D
You believe that do you? Because the Supreme Court ruled this so that would mean that this is victorious? Ah?The Supreme Court of Canada's decision recognizing IP addresses as protected under the Charter of Rights can be viewed as both a victory against state encroachment and a potential hurdle for internet safety. On the one hand, the recognition reinforces individuals' rights to privacy and protection from unwarranted state intrusion into their online activities. However, it may pose challenges for internet safety efforts, potentially limiting law enforcement's ability to track and address online threats effectively. Striking a balance between individual rights and ensuring a secure online environment may be a complex challenge in the wake of this decision.
🤣🤔I love you motherland Russia
🤔is freedom of expression in danger in Canada? Censoring "Speech I hate" under the umbrella of "Hate Speech laws"
I’d say not. The definitions are quite stringentis freedom of expression in danger in Canada? Censoring "Speech I hate" under the umbrella of "Hate Speech laws"
I wouldn't go as far as saying it needs to be criminalised. There probably isn't a need for that anyway - the people that advance "denialism" of serious things such as the Holocaust are often/usually guilty of many other offences. An anti-Semite is going to have something knocking around in their lives showing that they hate Jews"denialism" a crime? Or long overdue? Currently its a crime to say the holocausr didnt happen.
what I find concerning, is that ultimately a wrong view of history is criminalized- which really is "thought crime" alarming that a factual error can be criminalized.I wouldn't go as far as saying it needs to be criminalised. There probably isn't a need for that anyway - the people that advance "denialism" of serious things such as the Holocaust are often/usually guilty of many other offences. An anti-Semite is going to have something knocking around in their lives showing that they hate Jews
Right?!That's kinda funny when you think about it, Canada literally stole cash from the truckers during the Covid mandated shots but NOW is worried about internet privacy ? 🤣
It's only a crime if it can be proven you were doing it to willfully promote antisemitism and didn't actually believe the things you were saying.
(3.1) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2.1)
- (a) if they establish that the statements communicated were true;
- (b) if, in good faith, they expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
- (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds they believed them to be true; or
- (d) if, in good faith, they intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of antisemitism toward Jews.
still an extreme overreach by any government to threaten prison for people expressing their beliefs and opinions, no matter how shite they are. and for them to decide whether or not you truly believe them.
good point, in fairness, the trucker convoy made a serious mistake- they briefly published a manifesto calling for the illegal /overthrow -replacing of the Canadian Government.That's kinda funny when you think about it, Canada literally stole cash from the truckers during the Covid mandated shots but NOW is worried about internet privacy ? 🤣
That's kinda funny when you think about it, Canada literally stole cash from the truckers during the Covid mandated shots but NOW is worried about internet privacy ? 🤣
good point, in fairness, the trucker convoy made a serious mistake- they briefly published a manifesto calling for the illegal /overthrow -replacing of the Canadian Government.
That's what got the feds really peeved- and contributed to the govr triggering the Emergiencies Act (former known as the "War Measures Act" which in turn allowed for the seizing of bank accounts etc (something that had a lot of people worried)
They didn't steal or seize any money from bank accounts though did they?
We had a famous case where a denier was convicted and deported.In Germany, the penalty for publicly denying the Holocaust is a prison sentence, which I find understandable in light of Germany’s troubled history, even though not all Germans were on the wrong side of history so to speak.
I’d say that the majority of deniers are more than just deniers tbf. This guy was raised in a fiercely traditional and conservative milieu and that’s basically the context in which he operated. It’s like the people who were involved in the attack on the capitol. Most of them were involved in all kinds of hateful acts, not just one specific act. People always act from within a socio-cultural framework or context, in this case a culture de-emphasizing the importance of critical thinking, education and an open-access society, making them prone to conspiracy theories and scapegoating. I mean, you’ve got to be utterly delusional and morally corrupt to deny something as horrible as the Holocaust.if you're talking about ernst Zundel, he was a bit more than just "a denier". jfc
Wasn’t that in the 80s as well - 40 years before holocaust denial became a criminal offence - and the only person in Canada to ever be prosecuted for it (though not specifically for the offence of “denial”)?if you're talking about ernst Zundel, he was a bit more than just "a denier". jfc
yeah he was prosecuted a few times in the 80's. the convictions were eventually overturned because even back then they decided it was a civil rights violation. in the early 2000 he was deported from the u.s. to canada for overstaying on a visa. then once back in canada they eventually deported him back to germany for being deemed a threat to national security.Wasn’t that in the 80s as well - 40 years before holocaust denial became a criminal offence - and the only person in Canada to ever be prosecuted for it?
