-Luka
Platinum Member
Like the straight priest doing “gay abuse” to the altar boys?I'm sure you can find statistics somewhere and it probably outweighs gay abuse because 95% of the world is straight
Like the straight priest doing “gay abuse” to the altar boys?I'm sure you can find statistics somewhere and it probably outweighs gay abuse because 95% of the world is straight
Correction ... 90%I'm sure you can find statistics somewhere and it probably outweighs gay abuse because 95% of the world is straight
You put forward the groomer liable (similar to Blood Liable) and myth that's been used to persecute my people as if Christian institutions are not just centers of child abuse and indoctrination into a death cult. That's why.What's your point? People commit sin ?
I already know that and it's because of Satan.
These people deserve to burn in a lake of fire no matter if they're evangelist, Catholic etc..
But you guys keep implying I support them
Satan is the Lord of deception.
The question says hetero monogamous relationship and talks about a persons history.I’d be a lucky fkn woman tbh to have a fella that would have an MMF.
Pros and cons
History can also repeat itself. Which would then make your original question moreThe question says hetero monogamous relationship and talks about a persons history.
Speak simple EnglishYou put forward the groomer liable (similar to Blood Liable) and myth that's been used to persecute my people as if Christian institutions are not just centers of child abuse and indoctrination into a death cult. That's why.
Gotta Dumb That Down For Wonder Bread .... (he makes one wonder if he has a brain)You put forward the groomer liable (similar to Blood Liable) and myth that's been used to persecute my people as if Christian institutions are not just centers of child abuse and indoctrination into a death cult. That's why.
So you agree that history repeats itself.History can also repeat itself. Which would then make your original question more
Plausible.
Don’t live in the past, maybe? Hypothetical situation or not.
Unquestionably isn’t the word of use.So you agree that history repeats itself.
Therefore you would agree a person with a gay past would be unquestionably more likely to do something gay compared to a straight male In a straight monogamous relationship.
Look up blood libel and Fascism and see why perpetuating the Groomer Libel in modern times is a similar myth made to dehumanize queer people enough to pass repressive legislation at best, and "lulz—Woodchipper" at worst.Speak simple English
I would argue those people ain't straight if they're having sex with you.Unquestionably isn’t the word of use.
People experiment (consenting adults!) if it’s not for them they wouldn’t do it again.
Been with more straight men than gay men, it happens more than you think and they go back to their wives. Same as wives would do. I think you’re trying to reason with the idea of a “man” rather than a straight “man”.
Sounds like political stuff, I don't want to get into politics. This is a sexuality forum. Though you can pm if you want.Look up blood libel and Fascism and see why perpetuating the Groomer Libel in modern times is a similar myth made to dehumanize queer people enough to pass repressive legislation at best, and "lulz—Woodchipper" at worst.
I understand that. To me as an outsider, not as a woofter, but as a rational human being I think I’d have the same initial reaction as her. Doesn’t make her homophobic, no just because she says it’s gay. It is gay because it’s man on man. It’d be the same reaction if my male partner said they’d gone down to poonani land and I didn’t know. Yeah you bet your backside I’d be calling him all the fannybandits going. Would I care? Not enough to destroy a relationship; more ammo I have in the relationship the better.I would argue those people ain't straight if they're having sex with you.
I'm reasoning both ideas.
For example everyone here is pretty much LGBT supporter so I know the responses are going to be skewed.
Yesterday I asked a woman I know to be straight and she said if she found out her husband had sucked a **** before she would dump his ass because that's gay. She isn't a homophobe.
Her perception of a man, probably much like mine, is that real men don't suck D.
I use the terms straight and MAN interchangeablly. A MAN is straight, though I know it takes 2 Men to be gay. Get it?
So Ergo .. If A "Man" Sucks D He Isn't A "Man" ... So Then If He Isn't A "Man" A "Real Man" As You Say ...perception of a man, like mine, is that real men don't suck D.
I mean youre right it is subjective, which is why I wanted to hear people's responses.I understand that. To me as an outsider, not as a woofter, but as a rational human being I think I’d have the same initial reaction as her. Doesn’t make her homophobic, no just because she says it’s gay. It is gay because it’s man on man. It’d be the same reaction if my male partner said they’d gone down to poonani land and I didn’t know. Yeah you bet your backside I’d be calling him all the fannybandits going. Would I care? Not enough to destroy a relationship; more ammo I have in the relationship the better.
It’s all subjective.
A man is straight until his inhibitions kick in. Same as women.
A gay manSo Ergo .. If A "Man" Sucks D He Isn't A "Man" ... So Then If He Isn't A "Man" A "Real Man" As You Say ...
The Please Enlighten Us All Professor 🙄 WHAT .. Pray Tell .. Would He Actually Be If Not A "Man" ?
![]()
And By That Analogy Professor Bread 🙄 You Are Stating That Gay Men Are Not "Real Men"A gay man