“World Events, Politics & News”

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 263960
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision recognizing IP addresses as protected under the Charter of Rights can be viewed as both a victory against state encroachment and a potential hurdle for internet safety. On the one hand, the recognition reinforces individuals' rights to privacy and protection from unwarranted state intrusion into their online activities. However, it may pose challenges for internet safety efforts, potentially limiting law enforcement's ability to track and address online threats effectively. Striking a balance between individual rights and ensuring a secure online environment may be a complex challenge in the wake of this decision.
 
The Supreme Court of Canada's decision recognizing IP addresses as protected under the Charter of Rights can be viewed as both a victory against state encroachment and a potential hurdle for internet safety. On the one hand, the recognition reinforces individuals' rights to privacy and protection from unwarranted state intrusion into their online activities. However, it may pose challenges for internet safety efforts, potentially limiting law enforcement's ability to track and address online threats effectively. Striking a balance between individual rights and ensuring a secure online environment may be a complex challenge in the wake of this decision.
You believe that do you? Because the Supreme Court ruled this so that would mean that this is victorious? Ah?

There IS no privacy with the current technologies available and especially the advance type of technologies that you and I WOULDN’T have access to.

Far out man….has everybody gone dumb and dumber to believe that we have privacy in our lives?

Forget it.
 
Big-Brother-is-Watching-You.jpg
 
is freedom of expression in danger in Canada? Censoring "Speech I hate" under the umbrella of "Hate Speech laws"
I’d say not. The definitions are quite stringent

“content that foments hatred means content that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination, within the meaning of the Canadian Human Rights Act, and that, given the context in which it is communicated, is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of such a prohibited ground.‍ (contenu fomentant la haine)”

And they go further:

“For greater certainty and for the purposes of the definition content that foments hatred, content does not express detestation or vilification solely because it expresses disdain or dislike or it discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends.”

If there was a group of 20 people who diiike divorcees they could:

  • Discuss in private messages how they think divorcees should all be burnt at the stake, or
  • Post on social media site that the dislike divorcees
But they couldn’t post in public on a social media platform saying that they think all divorcees are trash because they’re dirty, washed up, subhuman individuals that should be kept in cages for the amusement of all spinsters, bachelors, and married folk. (More accurately they could post it but it would have to be removed by the platform)
 
"denialism" a crime? Or long overdue? Currently its a crime to say the holocausr didnt happen.
I wouldn't go as far as saying it needs to be criminalised. There probably isn't a need for that anyway - the people that advance "denialism" of serious things such as the Holocaust are often/usually guilty of many other offences. An anti-Semite is going to have something knocking around in their lives showing that they hate Jews
 
I wouldn't go as far as saying it needs to be criminalised. There probably isn't a need for that anyway - the people that advance "denialism" of serious things such as the Holocaust are often/usually guilty of many other offences. An anti-Semite is going to have something knocking around in their lives showing that they hate Jews
what I find concerning, is that ultimately a wrong view of history is criminalized- which really is "thought crime" alarming that a factual error can be criminalized.
 
It's only a crime if it can be proven you were doing it to willfully promote antisemitism and didn't actually believe the things you were saying.
(3.1) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2.1)

  • (a) if they establish that the statements communicated were true;
  • (b) if, in good faith, they expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
  • (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds they believed them to be true; or
  • (d) if, in good faith, they intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of antisemitism toward Jews.

still an extreme overreach by any government to threaten prison for people expressing their beliefs and opinions, no matter how shite they are. and for them to decide whether or not you truly believe them.
 
It's only a crime if it can be proven you were doing it to willfully promote antisemitism and didn't actually believe the things you were saying.
(3.1) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2.1)

  • (a) if they establish that the statements communicated were true;
  • (b) if, in good faith, they expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
  • (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds they believed them to be true; or
  • (d) if, in good faith, they intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of antisemitism toward Jews.

still an extreme overreach by any government to threaten prison for people expressing their beliefs and opinions, no matter how shite they are. and for them to decide whether or not you truly believe them.

In Germany, the penalty for publicly denying the Holocaust is a prison sentence, which I find understandable in light of Germany’s troubled history, even though not all Germans were on the wrong side of history so to speak.

