i will provide some honest insight on his performance as the general chat admin, there are people who would completely disagree with me, & that's fine;
i would say the quality of his job as the chat admin is
less than satisfactory,
but first let me give u a lil' background about myself for those who don't understand my steak in this...
not to brag since this is by no means an accomplishment... but to say the least i've become sort of a staple in general chat, my name has become; iconic, & my presence is heavily felt...
i have the most profile likes of anyone that uses general chat, my likes exceed the amount of people that are even online at any given time... plus i'm generally very friendly with
literally everyone, even people that some cannot stand, u could say that i am essentially the chat's default friend...
i would be lying if i said that
@H.R. PufnStuf, & i don't have a repertoire with each other that has more or less created a sort of symbiotic relationship of mostly annoyance that has nevertheless for the most part affected the chat entirely for the better...
so as for everyone else reading this can see, including
@H.R. PufnStuf himself, i am by no means a bitter ex-staff member; nor am i by any means a menace to the sanctity of the community... i can't even believe it myself sometimes, but i do genuinely enjoy being apart of this community & want to see it be better...
that's enough about lil' ol' me 💅🏼
if we are speakin'
strictly about him as admin of general chat,
then i am not even necessarily calling for
@H.R. PufnStuf to be removed as the chat's admin, but if he's either unable or incapable of doing a better job than what he is currently offering, then perhaps it is time he willingly steps aside & let someone else that is more capable take over...
when it comes to some of the actions he makes as our admin in general chat, they're questionable at worse / illogical at best...
it simply doesn't make sense no matter how you want to spin it to permanently ban someone for making jokes, no matter how;
crude -
edgy -
depraved -
in poor taste that they may be...
when you only temporarily ban people who are for example; actually committing a crime by trying to groom minors using religion, or attempting to lure in pubescents teenagers by soliciting to them what amounts to pornography...
the craziest part about that, is the sheer fact that there is actually mountains of evidence of particular users (who will not be named) engaging in literally the two examples i gave, both of which only received multiple warnings until they were finally only banned for a month...
meanwhile, there is a user (who also won't be named) who was recently permanently banned for making jokes of the same nature i also mentioned, & the only evidence against them is that they made these jokes; there is no actual evidence in which shows them engaging in a criminal act like sending nude photos to a teenage boy...
...one simply said ignorant ass words, the others knowingly engaged in physical criminal behavior...
let me ask you, which should have been permanently banned & which should has been only temporarily banned???
so unless these administrative actions start actually making sense, i'm going to have to say it's almost like having joe biden as general chat admin 🤷🏼♀️
note: this thread is actively being recorded for quality assurance purposes