Well it's certainly alive, but where is the line drawn where it's considered a full-fledged human being with rights? Plants are alive. Bacteria are alive. Pigs are alive. But none of those are considered humans with rights.
if you are that fucking stupid that you can not understand how humans reproduce and are created, vs plants, bacteria, and pigs, you shouldn't vote, drive, or reproduce.
FYI, trees are plants, and guess what, certain trees are protected, even pigs and farm animals, are protected from abuse and harm, so are all animals to a degree. shove firecrackers down a frog's throat and kill it, no one gives a ****, do the same to a dog, cat, or bird, and chances are you going to catch a charge.
Even bacteria have classifications of good and bad, people even take something called, probiotics, wonder what that is, and guess what, that means bacteria have value. All life from start to finish has inherent value and purpose.
If you are going to be pro-choice, at least have enough fucking brain matter to grasp that much, and also try to find enough brain matter that a government has zero business deciding when human life begins, because when you give the government that much power to decide when human life begins; guess what else you open the door to, to the government deciding if it is okay to euthanize a person based on issues such as, age, disability, and health.
The US Government has zero right to determine such things. Nor should the US Government put taxpayer money into such things.
what idiots that jerk off into the idea of, well it is just sperm and egg, and I don't see a heartbeat, i don't see anything that looks human so it aint human, how barbaric and ignorant that train of thought really is, when one simply switches it around to race, back when blacks were being traded as slaves, and were seen as less than human, primitive. The same idiocy happened in our government, of does this person with different colored skin, who is clearly not educated, can not read, or write, etc, does that person have any rights is that person equal to me as a human being, and their answer was no;, To a slave being bold enough to go to court to and have a trial to be given equal rights as a human being and a judge declaring no you do not have rights and the history that in turn followed. ( granted slavery has been a global fact of the world since one people fought another people and took them captive American slavery just gets all the publicity). and what is ironic is the pro-choice movement doesn't even come close to grasping their own idocracy. Then Later having to debate is AIDS only a gay disease? To have to debate should women have the right to vote. Should homosexuals be treated as people?
Scientists have no right to declare when a person is a person and why. Neither does the government.
Religion is barely any better at guiding the human race on such things, they fail over and over in so many ways on this issue when at best any religion would be well and fair to say, in our religion we believe life begins at the moment of conception, it is fair and true to say because it is backed up by natural law that when two humans of the opposite sex come together to reproduce and everything works as it should, holy **** they make a baby, sometimes twins. Wanna debate at what moment twins become twins in the womb, that is a moronic debate to have as well. And swinging back to religion quickly all major religions love to take away peoples' God-given common sense, and God-given right to determine their own fate; their only duty is to teach the values of their religion and at best suggest that people follow their religion. Not damn people to hell or whatever if they do not follow to the T what their religion teaches.
When morons want to stay morons and laugh and have a circle slap fest at how a human is only a human under certain criteria all the rest of us can do is hope they don't reproduce and spread their way of thinking. Those with the patience to want to try to sway them to normalcy should be given a medal.
The next debate is what is common sense, and that is simple, if you have to debate what is common sense, you do not get to have an opinion on it, nor get to hold office in any part of the government.