If my memory serves me correctly, a woman called Ursula Haverbeck was recently sentenced to a total of 4 years in prison for publicly denying the Holocaust.
 
If you care for privacy don't use any technology and move into the woods. Otherwise, you will never have privacy. most if not all the newer devices all listen to some extent and some even record etc. I don't care personally because the age of privacy died many years ago. America, England, France, Germany and most countries probably all at this point spy on their own people. So, when it comes to privacy and if you really want it then leave all technology behind and move far away into a secluded wooded area and then maybe you will get the privacy you want. besides everything you do links back to you no matter what. That is why the only way in modern times to be private is use hardly or no tech at all. to me it doesn't matter because who cares if some random Indian scammer or American big tech company knows everything about me, I have nothing to hide nor care about what people know about me. I get that others do care and my advice to those people is to leave all or most of your tech behind and that way you can have your privacy you want.
 
That's kinda funny when you think about it, Canada literally stole cash from the truckers during the Covid mandated shots but NOW is worried about internet privacy ? 🤣
good point, in fairness, the trucker convoy made a serious mistake- they briefly published a manifesto calling for the illegal /overthrow -replacing of the Canadian Government.

That's what got the feds really peeved- and contributed to the govr triggering the Emergiencies Act (former known as the "War Measures Act" which in turn allowed for the seizing of bank accounts etc (something that had a lot of people worried)
 
That's kinda funny when you think about it, Canada literally stole cash from the truckers during the Covid mandated shots but NOW is worried about internet privacy ? 🤣

good point, in fairness, the trucker convoy made a serious mistake- they briefly published a manifesto calling for the illegal /overthrow -replacing of the Canadian Government.

That's what got the feds really peeved- and contributed to the govr triggering the Emergiencies Act (former known as the "War Measures Act" which in turn allowed for the seizing of bank accounts etc (something that had a lot of people worried)

They didn't steal or seize any money from bank accounts though did they?

Didn't they just freeze them for a short time because the source of the money in the funding campaigns were shady with at least half of it coming from the US and because the protest was getting way out of hand causing chaos and violence? I'm pretty sure the crowd funding website eventually denied their service because of violence.
 
They didn't steal or seize any money from bank accounts though did they?

No actual funds - to my knowledge, but accounts were frozen, initial reports said a lot of money was coming from the USA
 
if you're talking about ernst Zundel, he was a bit more than just "a denier". jfc

I’d say that the majority of deniers are more than just deniers tbf. This guy was raised in a fiercely traditional and conservative milieu and that’s basically the context in which he operated. It’s like the people who were involved in the attack on the capitol. Most of them were involved in all kinds of hateful acts, not just one specific act. People always act from within a socio-cultural framework or context, in this case a culture de-emphasizing the importance of critical thinking, education and an open-access society, making them prone to conspiracy theories and scapegoating. I mean, you’ve got to be utterly delusional and morally corrupt to deny something as horrible as the Holocaust.
 
Wasn’t that in the 80s as well - 40 years before holocaust denial became a criminal offence - and the only person in Canada to ever be prosecuted for it?
yeah he was prosecuted a few times in the 80's. the convictions were eventually overturned because even back then they decided it was a civil rights violation. in the early 2000 he was deported from the u.s. to canada for overstaying on a visa. then once back in canada they eventually deported him back to germany for being deemed a threat to national security.

guy was a neo-nazi and published or co-authored works like .....The Hitler We Loved and Why and Did Six Million Really Die? The Truth At Last.

so to boil it down to a denier that was convicted and deported especially in regard to the current topic is kind of misleading.
 
Zundel was convicted crfiminally of spreading "false news" in relation to "denying" and beat the charge in the SCC as "spreading false news" was deemed unconstitutional. Later- He was deported to face criminal trail, elsewhere. Canadians cant be extradicted to a diff country unless a similar law exists here they are accused of-- so he was deported for hate speech accusations.

Not to be confused with Keegstra who was convicted of denying under hate speech laws,
 
Zundel was convicted crfiminally of spreading "false news" in relation to "denying" and beat the charge in the SCC as "spreading false news" was deemed unconstitutional. Later- He was deported to face criminal trail, elsewhere. Canadians cant be extradicted to a diff country unless a similar law exists here they are accused of-- so he was deported for hate speech accusations.
Think Sesame Street GIF


Zundel didn’t quite “beat the charge in the SCC though, did he? They ordered a retrial and he was convicted again.

