Unemployed people

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr-Liberal-Minded
  • Start date Start date
Get a job, then you maybe important enough to post to me.

Says the potman in Wetherspoons. 🙄

Unemployed people are like dog poo on the bottom of my nice, shiney, expensive shoes that I bought using my wages I get... From working.

And I bet you've been scraping that dog shiate from your shoes for dinner, because the wages you probably earned were eaten up buying that pair of shoes from Barratts.

Unemployed people should be be forced to get a job - Or join the military. Use them as Cannon fodder somewhere.

You mean like you get used as canon fodder every Friday and Saturday nite, when the teeny drunks smash your bar up, and maybe your face? :lmao:

If they refuse? Execute them.

Someone should shove an optic right up your ass.
e9yl1k.gif
 
reasons

reasons

Legitimate reasons for being out of work: Discrimination, physical disability, mental disability, suffering from drugs, live in place where you have no reliable transportion, etc. Besides, even if every position were filled there would still be unemployed people or have you not heard about the lack of jobs in places. Not to jump on you but to do away with unemployed people is just as ignorant as banning you from this chat room for having an opinion that offends some peoples.
 
LOL - and what's your job then? 🙄

This is an extremely old post. The job market was not the same at that time [I think they meant USA but idk]. Though we are technically not in a recession anymore in the USA it's still not easy to find a job right now unless you have the qualifications and specific fields. But going to college for specific fields also screws you later if the job outlook is bad in the field because then it's almost like your degree is worthless and people are hiring you based on other factors.
 
I can say I was blessed to of been raised with both Republicans and Democrats in my family, to see the issues from both sides. Especially when it came to public welfare, assistance, unemployment, and reasonable solutions to create jobs. It absoloutely makes me sick to hear some Republicans say it is not conservative to give so much assistance and make slight hand comments against the poor and middle class--- and it also makes me sick to see Democrats believe the answer is throw more money into programs, which are not really helping people but rather making people dependent on the government.

It reminds me of a board game (I recommend it to anyone) called "OPINIONS", and you have one minute to make a case for (or against) a certain issue or topic. One time, playing with my nephew, he drew a card that said "Make a case against welfare" and he did and thought he did a good job. Being that his views were more Republican, he thought he made a good argument. Then it was my turn. "Remember the monthly food assistance your mom and dad had gotten when you guys didn't have an income? Could you imagine how hard it would have been had you not had that? It was hard enough only getting $400 a month to stretch out to feed six people, wasn't it? And you know it wasn't your father's fault, or your mother's fault either, for not being able to make enough to feed everyone." And he saw the point.

I look at this world, and I see that economic woes are everywhere. For example, there was an article last year about how HOMELESSNESS went up nearly 20% in the city of Dublin, Ireland around Christmas time. And I am thinking to myself, "How can such things be, when such giant corporations as Pfizer are taking their business to Ireland?".... and the conclusion I can come to is that despite all the low taxes on businesses, is that none of it benefits the common man. Only the rich and the government.

I find it ironic, when other nations criticize America (for example) they point out to how far better off America is than other nations and how much money there is. They point out that virtually every American has access to television, phones, internet. And while that is true, that such creature comforts are available, what they don't consider is how very little is done to combat escelating home energy costs are or the price of food is going up. They don't take into consideration the tremendous hoops people have to jump through, in order to remotely get the most basic of assistance if you do not fit a certain profile of color, gender, and location.

Take myself for example, I can't get assistance in my own county in terms of healthcare or financial. I have been going, thank Jesus, to local clinics that are funded by public donations.... to get teeth worked on, or to see a doctor.... or I simply have to go to an emergency room. Or my family and I have to go to a local food bank once every month, to supliment whatever food we're able to buy off our own income. Why can't I get assistance from my own county? I'm not a minority. Or I'm not on social security or disability. Or I'm not a single mother. Or I'm not a drug addict. Or (in total) my family makes collectively too much money for one program, and not enough in another. The system is completely a mess from top to bottom.

I can thank Jesus every day that I managed to find a job, during this recession that has been ongoing for a decade. I was without work, despite beating the pavement looking for work, for almost five years. Without the love and support of my own family, I would probably have been living in my car somewhere, until I was told to go elsewhere by a cop or thrown in jail for loitering. In this time of year I can't help but remember Charles Dickens A Christmas Carol when Scrooge was mockingly told by Father Christmas "Are there no work houses, are there no prisons?" for the poor and needy.

Now that being said, I'm not in favor of socialism or communism. Throwing money at programs and at people, by and large, has not shown advancement--- but rather creating a generational issue of people dependent on that money--- that's like putting a band aid on an open wound and hoping that will stop the gushing. I'm more in favor of job creation, job programs that don't require people to go through alot of trouble to get work, and teaching people new skills that can get them the learning necessary to get better paying jobs. Personally I think it would be great if public service announcements were made locally 24/7 of temporary openings---- "One worker needed with no experience at this location," or "Ten workers needed with little experience at this location," etc so people can have one day, two day, three days (or even a week, or month, etc) of pay--- rather than hand over $200, $300, $400, etc. at some welfare organisation and have to make it stretch out for a whole month.

Just my two cents.
 
and of course, can't see why anyone cares - like, if my neighbour is out of work then so what, makes no difference to me, Jesus Christ, some people just want something to complain about
 
and of course, can't see why anyone cares - like, if my neighbour is out of work then so what, makes no difference to me, Jesus Christ, some people just want something to complain about
You are right actually. There is very little to complain about anymore, so we start complaining about the smaller things.
 
After reading these threads I feel like getting of the net and working.

Or maybe I should change jobs and become a butcher so I can make Liberal Sausages.
 
if you are unemployed i think you must do something start something with which you can get something for living.
 
"Unemployed people" is a broad range of people. I'd imagine the unemployed, yet disabled people should receive a pardon.
 
How dumb?

How dumb?

I'm a manager of a Wetherspoons public house.

You bunch of lazy lay-abouts.

Go to the job centre! Get a job! Stop wasting taxes!

So you spend you're day serving unemployed people cheap food & beer??
I'm sure you're aware that Wetherspoons have a diverse clientele.
Sure your employers would be interested to know who you are! Why don't you big up :hammer:

BTW I was once an ignorant prick like you, be careful 'cause karma's a bitch!
 
Top