Should Reaction Bombing Be An Offense?

[StubleU]

^^^^^ (and it's already covered in CM forum rules.)

let's see

Questionable content - Some content issues are left to the discretion of the individual moderators, but may include any material that is knowingly false and/or defamatory, misleading, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, ***ually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, that otherwise violates any law, or that encourages conduct constituting a criminal offense.

it's none of the above...because it's a reaction

Flaming, Bashing, and Trolling - Hate posts and personal attacks will not be tolerated on the Forums, as is posting topics specifically to provoke a negative response from someone (AKA trolling).

none of those because...it's a reaction

Spam - Purposely spamming a message board with senseless, vacuous, or empty messages is highly frowned upon, unless posting in Everything else forums where spam is allowed .

none of those...because it's not a post...it's a reaction

Flashing GIFs are not, under no cir***stances, to be used in signatures or posts. This can be dangerous to some users with Photo Sensitive Epilepsy and can cause serious harm.

as annoying as those are...it's not that...cause it's a reaction

remind me again where in the forum rule cm states that reaction bombing is an offense?

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

Could easily be seen as trolling, and or spam or harrassing

 

[StubleU]

But it's not explicitly stated... And as we've seen, you take your own liberties at punishing based on your own personal vendetta biases.

Also, I thought you weren't going to be invisible anymore


But I digress... Let's get on track again.

 

[Boba Fett]

Its already "warnable" Really.... now you are wanting to engage with users but denying them the ability to express themselves back.


Looks like you've gone from not only wanting opinions you don't like banned- to now wanting faces you don't like banned?


(b4 claims of favoritism, ofc its annoying, but if the bar gets lowered to outlawing "being annoying" who would be left? )

Her digging up threads that are old to react to knowing full well the user has it on ignore and I'd doing it to bypass ignore is nothing like what..whatever you just tried gas lighting us with. A "reaction" would be, her replying to the post, despite having them on ignore and 99.9% of the time, she's doing this because she simply doesn't like someone criticizing you, pedophiles, people who are calling out users sexual harassment, Bible Thumping, etc. She literally did this earlier for me pointing out Revo admitting to being on the sex offender registry.


Go back to sleep because you slept walked through this one.

 

[StubleU]

In b4 @TheDifference comes in with some defense of hr

 

[Boba Fett]

it wouldn't be a report...you can't report reactions...stupid...it'd be a screenshot pm to the UMs that care about it's users and their experience...with all of them...so one...but that might be too much for you to lift a finger aobut...so...

He's been made aware of this and is once again, the only one twisting things to prevent one of the few users who like him from being reprimanded because he'll be down to one user left that agrees with everything he does and says.

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

But it's not explicitly stated... And as we've seen, you take your own liberties at punishing based on your own personal vendetta biases.

Also, I thought you weren't going to be invisible anymore


But I digress... Let's get on track again.

it doesn't have to be- the word discretion says it all.

 

[StubleU]

He's been made aware of this and is once again, the only one twisting things to prevent one of the few users who like him from being reprimanded because he'll be down to one user left that agrees with everything he does and says.

And this is why he needs to be fired. He's the boomer manager that wants everyone to work in the open concept office and micromanages everyone.

 

[StubleU]

it doesn't have to be- the word discretion says it all.

Let's face it.. You abuse your role. Bold. Fact.

 

[H.R. PufnStuf]

Let's face it.. You abuse your role. Bold. Fact.

since jt always comes down to a collateral attack- enjoy the last word.

 

[StubleU]

It's not an attack. It's a fact. Have you not been crying in the corner for the last five days of posts bringing up the issues with you?

 

[Boba Fett]

And this is why he needs to be fired. He's the boomer manager that wants everyone to work in the open concept office and micromanages everyone.

I'm no longer shocked by this. It's not him having a grasp on what's going on, he knows but has poor gas lighting skills. His excuse is like telling someone it's their fault for being spammed because they responded to someone harassing them. Actually, he does that with the spammer who he bought VIP for. He's let him attack users and can't get rid of him so he'd mute anyone replying to the spammer and engaging him while letting him go at random people telling users to just ignore him. He eventually unbans him because he can't get control of him and thinks bargaining with him will get him to stop.

 

[Soapie]

"Mods an admins can't ignore users"

...whoops, I've had the person who this thread is 100% definitely not targeted at in anyway at all, and Is simply just a general statement, since like December.

They (the general user base of here... definitely) dosent ever seem to go to BC so there's never a complaint made that would need replying to. And even if there was its "wait for the admin" so no point commenting anyway -w-

But anyways, yeah it is annoying as **** and not really supposed to be ignored. It's like report bombing, but thats actually a valid reason to remove

 

[Kim]

Could easily be seen as trolling, and or spam or harrassing

Glad you said this , so from now on when we are flooded with a certain persons unwanted reactions we can report her for this very reason and it will be actioned?

@Soapie always been the rules however, i too had 1 user on ignore the whole time i was Mod-Admin , ive had some PM's but what this guy used to send me was stuff that you'd see in the vilest horror movies ever.
I edited this to add that btw.

 

[Bampot 2.0]

It won’t.

HR would it pain you to consider the possibility that may be you are being fooled with??

You seen her illnesses have you? You been with her to the specialists and hospitals have you?

Come on man, too much baby cradling.

 

[Kim]

It won’t.

HR would it pain you to consider the possibility that may be you are being fooled with??

You seen her illnesses have you? You been with her to the specialists and hospitals have you?

Come on man, too much baby cradling.

You are allowed to quote me , no rules against that .

 

[Bampot 2.0]

You are allowed to quote me , no rules against that .

I think if any sense prevails the UMs will begin to work as a team rather than to work in a separate, discretionary way.

It goes against this forum’s fortunes to have 3 differing opinions on user disciplinary actions with only one action from basically one UM 😟.

CM doesn’t count he can do things without us to see so the impact is different.

EDIT: then again maybe no one cares coz forums isn’t as important anymore. Who knows……

 

[Inkandtatts]

Everyone, calm your cockles. HR has clarified the misconception that we all had:

Its already "warnable"

Could easily be seen as trolling, and or spam or harrassing

There's so much irony in the voting results:

 

[Louize]

... Yes @'PRINCESSA I got my stern telling off from HR.

Know the next time you do it to any of us, we can now report you too, though. I give it a week before you next have a meltdown.

 

[Boba Fett]

... Yes @'PRINCESSA I got my stern telling off from HR.

Know the next time you do it to any of us, we can now report you too, though. I give it a week before you next have a meltdown.

Sh*t like her routine annoys me because I've worked with the mentally challenged, have family members on the spectrum that are non verbal and none of them..not a single one try to harass people. They may have anger issues but they dont take it out on others and have so much love to give. This bullsh*t on this site of giving her behavior a pass because of the fact she claims to have all these problems is a f*ckin joke that's not funny.