Zundel wasn’t Canadian. He had no right to be in Canada after leaving Canada, living in the US, being deported from the US and returned to Canada.

The ironic thing is that he then applied to Canada for refugee status to swerve a German arrest warrant.

I particularly like the guy from CBC’s comment "If Ernst Zündel is a refugee, Daffy Duck is Albert Einstein…Some propositions are so ludicrous that they are a betrayal of common sense and human dignity if allowed a moment's oxygen."

He wasn’t deported for hate speech accusations at all.

He was deported because he was a threat to National Security due to his links to neo-Nazi groups


Not to be confused with Keegstra who was convicted of denying under hate speech laws,
Tell Me More Jeff Goldblum GIF by National Geographic Channel


It was a little bit more than “denying” though, wasn’t it?

He was a teacher brainwashing his students with anti-Semitic views, racist views, conspiracy theories about Jews trying to conquer the world, and that the holocaust was a hoax. Hardly just a “denier”
 
Zundel didn’t quite “beat the charge in the SCC though, did he? They ordered a retrial and he was convicted again.
he was convicyed a second time, however AFTER that he sucessfully appealed to the SCC which overturned his conviction as the provision he was convicted under was unconstitutional.

Zundel immigrated to Canada, and thus has the full protections of Canadian Law,

He wasn’t deported for hate speech accusations at all.
He was deported to face thiose accusations, Canadians whether citizens, refugees or landed immigrants ALL have the same Charter protections.

Canadians cannot be extradicted to face charges elsewhere unless a similar offence exists here. The government of the day deported him, to face trial in Germany, which if tried here, would have resulted in the exact same outcome. (conviction and deportation)

The bar to deport based on an extradition request is very low- and its clear to all those who know- the govt wanted him out. The rest is semantics.
 
he was convicyed a second time, however AFTER that he sucessfully appealed to the SCC which overturned his conviction as the provision he was convicted under was unconstitutional.

Zundel immigrated to Canada, and thus has the full protections of Canadian Law,


He was deported to face thiose accusations, Canadians whether citizens, refugees or landed immigrants ALL have the same Charter protections.

Canadians cannot be extradicted to face charges elsewhere unless a similar offence exists here. The government of the day deported him, to face trial in Germany, which if tried here, would have resulted in the exact same outcome. (conviction and deportation)

The bar to deport based on an extradition request is very low- and its clear to all those who know- the govt wanted him out. The rest is semantics.

Can’t possibly imagine why anyone would want that type of character out of their country, semantics or not. It does show all those protections that exist against a tyrannical Government though
 
Can’t possibly imagine why anyone would want that type of character out of their country, semantics or not. It does show all those protections that exist against a tyrannical Government though

I added the bold) the Conservative leader of his Majesties Loyal Opposition has vowed to remove those protections, via the "notwithstanding clause" a section of the charter that lets governments iggy any court decision, including those of the SCoC which is very alarming.

In effect one branch of government making the next irrelvant.
 
I added the bold) the Conservative leader of his Majesties Loyal Opposition has vowed to remove those protections, via the "notwithstanding clause" a section of the charter that lets governments iggy any court decision, including those of the SCoC which is very alarming.

In effect one branch of government making the next irrelvant.
Alarming but passable in Parliament? Unlikely.
 
Alarming but passable in Parliament? Unlikely.
The nothwithstanding clause can be triggered by the governemnt. It was intended to be rarely used and never pre emtively, however thats changing, Leader of Opposition says if they win, he will use it to over ride decisions they dont like- after the fact OR when tabling legislation. The latter is shocking as it effectively removes any judicial oversight relating to the Constitution.

The only way it could be stopped is if its a minority Parliament.
 
The nothwithstanding clause can be triggered by the governemnt. It was intended to be rarely used and never pre emtively, however thats changing, Leader of Opposition says if they win, he will use it to over ride decisions they dont like- after the fact OR when tabling legislation. The latter is shocking as it effectively removes any judicial oversight relating to the Constitution.

