- Status
D
Deleted member 263960
Guest
Thats it HR. Just keep focusing on me but not the real issues. 👋
This is the conversation in question.
This was never meant to be the be-all end-all of your investigation, but merely a piece of the puzzle. COMBINED WITH other pieces of evidence that can be found here https://forum.chat-avenue.com/threads/alright.936443/ :
"And I'm not a pedo , one time I was joking that I'd ask mikah to **** with me and I didn't even notice that she's 15 oh boo hoo"
(Caught lying, the SS shows she claimed to be 15, he said he didn't care he'd jsut break out of prison, and what kinda loopy land have we entered where saying "I'm serious" means i'm joking?)
"and unlike u im not an actual pedo coz just because girls have kissed me irl and were underage that doesnt make me a pedo I already said that."
(Like they somehow forced you? Youre an adult, youre supposed to have better common sense than this)
COMBINED WITH your ability to check chat logs to confirm the legitimacy of these SSs (If this isn't in your ability to do, this place is more broken than I thought)
COMBINED WITH witness reports of not only just my friends but yours too (Lesley as an example)
COMBINED WITH the fact he's 22 and has been banned from the teens room for going there.
COMBINED WITH the fact you say he's admitted to this and apologised
This gives a very strong case that this chatter has violated the ATTEMPTED EXPLOITATION of a minor, which is supposed to be met with a ZERO TOLERANCE of a BAN. Not a supposed "Ban warning", because "It's a prank bro" is actually some sort of valid excuse that completely invalidates the idea of ZERO TOLERANCE.
And for doing the due diligence of reporting this to you, in PM, as requested, we're labelled mini modders and trolls that are selfish and in no way are just trying to look out for the safety of minors in this once loved chat room of ours.
This is ridiculous and inexcusable. Even if he WAS joking, it's called consequences of your own actions, because tolerating this based on a joke doesn't appear to be a case of ZERO TOLERANCE.
Bumped for visibility, as I feel like this is INCREDIBLY important and being buried under other fights and spam posting
I know you think this is real cute what you're doing but honestly, you're just making yourself into a fool.
I cannot believe this muppet. I gave proof, a censored screenshot. (It shouldn't matter if it's censored or not!) Clearly if I censored it, it has to be something bad. But nope, it got disregarded. Any screenie is proof! Bloody stupid. And also this:
I reported this guy a thousand times, I went to the mods, and nothing. Some even said they would tell HR, which is clear they haven't. Or they did and he just chooses to do nothing!
I reported this guy a thousand times, I went to the mods, and nothing. Some even said they would tell HR, which is clear they haven't. Or they did and he just chooses to do nothing!
Keep preaching. Something is bound to happen. Maybe HR will get fired. Lmfao.
L'Angelo d'Mysterioso
Active Member
Holy fucking ****, Admin having a meltdown on aisle 3. Clean up required.
HR if you don't like people who have been on the site for 8 years and who have modded in gen and other rooms as well as using other chat sites in the past telling you how to do your job, do your job the way it's supposed to be done and stop trying to cover up and clean up Chat Avenue's pedo problem by hoping it'll go away if people don't mention it. It won't.
HR if you don't like people who have been on the site for 8 years and who have modded in gen and other rooms as well as using other chat sites in the past telling you how to do your job, do your job the way it's supposed to be done and stop trying to cover up and clean up Chat Avenue's pedo problem by hoping it'll go away if people don't mention it. It won't.
It's nice having smart people like you here. And everyone else whom isn't HR. :3
wildwestwanderer
Bronze Member
Honestly who uses the word pelvis. He's referring to photos of people at the beach or shirtless, that are ABOVE the waist.
Not surprising you have no idea about the human anatomy.
So nudity isnt bannable. But you'll ban me for pictures of my "pelvis".
The double-standards and hypocrisy is glaringly apparent...
Not surprising you have no idea about the human anatomy.
So nudity isnt bannable. But you'll ban me for pictures of my "pelvis".
The double-standards and hypocrisy is glaringly apparent...
D
Deleted member 263960
Guest
https://forum.chat-avenue.com/threads/alright.936443/page-3 clearly shows why that radair chatter was not banned. And wish as we might- nudity is not bannable t.hat I know of. I dont answer to ********, I answer to the admin-and Im clear on my role amd limits. And th.ats what Ill keep doing 🙂
It seems your speech impediment is showing. If nudity isn't ban-able, then you should unban all those pedos who sent D pics. After all, they are "just nudes". .-.
We know why he wasn't banned, you've completely ignored my statement where I've said change your rules to reflect that, because lying about "not being serious" after being caught saying "I was serious" isn't a case of ZERO TOLERANCE.
How are we at all supposed to take the rules of these room seriously and "flag stuff against the rules" if a way out of a zero tolerance policy is to say "It's a prank bro" essentially? This sets a precedent, not only can you just make stuff up after the fact to get out of breaking them, or what is in the rules isn't exactly believable or reflected in reality.
And I'm confident in my statement he's lying when he's said "She never told me she was 15" when it was IN HER PROFILE and my SS shows mikah telling him DIRECTLY she is 15, only to be answered by "I'll break out of jail for you".
Anyone can lie when caught. Again, amazing we are labelled trolls when we have genuine concern, yet you're essentially saying this guy is "Shock trolling" and that's all of a sudden fine. Never seen you start a thread about him trolling.
How are we at all supposed to take the rules of these room seriously and "flag stuff against the rules" if a way out of a zero tolerance policy is to say "It's a prank bro" essentially? This sets a precedent, not only can you just make stuff up after the fact to get out of breaking them, or what is in the rules isn't exactly believable or reflected in reality.
And I'm confident in my statement he's lying when he's said "She never told me she was 15" when it was IN HER PROFILE and my SS shows mikah telling him DIRECTLY she is 15, only to be answered by "I'll break out of jail for you".
Anyone can lie when caught. Again, amazing we are labelled trolls when we have genuine concern, yet you're essentially saying this guy is "Shock trolling" and that's all of a sudden fine. Never seen you start a thread about him trolling.
HR once said I was "mini modding" even though I wasn't. I showed how users were getting muted for no reason. Including me. I was talking about how a pedo didn't get banned and how the mods didn't do anything. And I got muted. And yet, that's considered "mini modding"? Bruv, HR is quite special.
L'Angelo d'Mysterioso
Active Member
Dude, you know you can edit your posts right? I mean, typing like a lobotomised 5 year old with brain damage does not make you look like an admin who has their house in order.
Last edited:
He's "special".
That's what I said early in this forum, I stopped flagging stuff because I was made fun of for mini-modding when doing so. Yet we're being criticised for not-flagging "skimpy" posts? The same thing HR has said "I don't agree with morally but can't do anything against the rules"? Damned if we do, damned if we don't.
cozmokittee
Active Member
Those screen shots, now less rule-breaky, part 1.
cozmokittee
Active Member
Screen shots with less breakage of rules, part 2
now y'all can get a better grip of the reality of what we're worried about.
now y'all can get a better grip of the reality of what we're worried about.
- Status