fear of truth and you deny basic biological facts this is called insanity

 

[rapinoes smirking revenge]

he wasn't arrested for simply using the wrong pronouns. it was for disobeying a court order and contempt of court. he was barred from speaking about his child and the situation in interviews and publications. and he continued to give interviews where he publicly gave out his child's information and medical records. THAT is what he was arrested for. not pronouns.

 

[Deleted member 303751]

he wasn't arrested for simply using the wrong pronouns. it was for disobeying a court order and contempt of court. he was barred from speaking about his child and the situation in interviews and publications. and he continued to give interviews where he publicly gave out his child's information and medical records. THAT is what he was arrested for. not pronouns.

In essence it was because he wouldn't use her pronouns, the court order was as a result of that

 

[Deleted member 303751]

Feel free to comment on what I said with questions 1 - 13 if you want ^^

 

[emileh]

he wasn't arrested for simply using the wrong pronouns. it was for disobeying a court order and contempt of court. he was barred from speaking about his child and the situation in interviews and publications. and he continued to give interviews where he publicly gave out his child's information and medical records. THAT is what he was arrested for. not pronouns.

Yes but but but AGENDA...

 

[Inkandtatts]

Yes but but but AGENDA...

Careful. That will be interpreted as “a gender”

 

[emileh]

7.Men should not be winning female beauty contests that are for women it's an insult to women 8. See 7. 9. To reiterate men should not be winning awards that are for women. If it was white people winning awards that are for black people or if it was straight people winning awards that are for gay people you would be outraged 10.You did not cover this in the thread I made it took you a long time to even answer and when you finally did you basically just said I was 'promoting an agenda' 11. AP news lol 12. Tell that to the father arrested in canada for not using his daughters pronouns you're giving citations from 7 years ago laws change and are updated 13. 'Hate filled spittle' lol that's a good one you should learn what hate actually means it's an emotion, define hate in one word = emotion and you don't have a magical ability to determine how I'm feeling but I'm feeling imperturbable, did being brainwashed by gender ideology trick you into denying reality. Do you have blue or pink hair? You're alethophobic you have a fear of truth and you deny basic biological facts this is called insanity

Oh really? I'm the one that fact checks statments against reliable sources and I'm frightened of the truth??? I must be a nervous wreck by now.

Let's face it. You like pushing extremist bigoted agendas either because you're an extremist bigot, or because you like to troll and are hoping to cause an argument. I could never decide which one the yeasted one was...

 

[BlackLivesMatter]

It is common practice now to ask new clients the gender they identify as and which pronouns they use.
I never knew there were so many different types of genders.
What I like now about my wife's native language , and it bugged me at first is they do not use pronouns. It turns out it is easier that way.

 

[Deleted member 303751]

emileh you equate conveying facts and having a differing opinion with 'pushing an extremist agenda'. You equate truth with hate because you hate truth also it's not only me you accuse of being that guy bread you accused JosephTheMainMan of being him too, In your head do you think that two different people can be the same person or do you just accuse multiple people of being someone they are clearly not? Cue more 'agenda' and 'bigotry' comments...

 

[emileh]

emileh you equate conveying facts and having a differing opinion with 'pushing an extremist agenda'. You equate truth with hate because you hate truth also it's not only me you accuse of being that guy bread you accused JosephTheMainMan of being him too, In your head do you think that two different people can be the same person or do you just accuse multiple people of being someone they are clearly not? Cue more 'agenda' and 'bigotry' comments...

Josephtheweiner isn't bread. You certainly act like bread and use much the same style.

Other than that, you've just posted a lot of assumed nonsense. I like the truth and I always check facts. It's fairly obvious that you like any version of a story, factual or not, as long as it supports your world view and it's equally obvious that you don't fact check as my refutation of your ranty long post shows.

 

[Deleted member 303751]

There was no refutation and you're just regurgitating the same nonsense. You say Joseph is not bread then why did you say in other posts that he is. When you are capable of having a rational discussion and hearing other points of view instead of just the one narrative you have been fed I will start to take you seriously. Enjoy your weekend 👋

 

[emileh]

There was no refutation and you're just regurgitating the same nonsense. You say Joseph is not bread then why did you say in other posts that he is. When you are capable of having a rational discussion and hearing other points of view instead of just the one narrative you have been fed I will start to take you seriously. Enjoy your weekend 👋

No refutation eh?

So that huge carefully fact checked repsonse I gave (quoted below) wasn't a blow by blow refutation of your poorly researched and clearly not fact checked claims? Interesting...