The only way it could be stopped is if it’s a minority Parliament.
Here’s hoping for another Trudeau administration, or If not and the opposition gets a big enough majority that the Leader does what all of them do - bluster before an election to get the votes then abandon it when they’re in office (except Starmer. He seems to be doing alright so far)
 

"Peaceful protesters" 1st amendment pepper sprayed?
Definition of “peaceful protesters” from a CBS article that the video was used in:

“Thousands of protesters gathered near the Capitol, chanting "Free, Free Palestine," and some tried to block streets ahead of Netanyahu's speech, the Associated Press reported. Police wearing gas marks blocked the crowd — which was calling for an end to the war in Gaza that has killed more than 39,000 Palestinians according to Gaza officials — from getting closer to the Capitol.

The U.S. Capitol Police said on social media that pepper spray was being deployed because some members of the crowd had "started to become violent" and failed to obey an order to move back from the police line

After the protesters were turned away by police, they wound through Capitol Hill for several blocks before gathering in front of Union Station, according to the Associated Press, where protesters climbed the flagpoles outside Union Station and replaced the American flags with Palestinian flags. At least one person was arrested, and police again deployed "chemical agents," the AP reported, causing at least two people to be treated for chemical agent effects on the eyes.”
 
Definition of “peaceful protesters” from a CBS article that the video was used in:

“Thousands of protesters gathered near the Capitol, chanting "Free, Free Palestine," and some tried to block streets ahead of Netanyahu's speech, the Associated Press reported. Police wearing gas marks blocked the crowd — which was calling for an end to the war in Gaza that has killed more than 39,000 Palestinians according to Gaza officials — from getting closer to the Capitol.

The U.S. Capitol Police said on social media that pepper spray was being deployed because some members of the crowd had "started to become violent" and failed to obey an order to move back from the police line

After the protesters were turned away by police, they wound through Capitol Hill for several blocks before gathering in front of Union Station, according to the Associated Press, where protesters climbed the flagpoles outside Union Station and replaced the American flags with Palestinian flags. At least one person was arrested, and police again deployed "chemical agents," the AP reported, causing at least two people to be treated for chemical agent effects on the eyes.”
but no images of the violence in that article that I saw.
 
What does this have to do with Canada? Please stay on topic.
I thought that but OP changed the title of the thread to “…Canada/ world” so he could widen the scope and keep it on topic when he wanted to post about something South of the Canadian border.

Holocaust denial, Nazis, Canadian truckers who didn’t have their money stolen, and peppers sprayed protesters though 🤷‍♂️
 
I thought that but OP changed the title of the thread to “…Canada/ world” so he could widen the scope and keep it on topic when he wanted to post about something South of the Canadian border.

Holocaust denial, Nazis, Canadian truckers who didn’t have their money stolen, and peppers sprayed protesters though 🤷‍♂️
and for whatever reason (wink)....part of the olympic opening ceremonies
 
I thought it was a demo on infringing the rights of others
View attachment 975559

I saw some message boards off the CBC world section- which showed that video, which depicted the apostles as drag queens, Jesus as an obese woman or drag queen, and children in a bizzarre depiction of the last supper (as part of the Olympic opening) - it relates to Canada in that I was surprised by the number of comments calling it "Satanic" etc. Also not shown a headless corpse - holding the head and singing, and eventually the pale rider galloping towards them.
 
The Pine Beetle has been ravaging forests for years- leaving large swaths of standing dead. Jasper is a federal Park, yet the government didnt manage the world famous park, and now historic Jasper is severely damaged.

The USA has the same issues with Pine Beetle - but the President of the Day only suggested burning down the forests in a controlled manner ....

Why has the decline and death of the great forests been ignored, by both government and environmentalists and climate scientists.
 
post a random video with no context or comment

describe something as "the apostles as drag queens, Jesus as an obese woman or drag queen, and children in a bizzarre depiction of the last supper" and then feign shock over comments of people calling it satanic.

and a french performance by a french band referencing french history, marie antoninette and the french revolution in an event that was all about the history and culture of france? gasp! i'm clutching all the pearls right now.
 
canada is the 51st sate of america isnt it? kinda like new zealand is the 7th state of australia
No. a bit like how Canada, Australia and New Zealand are still in effect British dominions, but are called commonwealth countries because the former is too much of a bitter pill for them to swallow.