Zundel was convicted crfiminally of spreading "false news" in relation to "denying" and beat the charge in the SCC as "spreading false news" was deemed unconstitutional. Later- He was deported to face criminal trail, elsewhere. Canadians cant be extradicted to a diff country unless a similar law exists here they are accused of-- so he was deported for hate speech accusations.
Not to be confused with Keegstra who was convicted of denying under hate speech laws,
he was convicyed a second time, however AFTER that he sucessfully appealed to the SCC which overturned his conviction as the provision he was convicted under was unconstitutional.Zundel didn’t quite “beat the charge in the SCC though, did he? They ordered a retrial and he was convicted again.
He was deported to face thiose accusations, Canadians whether citizens, refugees or landed immigrants ALL have the same Charter protections.He wasn’t deported for hate speech accusations at all.
he was convicyed a second time, however AFTER that he sucessfully appealed to the SCC which overturned his conviction as the provision he was convicted under was unconstitutional.
Zundel immigrated to Canada, and thus has the full protections of Canadian Law,
He was deported to face thiose accusations, Canadians whether citizens, refugees or landed immigrants ALL have the same Charter protections.
Canadians cannot be extradicted to face charges elsewhere unless a similar offence exists here. The government of the day deported him, to face trial in Germany, which if tried here, would have resulted in the exact same outcome. (conviction and deportation)
The bar to deport based on an extradition request is very low- and its clear to all those who know- the govt wanted him out. The rest is semantics.
Can’t possibly imagine why anyone would want that type of character out of their country, semantics or not. It does show all those protections that exist against a tyrannical Government though
Alarming but passable in Parliament? Unlikely.I added the bold) the Conservative leader of his Majesties Loyal Opposition has vowed to remove those protections, via the "notwithstanding clause" a section of the charter that lets governments iggy any court decision, including those of the SCoC which is very alarming.
In effect one branch of government making the next irrelvant.
The nothwithstanding clause can be triggered by the governemnt. It was intended to be rarely used and never pre emtively, however thats changing, Leader of Opposition says if they win, he will use it to over ride decisions they dont like- after the fact OR when tabling legislation. The latter is shocking as it effectively removes any judicial oversight relating to the Constitution.Alarming but passable in Parliament? Unlikely.
Here’s hoping for another Trudeau administration, or If not and the opposition gets a big enough majority that the Leader does what all of them do - bluster before an election to get the votes then abandon it when they’re in office (except Starmer. He seems to be doing alright so far)The nothwithstanding clause can be triggered by the governemnt. It was intended to be rarely used and never pre emtively, however thats changing, Leader of Opposition says if they win, he will use it to over ride decisions they dont like- after the fact OR when tabling legislation. The latter is shocking as it effectively removes any judicial oversight relating to the Constitution.
The only way it could be stopped is if it’s a minority Parliament.
Definition of “peaceful protesters” from a CBS article that the video was used in:
"Peaceful protesters" 1st amendment pepper sprayed?
but no images of the violence in that article that I saw.Definition of “peaceful protesters” from a CBS article that the video was used in:
“Thousands of protesters gathered near the Capitol, chanting "Free, Free Palestine," and some tried to block streets ahead of Netanyahu's speech, the Associated Press reported. Police wearing gas marks blocked the crowd — which was calling for an end to the war in Gaza that has killed more than 39,000 Palestinians according to Gaza officials — from getting closer to the Capitol.
The U.S. Capitol Police said on social media that pepper spray was being deployed because some members of the crowd had "started to become violent" and failed to obey an order to move back from the police line
After the protesters were turned away by police, they wound through Capitol Hill for several blocks before gathering in front of Union Station, according to the Associated Press, where protesters climbed the flagpoles outside Union Station and replaced the American flags with Palestinian flags. At least one person was arrested, and police again deployed "chemical agents," the AP reported, causing at least two people to be treated for chemical agent effects on the eyes.”
canada is the 51st sate of america isnt it? kinda like new zealand is the 7th state of australiaWhat does this have to do with Canada? Please stay on topic.