Let's look at those one at a time.

1. This is an area that needs to catch up with society. I can understand why a male officer would be asked to search a suspect that is not biologically female and had not transitioned. That makes sense. The same would go for suspects that are not biologically male and that have not transitioned being searched by female officers.

2. The drag show for children was a pretty harmless event. It was held in a bar apparently and the sign (a neon fixture, not a portable sign) is part of the bar's decor. I'd agree that it would probably have been sensible for the bar's owners or management to cover it up or even switch it off but they didn't and I doubt the kids would have been bothered by it. The actual show itself was pretty harmless and more centred on the kids having fun which they clearly did. This is cherry picked. It's one out of many drag events where kids were involved and there were no problems. It was also held in Texas a very religiously conservative state...

3. The library didn't hire a performer in that costume. They hired a carnival arts company called Mandinga Arts who advertise themselves saying “guaranteed fun for family audiences” They stopped the performance as soon as they realised the costume was inappropriate. So you can't blame the library for that one. In fact since that event Mandinga Arts have stated they have used the character at mixed audience events, but realized it was “undoubtedly inappropriate for a children’s event.” They have retired the costume. So the carnival arts company messed up hugely, were stopped performing by the library as soon as they started. Cherry picked again.

4. Apparently a group of naked cyclists appeared during a pride event. They weren't arrested because Seattle has no nudity laws and it's legal to be nude anywhere in the city. Take that one up with Seattle but if I'd have been there when I was younger I'd probably have been too busy laughing to be outraged. They weren't being sexual, just being naked. Inappropriate? Yes probably for a public place but Seattle's laws...

5. Meh so what? As long as they do a good job championing women's rights for the UN who actually cares?

6. LMAO are you really complaining about a few rainbows on police cars? You do realise it's intended to help forge trust between the LGBT community and the police? How can that even be a bad thing. Police cars in Scotland have Gaelic on them OMG GAELIC shock horror gasp.

7. Again so what. Beauty contests are an anachronism that should disappear anyway. You really are reaching hard for things to whine about aren't you?

8. See 7.

9. So what? As long as they deserved the award good for them.

10. We covered this in the thread you made. It needs the supervising bodies to catch up with the 2020s and ensure that there's a level playing field. Boxing is also an anachronism...

11. I'll let AP news deal with this one: Source

"CLAIM: A proposed California bill would allow school mental health professionals to remove minors from the custody of their parents or guardians who don’t consent to the child receiving gender-affirming surgeries.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The legislation, AB 665, would amend an existing law that allows minors 12 and older to receive mental health counseling or therapy without parental consent. Currently, the law applies only to youth covered by private health insurance. It contains no language that would allow school mental health professionals to remove children from the custody of their parents or guardians. The bill does not authorize any gender-affirming surgeries without parental consent.

THE FACTS: A social media post is misrepresenting a California bill that aims to expand access to mental health services on an outpatient basis for youth between the ages of 12 and 17. Opponents of the bill claim that, if passed, it would allow mental health professionals to remove a minor from their parents’ custody or “provide ‘gender affirming’ surgery to children without parental consent.”

“If the bill becomes law; children who wish to seek ‘gender affirming’ surgery who have parents that will not permit such mutilations, will be able to be removed from the custody of their parents,” reads the post on Instagram sharing the false claim."

12. I'll let AFP Fact Check deal with this one: Source

"Since Bill C-16, an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act, became a law in 2017, several online media have spread the idea that Canadians could be jailed or fined simply for using an incorrect gender pronoun. While the aim of the law is to add "gender identity and gender expression" to the list of illegal grounds for discrimination, Bill C-16 cannot force anyone to use a specific pronoun. No Canadian has been jailed or fined for using the wrong gender pronoun.

One article published online shortly after Bill C-16 was approved by the Senate on June 14, 2017, claimed that it was now illegal to use the wrong gender pronoun in Canada. The article continues to circulate on social media, and was shared more than 10,000 times through multiple Facebook posts as of June 22, 2018.

Bill C-16 is an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act and to the Criminal Code that includes "gender identity and gender expressions" in matters of discrimination. A word scan of the document shows no specific mention of gender pronouns in the bill."

13. You can't count. Or did the hate filled spittle you sprayed all over your monitor trick you into misnumbering?

14. You don't check your sources for credibility. This is called cherry picking lol

Nope, that looks like a carefully fact checked point by point refutation of your claims. Oh, complete with citations where they're needed.

Continually resorting to Trumpian tactics of repeating falsehoods isn't a good idea, just saying... Mind you, it's what the yeasted one would do.