Btw, sate is skewered meat served with a peanut or kecap manis sauce.

De rien, bon appétit/selamat makan.
 
Christ, the thread has been re-titled again 😂 who needs anything to be topical.

World issue:

I’m more concerned about a convicted child rapist being allowed to compete in the Olympics than people depicting the last supper. They’ve even segregated said convict for his own protection.
 
If memory serves me right (and it may not because..age) there used to be a section specifically for news and current affairs. I dunno why it doesn't exist anymore but if it did, it would be topic appropriate for all the threads like this one and others regarding the election, Israel/Hamas war etc . I noticed other sections like Roleplay existing and its as dead as my love life. (Kidding nothing is as dead as that).
 
If memory serves me right (and it may not because..age) there used to be a section specifically for news and current affairs. I dunno why it doesn't exist anymore but if it did, it would be topic appropriate for all the threads like this one and others regarding the election, Israel/Hamas war etc . I noticed other sections like Roleplay existing and its as dead as my love life. (Kidding nothing is as dead as that).
There was a politics forum too I think




Cleaning up the title 🙂
 
This from France panning the opening of the olympics. Many people are being quite critical of the opening. Should politics, religion sex; or orientation have any place with international sports?

Its very easy to be critical, Im also interested in hearing those who think the opening ceremony wasn't "the worst in olympic history."

edit: ive chosen this report because it has the least inflammatory language.
 
If memory serves me right (and it may not because..age) there used to be a section specifically for news and current affairs. I dunno why it doesn't exist anymore but if it did, it would be topic appropriate for all the threads like this one and others regarding the election, Israel/Hamas war etc . I noticed other sections like Roleplay existing and its as dead as my love life. (Kidding nothing is as dead as that).
Yes they did and it was pretty popular.

“World Events, Politics & News” it was called.
Used to have an Irish girl called Katie post multiple articles daily.

It should be put back. Oh, and LINKS ALLOWED to support the news being spoken about.
 
This from France panning the opening of the olympics. Many people are being quite critical of the opening. Should politics, religion sex; or orientation have any place with international sports?

Its very easy to be critical, Im also interested in hearing those who think the opening ceremony wasn't "the worst in olympic history."

edit: ive chosen this report because it has the least inflammatory language.
I’m selectively boycotting much of the Olympics because they’ve allowed a convicted child rapist to compete so I didn’t watch the opening ceremony.

Politics: seems to be a lot of far right politicians making a fuss as they always do, about anything they can latch on to like the leeches many of them are. I don’t agree with many of the far right policies but I don’t think it would be right to stop them commenting on news shows and talk shows just because there’s an international sporting event, as long as they keep their racism and related abhorrent views to themselves.

Religion: I don’t see a problem with allowing some religious expression. Religion in many countries is becoming less relevant so giving religion an international platform probably isn’t a bad idea. It gives them a lot of free publicity

Sex: I read that the athletes’ village provide condoms free of charge to avoid pregnancy and STDs. I also heard this year there’s some suggestion that they’ve made “anti-sex beds” for the athletes but Tom Daley posted a silly video showing that it’s just a rumour and demonstrated that sex is probably possible on those beds.

I also don’t think that athletes should abstain from sex just because they’re competing (apart from the child rapist. He should abstain for life - preferably by having chemical castration that prevents him from doing it). I’m pretty sure having sex-starved athletes probably isn’t good for them when trying to compete especially in the sports where they’re wearing very little. Nobody wants to see someone being aroused while they’re mid-dive. Now I’ve said that I’m thinking that sex should probably be encouraged to prevent anyone getting an eyeful.

Spectators being part of whichever international sporting event it is, should also not have to abstain. Doing so would create tension that could spill into disorder.

Sexual orientation: this goes hand in hand with sex. I’m all for anyone being able to have sex during the Olympics or any other sporting event regardless of their sexual orientation whether that’s on the “anti-sex” beds or any other beds or places where it’s possible and legal to have sex. I don’t think they should flip from straight to gay or vice-versa because of the Olympics.