I thought that but OP changed the title of the thread to “…Canada/ world” so he could widen the scope and keep it on topic when he wanted to post about something South of the Canadian border.What does this have to do with Canada? Please stay on topic.
and for whatever reason (wink)....part of the olympic opening ceremoniesI thought that but OP changed the title of the thread to “…Canada/ world” so he could widen the scope and keep it on topic when he wanted to post about something South of the Canadian border.
Holocaust denial, Nazis, Canadian truckers who didn’t have their money stolen, and peppers sprayed protesters though 🤷♂️
I thought it was a demo on infringing the rights of othersand for whatever reason (wink)....part of the olympic opening ceremonies
I thought it was a demo on infringing the rights of others
View attachment 975559
No. a bit like how Canada, Australia and New Zealand are still in effect British dominions, but are called commonwealth countries because the former is too much of a bitter pill for them to swallow.canada is the 51st sate of america isnt it? kinda like new zealand is the 7th state of australia
They do, they just have a very poor internet connection. Must be the reason why Moose keeps tapping into my WiFi. Hopefully she can’t see my browsing history 😬I didn't realize Canada even had the internet.
In the many many years I've known you, I'd have to agree with that.............Hopefully she can’t see my browsing history 😬
Marie Antoinette and Strictly’s Anton Du Beke rolled into one? lolmarie antoninette
This raises another important issue about Censorship. Protest your First Amendment Rights!I got a **** comment cause I said how much a ***** charged when his name is ***** just joking but they got roleplay wtf
This raises another important issue about Censorship. Protest your First Amendment Rights!
There was a politics forum too I thinkIf memory serves me right (and it may not because..age) there used to be a section specifically for news and current affairs. I dunno why it doesn't exist anymore but if it did, it would be topic appropriate for all the threads like this one and others regarding the election, Israel/Hamas war etc . I noticed other sections like Roleplay existing and its as dead as my love life. (Kidding nothing is as dead as that).
Yes they did and it was pretty popular.If memory serves me right (and it may not because..age) there used to be a section specifically for news and current affairs. I dunno why it doesn't exist anymore but if it did, it would be topic appropriate for all the threads like this one and others regarding the election, Israel/Hamas war etc . I noticed other sections like Roleplay existing and its as dead as my love life. (Kidding nothing is as dead as that).
I’m selectively boycotting much of the Olympics because they’ve allowed a convicted child rapist to compete so I didn’t watch the opening ceremony.This from France panning the opening of the olympics. Many people are being quite critical of the opening. Should politics, religion sex; or orientation have any place with international sports?
Its very easy to be critical, Im also interested in hearing those who think the opening ceremony wasn't "the worst in olympic history."
edit: ive chosen this report because it has the least inflammatory language.
It ends up as a weapon that government will use if you say things that they don't like.It's only a crime if it can be proven you were doing it to willfully promote antisemitism and didn't actually believe the things you were saying.
(3.1) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2.1)
- (a) if they establish that the statements communicated were true;
- (b) if, in good faith, they expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
- (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds they believed them to be true; or
- (d) if, in good faith, they intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of antisemitism toward Jews.
still an extreme overreach by any government to threaten prison for people expressing their beliefs and opinions, no matter how shite they are. and for them to decide whether or not you truly believe them.
Don't mess with Canada..they will give you a stern looking at!I didn't realize Canada even had the internet.
I wonder what the outcome would be if you mocked other religions during the Olympics ?This from France panning the opening of the olympics. Many people are being quite critical of the opening. Should politics, religion sex; or orientation have any place with international sports?
Its very easy to be critical, Im also interested in hearing those who think the opening ceremony wasn't "the worst in olympic history."
edit: ive chosen this report because it has the least inflammatory language.
Very important 🌎 issue. I made a thread because this type of thing deserves its own thread https://forum.chat-avenue.com/threads/swingathon-and-the-like.951115/You don't need a bed to have Sex wouldn't stop anything
Apparently they don’t allow any political things at the OlympicsI want to know why Israel couldn’t wear the yellow pin thing, yet (as mentioned previously) the Dutch team has a nonce and will be surrounded by some of the people he is a danger to.
😲Very important 🌎 issue. I made a thread because this type of thing deserves its own thread https://forum.chat-avenue.com/threads/swingathon-and-the-like.951115/
Yes. Showing their feet on cam or whatever is not the same as a Dutchman raping a 12yo.I just read that Olympians are using OF to supplement their income.