 

[JosephTheMainMan]

I'm not sure that's a fair statement to make. The link to extremism is based on people using religion to support their views when the religion is largely a belief in itself.

Eg. (I'm going to use a non-extreme point):
"You shouldn't use God's name in vain because: Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain" is fine for Christians but has no impact on non-Christians because they can say "God almighty, this place is insane lately" without breaking any religious codes/rules etc.

Saying "Gays should be executed because God said so", is where you start throwing religion and extremism into it. In your belief system that's fine but having a debate/discussion with anyone who doesn't believe (or who interprets the bible differently) is then opening you up to allegations of religious extremism.

No one says that gays should be executed except for mostly Islamic people. I haven't seen Christians do that stuff and go around attacking people.

Christians believe that homosexuality shouldn't be approved or condoned as it is an abomination in the eyes of God - that isn't extremist that's just basic bible...

 

[Inkandtatts]

No one says that gays should be executed except for mostly Islamic people. I haven't seen Christians do that stuff and go around attacking people.

Christians believe that homosexuality shouldn't be approved or condoned as it is an abomination in the eyes of God - that isn't extremist that's just basic bible...

I think you missed the point I was making. The specifics were just examples to explain this:

I'm not sure that's a fair statement to make. The link to extremism is based on people using religion to support their views when the religion is largely a belief in itself.

While you’re on the subject of this though:

Christians believe that homosexuality shouldn't be approved or condoned as it is an abomination in the eyes of God - that isn't extremist that's just basic bible..

I’ll pass that on to my local vicar who I’ll probably bump into tomorrow. He flies the Pride flag outside his Church and I believe he’s a greater authority on Christian belief than your basic bible

 

[emileh]

No one says that gays should be executed except for mostly Islamic people. I haven't seen Christians do that stuff and go around attacking people.

Christians believe that homosexuality shouldn't be approved or condoned as it is an abomination in the eyes of God - that isn't extremist that's just basic bible...

Aye right.

Pastor Says 'Solution' to Gay People Is Executions: It's in the Bible

In his Sunday sermon, Pastor Dillon Awes of the Stedfast Baptist Church said that all gay people in America should be "lined up" and executed.

www.newsweek.com

Texas pastor says gay people should be 'shot in the back of the head' in shocking sermon

Pastor Dillon Awes of Stedfast Baptist Church in Watauga said gay people "are dangerous to society” and “all homosexuals are pedophiles.”

www.nbcnews.com

US church pastor and detective says LGBT people should be killed

Cleric, who is also a police officer, says gay people should be rounded up and put to death

www.independent.co.uk

Controversial Ariz. Pastor Sparks Anger by Saying 'Gays Should Be Executed'

A 31-year-old electrician, father of seven and pastor from Tempe, Ariz , who once wished President Barack Obama would die of brain cancer like Ted Kennedy, came under fire from Irish citizens last

www.christianpost.com

Pastor says gays should be put to death – Baptist News Global

By Bob Allen A Baptist pastor in Kansas is taking heat for suggesting the government should execute homosexuals in an audio clip from his Sunday sermon making the rounds on the Internet. Curtis Knapp, pastor of New Hope Baptist Church...

baptistnews.com

MSN

Manny Pacquiao posts Bible verse that states gay people should be killed

Manny Pacquiao is not backing down from his stance against homosexuality.

www.latimes.com

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/salvation-army-official-gays-deserve-death/321193/

Texas Pastor Calls for Gay People to Be Shot in the Head

<p>It's not the first time a preacher from the Stedfast Baptist Church has made the news over calls of violence against LGBTQ+ people.</p>

www.advocate.com

Tennessee Deputy, Pastor Calls For Execution Of LGBTQ People

"Have a trial for them, and if they are convicted then they are to be put to death," detective and pastor Grayson Fritts said during a sermon.

www.huffpost.com

CPAC Speaker Calls for Eradication of 'Transgenderism' -- and Somehow Claims He's Not Calling for Elimination of Transgender People

“For the good of society... transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely,” Daily Wire's Michael Knowles told the CPAC audience.

www.rollingstone.com

One search page...

 

[JosephTheMainMan]

I think you missed the point I was making. The specifics were just examples to explain this:


While you’re on the subject of this though:

I’ll pass that on to my local vicar who I’ll probably bump into tomorrow. He flies the Pride flag outside his Church and I believe he’s a greater authority on Christian belief than your basic bible

Of course your favourite version of Christianity is the one that's been corrupted. No surprise there. Pass on my message to whoever you want.