TL;DR: don’t stop people having sex, don’t silence religion, don’t completely silence the far-right
 
It's only a crime if it can be proven you were doing it to willfully promote antisemitism and didn't actually believe the things you were saying.
(3.1) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2.1)

  • (a) if they establish that the statements communicated were true;
  • (b) if, in good faith, they expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
  • (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds they believed them to be true; or
  • (d) if, in good faith, they intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of antisemitism toward Jews.

still an extreme overreach by any government to threaten prison for people expressing their beliefs and opinions, no matter how shite they are. and for them to decide whether or not you truly believe them.
It ends up as a weapon that government will use if you say things that they don't like.

I didn't realize Canada even had the internet.
Don't mess with Canada..they will give you a stern looking at!

This from France panning the opening of the olympics. Many people are being quite critical of the opening. Should politics, religion sex; or orientation have any place with international sports?

Its very easy to be critical, Im also interested in hearing those who think the opening ceremony wasn't "the worst in olympic history."

edit: ive chosen this report because it has the least inflammatory language.
I wonder what the outcome would be if you mocked other religions during the Olympics ?
 
I want to know why Israel couldn’t wear the yellow pin thing, yet (as mentioned previously) the Dutch team has a nonce and will be surrounded by some of the people he is a danger to.
 
You don't need a bed to have Sex wouldn't stop anything
Very important 🌎 issue. I made a thread because this type of thing deserves its own thread https://forum.chat-avenue.com/threads/swingathon-and-the-like.951115/

I want to know why Israel couldn’t wear the yellow pin thing, yet (as mentioned previously) the Dutch team has a nonce and will be surrounded by some of the people he is a danger to.
Apparently they don’t allow any political things at the Olympics
 
I’m selectively boycotting much of the Olympics because they’ve allowed a convicted child rapist to compete so I didn’t watch the opening ceremony.

omg that's quite alarming- what country is the creep from?

What is your thinking of them having children in the drag queen act?
 
omg that's quite alarming- what country is the creep from?
The Netherlands

In August 2014 van de Velde, then 19 years old, raped a 12-year-old girl he had met on F who lived in Milton Keynes, England. He travelled to her home and, when her mother was out, gave her alchol and then raped her several times at her home as well as near Furzton Lake which was nearby. The victim would eventually go on to self harm and once overdosed.
 
The Netherlands

In August 2014 van de Velde, then 19 years old, raped a 12-year-old girl he had met on F who lived in Milton Keynes, England. He travelled to her home and, when her mother was out, gave her alchol and then raped her several times at her home as well as near Furzton Lake which was nearby. The victim would eventually go on to self harm and once overdosed.
death penalty should of been given
 
A study has found that a blood test can determine with 90% accuracy whether cognitive decline is due to Alzheimer’s.

Scientists are hopeful that by identifying this horrible disease earlier, it could pave the way for a cure. 💜

Dr. Maria Carrillo, chief science officer of the Alzheimer’s Association, has said that the hope is it can be used in primary care in the same way as taking a cholesterol test
 
Edna O’Brien has passed away at the age of 93.

She was an Irish author whose books were banned in Ireland and even publicly burned by a local parish priest.

To quote the New Statesman:

“With every aspect of women’s lives invaded by, and subject to, the whims of a state machine ideologically opposed to female emancipation – under the direction of a meticulously prurient Catholic Church – O’Brien’s invocation of female characters who dared desire more from life than domestic and sexual servitude, emotional disaffection and intellectual abnegation, was nothing short of revolutionary.”


What a trailblazer. Rest in Peace 💛
 
the whims of a state machine ideologically opposed to female emancipation
I assume by "state machine" they mean government. Do they give any specific examples of that opposition, or is the parrish preist the example?

edit: all I can find is "pulpit" opposition for publishing book(s) on sex (re women) in the 1940's
 
Yes they did and it was pretty popular.

“World Events, Politics & News” it was called.
Used to have an Irish girl called Katie post multiple articles daily.