Should this be allowed?
why not. being an athlete others are already using your body for their own gain.I just read that Olympians are using OF to supplement their income.
Should this be allowed?
I’m selectively boycotting much of the Olympics because they’ve allowed a convicted child rapist to compete so I didn’t watch the opening ceremony.
The Netherlandsomg that's quite alarming- what country is the creep from?
Replying separately to this because I don’t want any perception that a drag queen equates to a child rapist Olympian.What is your thinking of them having children in the drag queen act?
death penalty should of been givenThe Netherlands
In August 2014 van de Velde, then 19 years old, raped a 12-year-old girl he had met on F who lived in Milton Keynes, England. He travelled to her home and, when her mother was out, gave her alchol and then raped her several times at her home as well as near Furzton Lake which was nearby. The victim would eventually go on to self harm and once overdosed.
I assume by "state machine" they mean government. Do they give any specific examples of that opposition, or is the parrish preist the example?the whims of a state machine ideologically opposed to female emancipation
ty, ive change the title to conform to OG, have to double check about links- but if they are on topic I don't see why not , @Apollo @Ness_ebYes they did and it was pretty popular.
“World Events, Politics & News” it was called.
Used to have an Irish girl called Katie post multiple articles daily.
It should be put back. Oh, and LINKS ALLOWED to support the news being spoken about.
It was more of a news thing but Edith would have been a teen in the 40s. if you G00gle her name and include “Irish author” you should find plenty of info on her. If you want further reading you could G00gle something like “what was life like for women in 1960s Ireland?” and you should find plenty of examples.I assume by "state machine" they mean government. Do they give any specific examples of that opposition, or is the parrish preist the example?
edit: all I can find is "pulpit" opposition for publishing book(s) on sex (re women) in the 1940's
Seems that way. No Christians were harmed in the production according to the latest newsso what your saying is, the only ones with any right to complain are the people who worship the greek gods. finally got that sorted.
It started off being about internet and privacy issues in Canadawhat is this thread even about???
it's been changed, & derailed like 10 times since it's been made 💀
In b4 close
It’s a topic fluid thread 🤷🏻♂️It started off being about internet and privacy issues in Canada
Then it became Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about something that happened in the US
Then it became all issues in Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about the Olympics
Then it became everything everywhere on world events, politics and news when @-Luka took a trip down memory lane
OP has referred to Irish sex books from the 1940s so now there’s a high probability that it will be retitled to “Historical and Current World Events, Politics & News”
TL;DR (it’s an EE thread in all but location)
they should tri harder to clean it upThe Seine still isn’t safe to swim in, again delaying the Triathlon at the Olympics
Something is certainly fluidIt’s a topic fluid thread 🤷🏻♂️
S.C.C. Decision establishing IP addresses are protected under the Charter of Rights. A victory against state encroachment or unwelcome major hurdle for Internet Safety?
what about russia?In Germany, the penalty for publicly denying the Holocaust is a prison sentence, which I find understandable in light of Germany’s troubled history, even though not all Germans were on the wrong side of history so to speak.
If my memory serves me correctly, a woman called Ursula Haverbeck was recently sentenced to a total of 4 years in prison for publicly denying the Holocaust.
Russia are never guilty apparently.what about russia?
that's a womp womp momentUPDATE on the Olympic Opening Ceremony
Some Christians and churches are whining that they were being mocked because it was mocking the last supper
Some artists are whining that Da Vinci (or was is Di Caprio) was being mocked because it was mocking the painting “The Last Supper”
Far right politicians are whining because…well, they seek out things to whine about to detract from what they are.
The truth from the organiser is even more horrific. He was depicting a pagan party promoting liberty, equality, and fraternity while linking it to the Gods of Olympus.
What a storm in a teacup, and nobody thought to comment on the flag being raised upside down at the end of the ceremony
No one has any brain cells apart from civiliansIt started off being about internet and privacy issues in Canada
Then it became Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about something that happened in the US
Then it became all issues in Canada/world when OP wanted to talk about the Olympics
Then it became everything everywhere on world events, politics and news when @-Luka took a trip down memory lane
OP has referred to Irish sex books from the 1940s so now there’s a high probability that it will be retitled to “Historical and Current World Events, Politics & News”
TL;DR (it’s an EE thread in all but location)
good job nowIt’s a topic fluid thread 🤷🏻♂️