It should be put back. Oh, and LINKS ALLOWED to support the news being spoken about.
ty, ive change the title to conform to OG, have to double check about links- but if they are on topic I don't see why not , @Apollo @Ness_eb

edit: debate forum rules to apply to

“World Events, Politics & News”​

threads
 
I assume by "state machine" they mean government. Do they give any specific examples of that opposition, or is the parrish preist the example?

edit: all I can find is "pulpit" opposition for publishing book(s) on sex (re women) in the 1940's
It was more of a news thing but Edith would have been a teen in the 40s. if you G00gle her name and include “Irish author” you should find plenty of info on her. If you want further reading you could G00gle something like “what was life like for women in 1960s Ireland?” and you should find plenty of examples.
 
UPDATE on the Olympic Opening Ceremony

Some Christians and churches are whining that they were being mocked because it was mocking the last supper

Some artists are whining that Da Vinci (or was is Di Caprio) was being mocked because it was mocking the painting “The Last Supper”

Far right politicians are whining because…well, they seek out things to whine about to detract from what they are.

The truth from the organiser is even more horrific. He was depicting a pagan party promoting liberty, equality, and fraternity while linking it to the Gods of Olympus.

What a storm in a teacup, and nobody thought to comment on the flag being raised upside down at the end of the ceremony
 
so what your saying is, the only ones with any right to complain are the people who worship the greek gods. finally got that sorted.
Seems that way. No Christians were harmed in the production according to the latest news

Also, as one such worshipper I have no objections to the opening ceremony and the Greek God @Apollo likes me in drag
 
what is this thread even about???

it's been changed, & derailed like 10 times since it's been made 💀
It started off being about internet and privacy issues in Canada

Then it became Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about something that happened in the US

Then it became all issues in Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about the Olympics

Then it became everything everywhere on world events, politics and news when @-Luka took a trip down memory lane

OP has referred to Irish sex books from the 1940s so now there’s a high probability that it will be retitled to “Historical and Current World Events, Politics & News”

TL;DR (it’s an EE thread in all but location)
 
It's getting hot! ☀️😎🌻🌞⛱️🌄🌆

Yellow heat health warnings have been issued across much of England with forecasts saying temperatures may climb to as high as 32C (90F) on Tuesday. All areas of England, except the North East and North West, are covered by the warnings from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), which are in place until Wednesday.

The agency said the hot weather may have "significant impacts" on the health and social care sector, particularly across the South East of England and London.

The Met Office has separately issued a yellow alert for thunderstorms later in the week which covers most of England and parts of Wales.

The UKHSA has warned the hot spell may make an "observed increase in mortality across the population likely, particularly in the 65-plus age group or those with health conditions, but impacts may also be seen in younger age groups".
 
It started off being about internet and privacy issues in Canada

Then it became Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about something that happened in the US

Then it became all issues in Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about the Olympics

Then it became everything everywhere on world events, politics and news when @-Luka took a trip down memory lane

OP has referred to Irish sex books from the 1940s so now there’s a high probability that it will be retitled to “Historical and Current World Events, Politics & News”

TL;DR (it’s an EE thread in all but location)
It’s a topic fluid thread 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
In Germany, the penalty for publicly denying the Holocaust is a prison sentence, which I find understandable in light of Germany’s troubled history, even though not all Germans were on the wrong side of history so to speak.

If my memory serves me correctly, a woman called Ursula Haverbeck was recently sentenced to a total of 4 years in prison for publicly denying the Holocaust.
what about russia?
 
UPDATE on the Olympic Opening Ceremony

Some Christians and churches are whining that they were being mocked because it was mocking the last supper

Some artists are whining that Da Vinci (or was is Di Caprio) was being mocked because it was mocking the painting “The Last Supper”

Far right politicians are whining because…well, they seek out things to whine about to detract from what they are.

The truth from the organiser is even more horrific. He was depicting a pagan party promoting liberty, equality, and fraternity while linking it to the Gods of Olympus.

What a storm in a teacup, and nobody thought to comment on the flag being raised upside down at the end of the ceremony
that's a womp womp moment
 
It started off being about internet and privacy issues in Canada

Then it became Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about something that happened in the US

Then it became all issues in Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about the Olympics

Then it became everything everywhere on world events, politics and news when @-Luka took a trip down memory lane

OP has referred to Irish sex books from the 1940s so now there’s a high probability that it will be retitled to “Historical and Current World Events, Politics & News”

TL;DR (it’s an EE thread in all but location)
No one has any brain cells apart from civilians
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top